@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
@ Mitsubishi Motors Corporation
VS

Alpine A290 vs Mitsubishi Space Star – Performance, range & efficiency compared

Everyday use, family trips or long-distance drives – here’s where the differences show.
Discover whether Alpine A290 or Mitsubishi Space Star fits your lifestyle better.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

A290 @ Alpine / Renault Group Media

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Mitsubishi Space Star has a significantly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 11600 £, while the Alpine A290 costs 33200 £. That’s a price difference of around 21523 £.

Space Star @ Mitsubishi Motors Corporation

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Alpine A290 has a clearly edge – offering 218 HP compared to 71 HP. That’s roughly 147 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Alpine A290 is decisively quicker – completing the sprint in 6.40 s, while the Mitsubishi Space Star takes 14.10 s. That’s about 7.70 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Alpine A290 performs slight better – reaching 170 km/h, while the Mitsubishi Space Star tops out at 167 km/h. The difference is around 3 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Alpine A290 pulls decisively stronger with 300 Nm compared to 102 Nm. That’s about 198 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Mitsubishi Space Star is decisively lighter – 940 kg compared to 1479 kg. The difference is around 539 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Alpine A290 offers noticeable more room – 326 L compared to 235 L. That’s a difference of about 91 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Alpine A290 performs somewhat better – up to 1106 L, which is about 194 L more than the Mitsubishi Space Star.

When it comes to payload, Alpine A290 to a small extent takes the win – 471 kg compared to 400 kg. That’s a difference of about 71 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Alpine A290 shows itself to be is largely superior and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £33,200
A290 @ Alpine / Renault Group Media

Alpine A290

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 177 - 218 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 15.8 - 16.5 kWh
  • Electric Range : 364 - 380 km

Alpine A290

5 (1)
rate

The Alpine A290 embodies a thrilling blend of modern design and exhilarating performance, capturing the spirit of the brand's racing heritage. With its agile handling and responsive drive, this compact vehicle promises an engaging experience both on the road and the track. Inside, it features a driver-focused cockpit that seamlessly integrates technology and comfort, making every journey an adventure.

details

Mitsubishi Space Star

The Mitsubishi Space Star offers a compact yet surprisingly spacious experience, making it an ideal choice for urban dwellers who need agility and comfort. Its sleek design is complemented by a range of vibrant colour options, adding a touch of flair to everyday commutes. With a focus on efficiency and practicality, the Space Star combines a user-friendly interface with modern technology to ensure a smooth driving experience.

details
Alpine A290
Mitsubishi Space Star
A290 @ Alpine / Renault Group Media
Space Star @ Mitsubishi Motors Corporation

Costs and Consumption

Price
33200 - 39600 £
Price
11600 - 18700 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.5 L
Consumption kWh/100km
15.8 - 16.5 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
364 - 380 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
112 - 125 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
35 L

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1479 kg
Curb weight
940 - 1011 kg
Trunk capacity
326 L
Trunk capacity
209 - 235 L
Length
3997 mm
Length
3845 mm
Width
1823 mm
Width
1665 mm
Height
1512 mm
Height
1505 mm
Max trunk capacity
1106 L
Max trunk capacity
881 - 912 L
Payload
471 kg
Payload
359 - 400 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
-
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
177 - 218 HP
Power HP
71 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
14.1 - 15.8 s
Max Speed
160 - 170 km/h
Max Speed
163 - 167 km/h
Torque
285 - 300 Nm
Torque
102 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
3
Power kW
130 - 160 kW
Power kW
52 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1193 cm3

General

Model Year
2024
Model Year
2020 - 2022
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D
Brand
Alpine
Brand
Mitsubishi
Is the Alpine A290 offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.