Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Alpine A290 vs Mercedes EQA – Which model is better for everyday use?
Both models have their strengths – but which one suits you more?
Compare performance, efficiency, price and space directly: Alpine A290 or Mercedes EQA?
A290
@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Alpine A290 has a noticeable advantage in terms of price – it starts at 33200 £, while the Mercedes EQA costs 44200 £. That’s a price difference of around 11066 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Mercedes EQA: with 14.40 kWh per 100 km, it’s minimal more efficient than the Alpine A290 with 15.80 kWh. That’s a difference of about 1.40 kWh.
As for range, the Mercedes EQA performs noticeable better – achieving up to 561 km, about 181 km more than the Alpine A290.
EQA
@ Mercedes-Benz Group Media
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes EQA has a evident edge – offering 292 HP compared to 218 HP. That’s roughly 74 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mercedes EQA is slight quicker – completing the sprint in 6 s, while the Alpine A290 takes 6.40 s. That’s about 0.40 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Alpine A290 performs slight better – reaching 170 km/h, while the Mercedes EQA tops out at 160 km/h. The difference is around 10 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Mercedes EQA pulls significantly stronger with 520 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 220 Nm difference.
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Alpine A290 is noticeable lighter – 1479 kg compared to 2045 kg. The difference is around 566 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Mercedes EQA offers minimal more room – 340 L compared to 326 L. That’s a difference of about 14 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Mercedes EQA performs to a small extent better – up to 1320 L, which is about 214 L more than the Alpine A290.
When it comes to payload, Alpine A290 hardly perceptible takes the win – 471 kg compared to 425 kg. That’s a difference of about 46 kg.
Who wins the race?
The Mercedes EQA proves to be dominates this comparison and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Mercedes EQA is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
from about £44,200
@ Mercedes-Benz Group Media
Mercedes EQA
Alpine A290
The Alpine A290 embodies a thrilling blend of modern design and exhilarating performance, capturing the spirit of the brand's racing heritage. With its agile handling and responsive drive, this compact vehicle promises an engaging experience both on the road and the track. Inside, it features a driver-focused cockpit that seamlessly integrates technology and comfort, making every journey an adventure.
details
@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
Mercedes EQA
The Mercedes-Benz EQA presents a refined blend of elegance and electric performance, perfectly suited for urban environments. Its sleek and modern design emphasises aerodynamic efficiency while providing a sumptuous interior that epitomises luxury and comfort. With advanced technology seamlessly integrated into its user-friendly interface, the EQA ensures a connected and enjoyable driving experience.
details
@ Mercedes-Benz Group Media
@ Mercedes-Benz Group Media
@ Mercedes-Benz Group Media
@ Mercedes-Benz Group Media
Alpine A290
Mercedes EQA
|
@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
|
@ Mercedes-Benz Group Media
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
33200 - 39600 £
|
Price
44200 - 57400 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.8 - 16.5 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.4 - 16.9 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
364 - 380 km
|
Electric Range
476 - 561 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
70.50 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1479 kg
|
Curb weight
2045 - 2115 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
326 L
|
Trunk capacity
340 L
|
|
Length
3997 mm
|
Length
4463 mm
|
|
Width
1823 mm
|
Width
1834 mm
|
|
Height
1512 mm
|
Height
1608 - 1613 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1106 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1320 L
|
|
Payload
471 kg
|
Payload
425 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
-
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
177 - 218 HP
|
Power HP
190 - 292 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6 - 8.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 170 km/h
|
Max Speed
160 km/h
|
|
Torque
285 - 300 Nm
|
Torque
385 - 520 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
130 - 160 kW
|
Power kW
140 - 215 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Alpine
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
Is the Alpine A290 offered with different drivetrains?
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.