Two cars, one duel: Mitsubishi Space Star meets Toyota Aygo.
Which one wins in performance, efficiency and value for money? Find out now!
In the world of compact cars, the Mitsubishi Space Star and Toyota Aygo are two prominent players vying for the attention of urban drivers. Both models stand out with their unique characteristics, appealing designs, and efficient performance. In this article, we will delve into these vehicles from a technical perspective and explore their innovations, helping prospective buyers make an informed choice.
The Mitsubishi Space Star, a hatchback, measures 3845 mm in length, 1665 mm in width, and 1505 mm in height. Its compact dimensions make it well-suited for city driving, allowing for easy maneuvering and parking.
On the other hand, the Toyota Aygo, an SUV, features a slightly shorter length of 3700 mm but is wider at 1740 mm and taller at 1510 mm. This design gives the Aygo a more robust appearance and allows for a spacious interior, despite its smaller overall footprint.
Both vehicles are equipped with petrol engines, offering a good blend of performance and efficiency. The Mitsubishi Space Star's 1.2-liter engine produces 71 HP, delivering a torque of 102 Nm. It can be paired with a manual gearbox or a CVT (Continuously Variable Transmission). With a 0-100 km/h acceleration time of 14.1 seconds, it can reach a top speed of 167 km/h.
Conversely, the Toyota Aygo boasts a slightly more powerful output of 72 HP from its 1.0-liter engine, generating 93 Nm of torque. Similar transmission options are available, and it completes the 0-100 km/h sprint in 15.5 seconds, with a maximum speed of 158 km/h. Both cars come with front-wheel drive, pairing efficiency with adequate performance for everyday commutes.
Fuel economy is a crucial consideration for urban drivers, and both models perform admirably in this department. The Space Star offers fuel consumption figures ranging from 4.9 to 5.5 L/100km, while the Aygo presents marginally better efficiency, achieving figures between 4.8 to 4.9 L/100km. With both vehicles equipped with a fuel tank capacity of 35 liters, they are well-positioned for longer trips without frequent refueling.
Practicality is another essential feature for city cars. The Mitsubishi Space Star has a trunk capacity of up to 235 liters, making it suitable for grocery runs or a weekend getaway. In comparison, the Toyota Aygo offers a slightly smaller trunk space of 231 liters, which still provides adequate room for daily essentials.
Both cars are designed with a 5-door configuration, enhancing accessibility for passengers and cargo alike. However, the Space Star seats five occupants comfortably, while the Aygo can accommodate four adults, which may influence buyer preference based on space needs.
With increasing emphasis on environmental friendliness, both the Space Star and Aygo offer low CO2 emissions. The Space Star produces between 112 to 125 g/km CO2, categorizing it in the C and D efficiency classes. In contrast, the Aygo stands out with emissions between 108 to 112 g/km, placing it firmly in the C efficiency class, which could appeal to eco-conscious drivers.
In conclusion, the Mitsubishi Space Star and the Toyota Aygo have their own strengths, catering to different driver preferences. The Space Star impresses with its power, space, and a slight edge in performance, while the Aygo offers better fuel efficiency and lower emissions. As urbanization continues to grow, both vehicles are well-equipped to serve commuters seeking an efficient and compact solution. Ultimately, the choice may boil down to personal preference and brand loyalty, making a test drive an essential next step in deciding between these two noteworthy contenders.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Mitsubishi Space Star has a distinct advantage in terms of price – it starts at 11600 £, while the Toyota Aygo costs 15500 £. That’s a price difference of around 3857 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Toyota Aygo manages with 4.80 L and is therefore barely noticeable more efficient than the Mitsubishi Space Star with 4.90 L. The difference is about 0.10 L per 100 km.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Toyota Aygo has a barely noticeable edge – offering 72 HP compared to 71 HP. That’s roughly 1 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mitsubishi Space Star is slight quicker – completing the sprint in 14.10 s, while the Toyota Aygo takes 15.50 s. That’s about 1.40 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Mitsubishi Space Star performs hardly perceptible better – reaching 167 km/h, while the Toyota Aygo tops out at 158 km/h. The difference is around 9 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Mitsubishi Space Star pulls slight stronger with 102 Nm compared to 93 Nm. That’s about 9 Nm difference.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Seats: Mitsubishi Space Star offers somewhat more seating capacity – 5 vs 4.
In curb weight, Mitsubishi Space Star is hardly perceptible lighter – 940 kg compared to 1015 kg. The difference is around 75 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Mitsubishi Space Star offers hardly perceptible more room – 235 L compared to 231 L. That’s a difference of about 4 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Mitsubishi Space Star performs barely noticeable better – up to 912 L, which is about 83 L more than the Toyota Aygo.
When it comes to payload, Mitsubishi Space Star a bit takes the win – 400 kg compared to 345 kg. That’s a difference of about 55 kg.
Overall, the Mitsubishi Space Star shows itself to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.
@ Mitsubishi Motors Corporation
The Mitsubishi Space Star offers a compact yet surprisingly spacious experience, making it an ideal choice for urban dwellers who need agility and comfort. Its sleek design is complemented by a range of vibrant colour options, adding a touch of flair to everyday commutes. With a focus on efficiency and practicality, the Space Star combines a user-friendly interface with modern technology to ensure a smooth driving experience.
details
@ Mitsubishi Motors Corporation
@ Mitsubishi Motors Corporation
@ Mitsubishi Motors Corporation
@ Mitsubishi Motors Corporation
The Toyota Aygo presents itself as a compact city car, perfect for navigating tight urban spaces with ease. Its stylish design is complemented by a vibrant variety of colour options, making it a standout choice for those looking to express their individuality. Inside, the Aygo offers a comfortable and functional cabin, equipped with modern features that enhance the overall driving experience.
details
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
|
@ Mitsubishi Motors Corporation
|
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
11600 - 18700 £
|
Price
15500 - 22100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.5 L
|
Consumption L/100km
4.8 - 4.9 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
112 - 125 g/km
|
co2
108 - 111 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
35 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
35 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
4
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
940 - 1011 kg
|
Curb weight
1015 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
209 - 235 L
|
Trunk capacity
231 L
|
|
Length
3845 mm
|
Length
3700 mm
|
|
Width
1665 mm
|
Width
1740 mm
|
|
Height
1505 mm
|
Height
1510 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
881 - 912 L
|
Max trunk capacity
829 L
|
|
Payload
359 - 400 kg
|
Payload
345 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
71 HP
|
Power HP
72 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
14.1 - 15.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
15.5 - 15.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
163 - 167 km/h
|
Max Speed
151 - 158 km/h
|
|
Torque
102 Nm
|
Torque
93 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
52 kW
|
Power kW
53 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1193 cm3
|
Engine capacity
998 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2020 - 2022
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
|
|
Brand
Mitsubishi
|
Brand
Toyota
|
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España