Compare performance (138 HP vs 158 HP), boot space and price (29,100 £ vs 24,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Kia Niro or Renault Symbioz?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
In the competitive automotive market, SUVs are rapidly gaining popularity. In this article, we will compare two significant contenders in the hybrid segment: the Kia Niro and the Renault Symbioz. Both vehicles offer eco-friendly technology without compromising performance, making them ideal choices for environmentally conscious buyers. Let’s delve into their technical specifications, innovations, and overall driving experience.
Both the Kia Niro and Renault Symbioz boast a contemporary SUV design with sleek lines and functional dimensions. The Niro measures 4420 mm in length, 1825 mm in width, and 1545 mm in height, providing a spacious cabin and ample storage with a trunk capacity of 451 liters.
On the other hand, the Symbioz is slightly shorter at 4413 mm, with a width of 1797 mm and a height of 1575 mm. Despite its compact size, it offers a generous trunk space of 492 liters, slightly more than that of the Niro. This advantage makes the Symbioz a practical option for families or those needing extra cargo space.
The Kia Niro comes with two hybrid powertrain options: a Full Hybrid and a Plug-in Hybrid, delivering a power output of 129 HP and 171 HP, respectively. The 1.6-liter engine offers a torque of 265 Nm and accelerates from 0-100 km/h in 11.3 seconds for the Full Hybrid variant, while the Plug-in Hybrid achieves it in just 10.4 seconds.
In comparison, the Renault Symbioz features a Full Hybrid engine producing 143 HP and a torque of 250 Nm. It also has a 0-100 km/h acceleration time of 10.6 seconds, making it competitive in performance. While both vehicles are equipped with automatic transmissions, the Niro utilizes a dual-clutch setup that enhances driving efficiency and responsiveness.
The pursuit of efficiency is pivotal in hybrid vehicles. The Kia Niro stands out with its excellent fuel consumption of as low as 4.4 L/100 km for the Full Hybrid variant and 0.8 L/100 km when considering its electric range of 65 km. In terms of emissions, the Niro excels with CO2 figures starting at 100 g/km, showcasing its commitment to a greener planet.
The Renault Symbioz, while still efficient, has a slightly higher fuel consumption of 4.8 L/100 km, which may be a consideration for the eco-conscious driver. Its emissions are rated at 109 g/km. Both vehicles fall within the CO2 efficiency class C, but the Niro maintains a slight advantage in sustainability.
Inside, the Kia Niro offers a modern, user-friendly infotainment system with an emphasis on connectivity and convenience. It is designed to accommodate five passengers comfortably, which adds to its appeal as a family vehicle.
The Renault Symbioz, also seating five, integrates cutting-edge technology, including advanced driver-assistance systems that enhance safety and ease of driving. Both vehicles feature high-quality materials and a blend of comfort and practicality, ensuring an enjoyable ride for all passengers.
The decision between the Kia Niro and Renault Symbioz ultimately comes down to personal preferences. The Niro impresses with its fuel efficiency, electric range, and greater power options, making it a versatile choice for a wide array of drivers. The Symbioz, however, captivates with its innovative technology, spacious interior, and slightly better trunk capacity.
Regardless of choice, both the Kia Niro and Renault Symbioz represent significant strides forward in the hybrid SUV market, catering to environmentally conscious consumers who seek a blend of performance, technology, and practicality. Whether you prioritize efficiency over luxury or vice versa, both vehicles promise to meet modern demands for sustainability in style.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Renault Symbioz is a bit cheaper – starting at 24,700 £ , while the Kia Niro costs 29,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4,449 £.
Both cars consume an average of 4.5 L/100km – no difference here.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Renault Symbioz offers moderately more power – delivering 158 HP compared to 138 HP. That’s roughly 20 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Renault Symbioz is noticeably quicker – completing the sprint in 9.1 s, while the Kia Niro takes 11.1 s. That’s about 2 s quicker.
Both models offer the same torque – 265 Nm.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Renault Symbioz is barely lighter – 1,359 kg compared to 1,474 kg. The difference is around 115 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Renault Symbioz offers noticeably more boot space – 576 L compared to 451 L. That’s a difference of about 125 L.
When it comes to payload, the Kia Niro carries only slightly more – 466 kg compared to 459 kg. That’s a difference of about 7 kg.
The Renault Symbioz stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Kia Niro is a practical crossover that blends economy and everyday versatility without sacrificing comfort. With a roomy, well-laid-out cabin and calm, composed handling, it’s an easy-to-live-with choice for commuters and families.
details
The Renault Symbioz is a forward-looking concept car that imagines a seamless link between vehicle and home, pairing a lounge-like cabin with striking, futuristic styling. More idea than production plan, it showcases Renault's vision for connected, autonomous and sustainable mobility while provoking debate about how we will live and travel.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
29,100 - 33,800 £
|
Price
24,700 - 31,100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 4.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 6 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
102 - 111 g/km
|
co2
102 - 136 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,474 kg
|
Curb weight
1,359 - 1,465 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
451 L
|
Trunk capacity
492 - 576 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,825 mm
|
Width
1,797 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
466 kg
|
Payload
455 - 459 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
138 HP
|
Power HP
140 - 158 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.1 - 11.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.1 - 11 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
265 Nm
|
Torque
250 - 265 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
102 kW
|
Power kW
103 - 116 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,580 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,332 - 1,789 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, E
|
|
Brand
Kia
|
Brand
Renault
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España