Compare performance (517 HP vs 680 HP), boot space and price (64,300 £ vs 73,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – BYD Tang or Volvo EX90?
The automotive landscape is witnessing a remarkable shift towards electric vehicles, with manufacturers competing fiercely to capture the SUV market. Two prominent models vying for attention are the BYD Tang and the Volvo EX90. Each offering a unique blend of technology, performance, and comfort, this comparison dives deep into their specifications and innovations.
When it comes to performance, both the BYD Tang and the Volvo EX90 showcase impressive specifications. The Tang is powered by an electric motor generating 517 HP, providing a thrilling acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h in just 4.9 seconds. With a torque of 680 Nm, this all-wheel-drive SUV promises exceptional traction and driving dynamics. Its top speed reaches 190 km/h, catering to both thrill-seekers and everyday drivers alike.
On the other hand, the Volvo EX90 offers multiple powertrain options, including versions delivering 279 HP up to 517 HP, similar to that of the Tang. The performance variants of the EX90 can also achieve 0-100 km/h in as little as 4.9 seconds. However, its top speed is slightly lower, capped at 180 km/h. The torque ranges from 490 Nm in the entry-level model, up to a staggering 910 Nm in its highest output version, ensuring that performance is not compromised.
Efficiency in electric vehicles is crucial for a satisfying ownership experience. The BYD Tang boasts an electric range of up to 530 km, with a consumption of 24 kWh/100 km. This positions it well for both urban commutes and longer journeys.
Conversely, the Volvo EX90 edges ahead in range with offerings of 580 km and 614 km depending on the battery variant selected. It also demonstrates competitive efficiency with levels between 19.9 kWh and 20.8 kWh/100 km. The larger battery options available in the EX90, reaching up to 107 kWh, provide flexibility for those needing extended driving range without frequent charging stops.
The BYD Tang comfortably seats seven occupants, making it an ideal choice for families or those requiring extra space. The interior design combines functionality with modern aesthetics, featuring a trunk capacity of 235 liters, accommodating luggage for trips and daily needs.
In contrast, the Volvo EX90 offers configurations with 5 or 6 seats, with a trunk capacity that starts at 310 liters. The interior is crafted with premium materials that reflect Volvo's commitment to luxury and comfort. The minimalistic Scandinavian design ethos is prominent throughout, adding to the overall appeal.
Both vehicles emphasize the integration of advanced technology, enhancing safety, convenience, and driving experience. The BYD Tang features an intuitive infotainment system with connectivity options, allowing drivers to stay connected with ease. Additionally, its safety features aim to create a secure environment for all passengers.
The Volvo EX90, known for its commitment to safety, is equipped with a rich array of driver assistance technologies. Advanced sensors and a robust suite of safety features make it one of the safest SUVs on the market. The EX90's infotainment system is also cutting-edge, equipped with state-of-the-art navigation and connectivity capabilities, pushing the envelope of in-car technology.
In conclusion, choosing between the BYD Tang and the Volvo EX90 ultimately hinges on individual preferences. The Tang stands out with its robust performance and spacious interior, while the EX90 shines with its extended range and cutting-edge safety features. Both SUVs are equipped to meet the demands of today's electric vehicle market and promise to deliver thrilling driving experiences. As the market evolves, it will be fascinating to see how both brands adapt and innovate in this electrified arena.
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
BYD Tang is a bit cheaper – starting at 64,300 £ , while the Volvo EX90 costs 73,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 9,420 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Volvo EX90 is markedly more efficient: consuming 17.8 kWh/100km compared to 24 kWh/100km for the BYD Tang. That’s a difference of about 6.2 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Volvo EX90 offers somewhat more range – reaching up to 620 km, about 90 km more than the BYD Tang.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo EX90 offers noticeably more power – delivering 680 HP compared to 517 HP. That’s roughly 163 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo EX90 is a bit quicker – completing the sprint in 4.2 s, while the BYD Tang takes 4.9 s. That’s about 0.7 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo EX90 delivers markedly more torque with 870 Nm compared to 680 Nm. That’s about 190 Nm more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 7 people.
In terms of curb weight, Volvo EX90 is marginally lighter – 2,555 kg compared to 2,630 kg. The difference is around 75 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Volvo EX90 carries barely more – 585 kg compared to 575 kg. That’s a difference of about 10 kg.
The Volvo EX90 is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The BYD Tang is a bold, tech-loaded SUV that blends striking design with roomy practicality, making it equally at home on the school run and the open road. Packed with clever tech and a powertrain that mixes efficiency with eager performance, it’s a smart, value-focused pick for buyers who want electric-age comfort without the premium-brand fuss.
details
The Volvo EX90 feels like a Scandinavian fortress on wheels, combining serene luxury with smart safety features that make everyday driving remarkably calm and confident. It dresses cutting-edge electric technology in understated elegance, so buyers who want peace of mind without shouting about it will find it hard to resist.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
64,300 £
|
Price
73,700 - 91,700 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
24 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.8 - 19.3 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
530 km
|
Electric Range
570 - 620 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
7
|
Seats
6 - 7
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,630 kg
|
Curb weight
2,555 - 2,764 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
235 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
4,970 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,955 mm
|
Width
1,964 mm
|
|
Height
1,745 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,655 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
575 kg
|
Payload
544 - 585 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
517 HP
|
Power HP
333 - 680 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.2 - 6.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
190 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
680 Nm
|
Torque
480 - 870 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
380 kW
|
Power kW
245 - 500 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024
|
Model Year
2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
BYD
|
Brand
Volvo
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España