Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Mitsubishi Space Star vs Toyota Aygo - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (71 HP vs 72 HP), boot space and price (11600 £ vs 15500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mitsubishi Space Star or Toyota Aygo?
Space Star
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Mitsubishi Space Star has a distinct advantage in terms of price – it starts at 11600 £ , while the Toyota Aygo costs 15500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3857 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Toyota Aygo manages with 4.80 L and is therefore barely noticeable more efficient than the Mitsubishi Space Star with 4.90 L. The difference is about 0.10 L per 100 km.
Aygo
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Toyota Aygo has a barely noticeable edge – offering 72 HP compared to 71 HP. That’s roughly 1 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mitsubishi Space Star is slight quicker – completing the sprint in 14.10 s, while the Toyota Aygo takes 15.50 s. That’s about 1.40 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Mitsubishi Space Star performs hardly perceptible better – reaching 167 km/h, while the Toyota Aygo tops out at 158 km/h. The difference is around 9 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Mitsubishi Space Star pulls slight stronger with 102 Nm compared to 93 Nm. That’s about 9 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Space Star
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Seats: Mitsubishi Space Star offers somewhat more seating capacity – 5 vs 4.
In curb weight, Mitsubishi Space Star is hardly perceptible lighter – 940 kg compared to 1015 kg. The difference is around 75 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Mitsubishi Space Star offers hardly perceptible more room – 235 L compared to 231 L. That’s a difference of about 4 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Mitsubishi Space Star performs barely noticeable better – up to 912 L, which is about 83 L more than the Toyota Aygo.
When it comes to payload, Mitsubishi Space Star a bit takes the win – 400 kg compared to 345 kg. That’s a difference of about 55 kg.
Who comes out on top?
Overall, the Mitsubishi Space Star shows itself to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.
from about £11,600
Mitsubishi Space Star
Mitsubishi Space Star
Toyota Aygo
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Mitsubishi Space Star
The Mitsubishi Space Star is a tidy, no-nonsense city car that squeezes surprising interior space into a compact, easy-to-park package. It's not a thrill-seeker's toy, but for buyers after low running costs, fuss-free reliability and sensible day-to-day practicality, it's a clever and cheerful choice that keeps your wallet and nerves happy.
details
Toyota Aygo
5 (1 Reviews)
The Aygo is a cheeky city car that turns congested streets into a playground, with bold styling and sprightly manners that make parking a pleasure rather than a pain. Economical to run and surprisingly well equipped for its size, the Aygo is a smart choice for urban buyers who want personality without a premium price and a car that brings a smile to the daily commute.
details
Mitsubishi Space Star
Toyota Aygo
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
11600 - 18700 £
|
Price
15500 - 22100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.5 L
|
Consumption L/100km
4.8 - 4.9 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
112 - 125 g/km
|
co2
108 - 111 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
35 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
35 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
4
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
940 - 1011 kg
|
Curb weight
1015 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
209 - 235 L
|
Trunk capacity
231 L
|
|
Length
3845 mm
|
Length
3700 mm
|
|
Width
1665 mm
|
Width
1740 mm
|
|
Height
1505 mm
|
Height
1510 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
881 - 912 L
|
Max trunk capacity
829 L
|
|
Payload
359 - 400 kg
|
Payload
345 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
71 HP
|
Power HP
72 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
14.1 - 15.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
15.5 - 15.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
163 - 167 km/h
|
Max Speed
151 - 158 km/h
|
|
Torque
102 Nm
|
Torque
93 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
52 kW
|
Power kW
53 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1193 cm3
|
Engine capacity
998 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2020 - 2022
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
|
|
Brand
Mitsubishi
|
Brand
Toyota
|
What drivetrain options does the Mitsubishi Space Star have?
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.