@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
@ BYD Auto / BYD Global Media
VS

Alpine A290 vs BYD Tang – Performance, range & efficiency compared

Everyday use, family trips or long-distance drives – here’s where the differences show.
Discover whether Alpine A290 or BYD Tang fits your lifestyle better.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

A290 @ Alpine / Renault Group Media

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Alpine A290 has a convincingly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 33200 £, while the BYD Tang costs 64300 £. That’s a price difference of around 31114 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Alpine A290: with 15.80 kWh per 100 km, it’s clearly more efficient than the BYD Tang with 24 kWh. That’s a difference of about 8.20 kWh.

As for range, the BYD Tang performs clearly perceptible better – achieving up to 530 km, about 150 km more than the Alpine A290.

Tang @ BYD Auto / BYD Global Media

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the BYD Tang has a convincingly edge – offering 517 HP compared to 218 HP. That’s roughly 299 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the BYD Tang is noticeable quicker – completing the sprint in 4.90 s, while the Alpine A290 takes 6.40 s. That’s about 1.50 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the BYD Tang performs a bit better – reaching 190 km/h, while the Alpine A290 tops out at 170 km/h. The difference is around 20 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: BYD Tang pulls convincingly stronger with 680 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 380 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: BYD Tang offers distinct more seating capacity – 7 vs 5.

In curb weight, Alpine A290 is convincingly lighter – 1479 kg compared to 2630 kg. The difference is around 1151 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Alpine A290 offers clearly perceptible more room – 326 L compared to 235 L. That’s a difference of about 91 L.

In maximum load capacity, the BYD Tang performs noticeable better – up to 1655 L, which is about 549 L more than the Alpine A290.

When it comes to payload, BYD Tang a bit takes the win – 575 kg compared to 471 kg. That’s a difference of about 104 kg.

Who wins the race?

The BYD Tang proves to be is largely superior and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
BYD Tang is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

about £64,285
Tang @ BYD Auto / BYD Global Media

BYD Tang

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 517 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 24 kWh
  • Electric Range : 530 km

Alpine A290

5 (1)
rate

The Alpine A290 embodies a thrilling blend of modern design and exhilarating performance, capturing the spirit of the brand's racing heritage. With its agile handling and responsive drive, this compact vehicle promises an engaging experience both on the road and the track. Inside, it features a driver-focused cockpit that seamlessly integrates technology and comfort, making every journey an adventure.

details

BYD Tang

The BYD Tang represents a bold entry into the competitive SUV market, blending cutting-edge technology with modern design aesthetics. Its spacious interior is complemented by high-quality materials and innovative features, making it a strong contender for families and tech enthusiasts alike. With an emphasis on sustainability, the Tang offers an eco-friendly driving experience without compromising on performance or luxury.

details
Alpine A290
BYD Tang
A290 @ Alpine / Renault Group Media
Tang @ BYD Auto / BYD Global Media

Costs and Consumption

Price
33200 - 39600 £
Price
64300 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
15.8 - 16.5 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
24 kWh
Electric Range
364 - 380 km
Electric Range
530 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
7
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1479 kg
Curb weight
2630 kg
Trunk capacity
326 L
Trunk capacity
235 L
Length
3997 mm
Length
4970 mm
Width
1823 mm
Width
1955 mm
Height
1512 mm
Height
1745 mm
Max trunk capacity
1106 L
Max trunk capacity
1655 L
Payload
471 kg
Payload
575 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
-
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
177 - 218 HP
Power HP
517 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.90 s
Max Speed
160 - 170 km/h
Max Speed
190 km/h
Torque
285 - 300 Nm
Torque
680 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
130 - 160 kW
Power kW
380 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2024
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Alpine
Brand
BYD
Is the Alpine A290 offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.