VS

Alpine A290 vs BMW X1 comparison

Compare performance (218 HP vs 326 HP), boot space and price (33,200 £ vs 38,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Alpine A290 or BMW X1?

Alpine A290 vs BMW X1: Key differences

Alpine A290

4.6 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • somewhat cheaper
  • significantly more electric range
  • marginally lighter
details

BMW X1

4.3 (8 Reviews)
rate
  • markedly more power
  • somewhat quicker 0–100 km/h
  • noticeably more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

A290

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Alpine A290 is somewhat cheaper – starting at 33,200 £ , while the BMW X1 costs 38,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5,486 £.

As for electric range, the Alpine A290 offers significantly more range – reaching up to 380 km, about 299 km more than the BMW X1.

X1

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the BMW X1 offers markedly more power – delivering 326 HP compared to 218 HP. That’s roughly 108 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the BMW X1 is somewhat quicker – completing the sprint in 5.4 s, while the Alpine A290 takes 6.4 s. That’s about 1 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the BMW X1 delivers clearly more torque with 477 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 177 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Alpine A290 is marginally lighter – 1,554 kg compared to 1,575 kg. The difference is around 21 kg.

Looking at boot space, the BMW X1 offers noticeably more boot space – 540 L compared to 326 L. That’s a difference of about 214 L.

When it comes to payload, the BMW X1 carries clearly more – 500 kg compared to 396 kg. That’s a difference of about 104 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Alpine A290 has only a minor advantage in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £33,200
A290

Alpine A290

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 177 - 218 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 15.8 - 16.5 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 364 - 380 km
details

Frequently compared as well

BMW 2 Series Active Tourer
BMW X1
VS
The BMW 2 Series Active Tourer is the clever, family-focused MPV that swaps SUV posturing for genuinely useful space and a lower, car‑like ride, while the BMW X1 dresses up as a compact SUV with higher seating, tougher styling and a bit more composure on rutted roads. Pick the 2 Series for easy …
BMW 1 Series
BMW X1
VS
The BMW 1 Series and BMW X1 share BMW’s driving focus but target different needs: the 1 Series is a compact, sporty hatch that prioritises handling and driver engagement, while the X1 is a compact SUV offering higher seating, more interior space and everyday practicality. Pick the 1 Series if you …
Alpine A290
BMW X1

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Alpine A290

The Alpine A290 brings Alpine's racing-bred spirit to the road with taut handling, razor-sharp steering and a compact, cheeky silhouette that's impossible to ignore. It's a car for drivers who want pure fun rather than family practicality — a playful, stylish pocket rocket that makes every back road feel like a racetrack and hands out smiles with the key.

details
alpinea290

Reviews Alpine A290

4.6 (3 Reviews)
rate
Emin Molu
17 Apr 2026, 21:05:51

excellent handling, excellent damping, excellent noise supression, excellent design.fantastic fun to drive.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

BMW X1

The BMW X1 delivers BMW's sporty driving character in a compact premium crossover package, making daily driving both engaging and practical. With a refined cabin, flexible cargo space and composed handling, it's a smart choice for buyers who want luxury and versatility without compromise.

details
P90479957_highRes_bmw-x1-xdrive-23i-09
P90479906_highRes_bmw-x1-xdrive-23i-09
P90479918_highRes_bmw-x1-xdrive-23i-09
P90479901_highRes_bmw-x1-xdrive-23i-09
P90479947_highRes_bmw-x1-xdrive-23i-09

Reviews BMW X1

4.3 (8 Reviews)
rate
Maria
23 Feb 2026, 10:18:11

The car has beautiful lines, superb grip, sheer driving pleasure, excellent interior trim, a large boot — pure classic.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

BMW X1
Peugeot 3008
VS
The BMW X1 and Peugeot 3008 are two leading compact SUVs that target different priorities: the X1 delivers BMW’s trademark driving sharpness and a more premium feel, while the 3008 focuses on clever packaging, comfort and distinctive styling. This comparison will zero in on space, performance, …
BMW X1
CUPRA Terramar
VS
Choosing between the BMW X1 and the CUPRA Terramar comes down to whether you prefer BMW’s refined compact SUV experience or CUPRA’s sportier, performance-focused take on the segment. This comparison highlights the key differences in driving dynamics, interior quality, tech and practicality to help …
BMW 3 Series Touring
BMW X1
VS
Deciding between the BMW 3 Series Touring and the BMW X1 means weighing estate-car driving dynamics and cargo capacity against compact-SUV practicality and a higher seating position. The 3 Series Touring delivers sharper handling and a roomier load area, while the X1 offers greater ride height, …
BMW iX1
BMW X1
VS
Comparing the BMW iX1 and BMW X1 comes down to choosing an all‑electric small SUV versus its conventional petrol/diesel sibling — both deliver BMW’s sharp handling but offer very different running costs, packaging and ownership experiences. If you value quiet acceleration, lower everyday energy …
BMW X1
Ford Kuga
VS
In a head-to-head comparison between the BMW X1 and Ford Kuga, the BMW takes the edge with its premium interior quality and dynamic driving experience. However, the Ford Kuga shines with its spacious cabin and advanced safety features, catering to families seeking practicality. Ultimately, choosing …
Alfa Romeo Junior
Alpine A290
VS
In a thrilling showdown of compact charisma, the Alfa Romeo Junior takes on the Alpine A290 with poise and style. The Junior captivates with its timeless Italian design and sporty dynamics, appealing to those who cherish agile handling and lively road presence. In contrast, the Alpine A290 offers a …
BMW X1
Hyundai Tucson
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the BMW X1 stands out with its blend of sporty performance and luxurious interior, appealing to those who prioritize driving dynamics. Conversely, the Hyundai Tucson offers impressive value with its spacious cabin, advanced safety features, and user-friendly …
BMW X1
SEAT Ateca
VS
BMW X1 and SEAT Ateca go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the BMW X1 or the SEAT Ateca is the …
Alpine A290
BMW X1

Costs and Consumption
Price
33,200 - 39,600 £
Price
38,700 - 56,200 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
2.5 - 7.7 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
15.8 - 16.5 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
364 - 380 km
Electric Range
81 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
57 - 175 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,554 kg
Curb weight
1,575 - 1,935 kg
Trunk capacity
326 L
Trunk capacity
490 - 540 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,820 mm
Width
1,845 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
396 kg
Payload
490 - 500 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Diesel MHEV, Petrol MHEV, Petrol, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
177 - 218 HP
Power HP
136 - 326 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 9.2 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
285 - 300 Nm
Torque
230 - 477 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
130 - 160 kW
Power kW
100 - 240 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1,499 - 1,998 cm3

General
Model Year
2024
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, F, B
Brand
Alpine
Brand
BMW
Is the Alpine A290 offered with different drivetrains?

The Alpine A290 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.