The Mercedes EQA and Volvo EX40 represent two distinct approaches to the compact electric SUV segment, each showcasing their brand’s unique philosophy. While the EQA excels in luxury and advanced technology, offering a seamless blend of comfort and performance, the EX40 prioritizes sustainability with its eco-friendly materials and innovative design. Ultimately, buyers seeking a stylish and versatile electric vehicle will find compelling reasons to consider both options, each delivering impressive capabilities on the road.
In the realm of electric SUVs, the Mercedes EQA and Volvo EX40 present themselves as two compelling options, each showcasing unique features and innovations. As both models continue to gain traction in the market, we dive into a detailed comparison of their technical specifications, performance, and technologies to help potential buyers determine which is the better choice for their needs.
The Mercedes EQA offers a range of power outputs, with options ranging from 190 to 292 HP. It features an efficient electric drivetrain with a smooth automatic transmission and a reduction gearbox. Depending on the variant, the EQA can achieve an impressive 0-100 km/h acceleration in as little as 6 seconds, making it not just eco-friendly but also quite spirited.
On the other hand, the Volvo EX40 raises the bar slightly with its maximum power output of up to 408 HP in its highest performance variant. Its acceleration capabilities are formidable, clocking in at just 4.8 seconds for the sprint from 0 to 100 km/h. Such performance is particularly appealing for those seeking a blend of luxury and sportiness in their electric SUV.
When it comes to electric range, the Mercedes EQA impresses with figures reaching up to 561 km, depending on the battery capacity and model variant. Its optimized energy consumption ranges from 14.4 kWh to 16.9 kWh per 100 km, allowing for longer trips with fewer charging stops.
Meanwhile, the Volvo EX40 offers a competitive electric range of up to 576 km in some variants. However, its consumption is slightly higher, with figures around 16.6 to 17.5 kWh per 100 km. Both vehicles are equipped with large battery capacities (66.5 to 70.5 kWh for the EQA and 67 to 79 kWh for the EX40), ensuring that neither model falls short on long-distance capabilities.
The Mercedes EQA comes with a modern interior characteristic of the luxury brand, featuring spacious seating for five passengers and a trunk capacity of 340 liters. It's designed with comfort in mind and comes equipped with advanced infotainment systems.
Volvo's EX40 slightly edges out in cargo space with a trunk capacity of 410 liters. The interior is elegantly minimalist, emphasizing comfort and usability, along with the latest tech features to enhance the driving experience. Both brands provide premium materials and thoughtful design, catering to customers looking for refinement and style.
Safety is paramount in both models. The Mercedes EQA is laden with innovative driver assistance systems, including advanced lane-keeping assist and adaptive cruise control, designed to make driving easier and safer.
Volvo, known for its emphasis on safety features, integrates numerous intelligent systems in the EX40. With a focus on accident prevention and occupant protection, this SUV boasts a suite of safety technology designed to identify hazards and potentially avoid collisions altogether.
Choosing between the Mercedes EQA and Volvo EX40 ultimately depends on individual priorities. If performance, a luxurious driving experience, and superior power are key factors, the Volvo EX40 stands out as a top contender. However, for those who prioritize range, efficiency, and a prestigious brand experience, the Mercedes EQA may be the preferable choice.
As electric vehicles continue to evolve, both the EQA and EX40 embody innovation and sustainability, ensuring a bright future for the automotive industry. Given their advanced technologies and remarkable capabilities, potential buyers would do well to consider both options carefully as they embark on their electric journey.
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
---|---|
Price
about 43500 - 57400
£
|
Price
about 42800 - 57800
£
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.4 - 16.9
kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.6 - 17.6
kWh
|
Electric Range
458 - 561
km
|
Electric Range
479 - 576
km
|
Battery Capacity
66.5 - 70.5
kWh
|
Battery Capacity
67 - 79
kWh
|
co2
0
g/km
|
co2
0
g/km
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
Curb weight
2045 - 2115
kg
|
Curb weight
2040 - 2170
kg
|
Trunk capacity
340
L
|
Trunk capacity
410
L
|
Length
4463
mm
|
Length
4440
mm
|
Width
1834
mm
|
Width
1863
mm
|
Height
1608 - 1613
mm
|
Height
1647
mm
|
Payload
425
kg
|
Payload
430 - 480
kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Power HP
190 - 292
HP
|
Power HP
238 - 408
HP
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6 - 8.6
s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 7.3
s
|
Max Speed
160
km/h
|
Max Speed
180
km/h
|
Torque
385 - 520
Nm
|
Torque
420 - 670
Nm
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Power kW
140 - 215
kW
|
Power kW
175 - 325
kW
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Top speed
160
km/h
|
Top speed
180
km/h
|
General |
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2024
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
Brand
Volvo
|
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.