@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
@ BMW Group Press
VS

Alpine A290 vs BMW XM – Performance, range & efficiency compared

Everyday use, family trips or long-distance drives – here’s where the differences show.
Discover whether Alpine A290 or BMW XM fits your lifestyle better.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

A290 @ Alpine / Renault Group Media

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Alpine A290 has a significantly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 33200 £, while the BMW XM costs 114700 £. That’s a price difference of around 81514 £.

As for range, the Alpine A290 performs significantly better – achieving up to 380 km, about 295 km more than the BMW XM.

XM @ BMW Group Press

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the BMW XM has a convincingly edge – offering 748 HP compared to 218 HP. That’s roughly 530 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the BMW XM is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.80 s, while the Alpine A290 takes 6.40 s. That’s about 2.60 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the BMW XM performs evident better – reaching 250 km/h, while the Alpine A290 tops out at 170 km/h. The difference is around 80 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: BMW XM pulls significantly stronger with 1000 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 700 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: BMW XM offers noticeable more seating capacity – 7 vs 5.

In curb weight, Alpine A290 is convincingly lighter – 1479 kg compared to 2695 kg. The difference is around 1216 kg.

In terms of boot space, the BMW XM offers evident more room – 527 L compared to 326 L. That’s a difference of about 201 L.

In maximum load capacity, the BMW XM performs evident better – up to 1820 L, which is about 714 L more than the Alpine A290.

When it comes to payload, BMW XM to a small extent takes the win – 525 kg compared to 471 kg. That’s a difference of about 54 kg.

Who wins the race?

The BMW XM proves to be has the upper hand and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
BMW XM is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £114,700
XM @ BMW Group Press

BMW XM

  • Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 476 - 748 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 1.4 - 2 L
  • Electric Range : 82 - 85 km

Alpine A290

5 (1)
rate

The Alpine A290 embodies a thrilling blend of modern design and exhilarating performance, capturing the spirit of the brand's racing heritage. With its agile handling and responsive drive, this compact vehicle promises an engaging experience both on the road and the track. Inside, it features a driver-focused cockpit that seamlessly integrates technology and comfort, making every journey an adventure.

details

BMW XM

The BMW XM represents a bold foray into the high-performance luxury SUV market with its striking design and powerful hybrid drive. This model melds cutting-edge technology with opulence, offering an unparalleled driving experience. Its interior is meticulously crafted, providing both driver and passengers with supreme comfort and innovative connectivity features.

details
Alpine A290
BMW XM
A290 @ Alpine / Renault Group Media
XM @ BMW Group Press

Costs and Consumption

Price
33200 - 39600 £
Price
114700 - 157200 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
1.4 - 2 L
Consumption kWh/100km
15.8 - 16.5 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
364 - 380 km
Electric Range
82 - 85 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
25.70 kWh
co2
0 g/km
co2
31 - 44 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
69 L

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
7
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1479 kg
Curb weight
2695 - 2795 kg
Trunk capacity
326 L
Trunk capacity
527 L
Length
3997 mm
Length
5110 mm
Width
1823 mm
Width
2005 mm
Height
1512 mm
Height
1755 mm
Max trunk capacity
1106 L
Max trunk capacity
1820 L
Payload
471 kg
Payload
505 - 525 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
-
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
177 - 218 HP
Power HP
476 - 748 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 5.1 s
Max Speed
160 - 170 km/h
Max Speed
250 km/h
Torque
285 - 300 Nm
Torque
700 - 1000 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
6 - 8
Power kW
130 - 160 kW
Power kW
350 - 550 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
2998 - 4395 cm3

General

Model Year
2024
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
Brand
Alpine
Brand
BMW
Is the Alpine A290 offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.