Compare performance (71 HP vs 116 HP), boot space and price (11,600 £ vs 18,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mitsubishi Space Star or Toyota Aygo?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
In the world of compact cars, the Mitsubishi Space Star and Toyota Aygo are two prominent players vying for the attention of urban drivers. Both models stand out with their unique characteristics, appealing designs, and efficient performance. In this article, we will delve into these vehicles from a technical perspective and explore their innovations, helping prospective buyers make an informed choice.
The Mitsubishi Space Star, a hatchback, measures 3845 mm in length, 1665 mm in width, and 1505 mm in height. Its compact dimensions make it well-suited for city driving, allowing for easy maneuvering and parking.
On the other hand, the Toyota Aygo, an SUV, features a slightly shorter length of 3700 mm but is wider at 1740 mm and taller at 1510 mm. This design gives the Aygo a more robust appearance and allows for a spacious interior, despite its smaller overall footprint.
Both vehicles are equipped with petrol engines, offering a good blend of performance and efficiency. The Mitsubishi Space Star's 1.2-liter engine produces 71 HP, delivering a torque of 102 Nm. It can be paired with a manual gearbox or a CVT (Continuously Variable Transmission). With a 0-100 km/h acceleration time of 14.1 seconds, it can reach a top speed of 167 km/h.
Conversely, the Toyota Aygo boasts a slightly more powerful output of 72 HP from its 1.0-liter engine, generating 93 Nm of torque. Similar transmission options are available, and it completes the 0-100 km/h sprint in 15.5 seconds, with a maximum speed of 158 km/h. Both cars come with front-wheel drive, pairing efficiency with adequate performance for everyday commutes.
Fuel economy is a crucial consideration for urban drivers, and both models perform admirably in this department. The Space Star offers fuel consumption figures ranging from 4.9 to 5.5 L/100km, while the Aygo presents marginally better efficiency, achieving figures between 4.8 to 4.9 L/100km. With both vehicles equipped with a fuel tank capacity of 35 liters, they are well-positioned for longer trips without frequent refueling.
Practicality is another essential feature for city cars. The Mitsubishi Space Star has a trunk capacity of up to 235 liters, making it suitable for grocery runs or a weekend getaway. In comparison, the Toyota Aygo offers a slightly smaller trunk space of 231 liters, which still provides adequate room for daily essentials.
Both cars are designed with a 5-door configuration, enhancing accessibility for passengers and cargo alike. However, the Space Star seats five occupants comfortably, while the Aygo can accommodate four adults, which may influence buyer preference based on space needs.
With increasing emphasis on environmental friendliness, both the Space Star and Aygo offer low CO2 emissions. The Space Star produces between 112 to 125 g/km CO2, categorizing it in the C and D efficiency classes. In contrast, the Aygo stands out with emissions between 108 to 112 g/km, placing it firmly in the C efficiency class, which could appeal to eco-conscious drivers.
In conclusion, the Mitsubishi Space Star and the Toyota Aygo have their own strengths, catering to different driver preferences. The Space Star impresses with its power, space, and a slight edge in performance, while the Aygo offers better fuel efficiency and lower emissions. As urbanization continues to grow, both vehicles are well-equipped to serve commuters seeking an efficient and compact solution. Ultimately, the choice may boil down to personal preference and brand loyalty, making a test drive an essential next step in deciding between these two noteworthy contenders.
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Mitsubishi Space Star is significantly cheaper – starting at 11,600 £ , while the Toyota Aygo costs 18,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 7,200 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Toyota Aygo uses 3.7 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Mitsubishi Space Star with 4.9 L/100km. The difference is about 1.2 L/100km.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Toyota Aygo offers visibly more power – delivering 116 HP compared to 71 HP. That’s roughly 45 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Toyota Aygo is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 9.2 s, while the Mitsubishi Space Star takes 14.1 s. That’s about 4.9 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Toyota Aygo delivers somewhat more torque with 120 Nm compared to 102 Nm. That’s about 18 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Mitsubishi Space Star offers more seats – 5 vs 4.
In terms of curb weight, Mitsubishi Space Star is a bit lighter – 940 kg compared to 1,090 kg. The difference is around 150 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Mitsubishi Space Star offers only slightly more boot space – 235 L compared to 231 L. That’s a difference of about 4 L.
When it comes to payload, the Toyota Aygo carries marginally more – 420 kg compared to 400 kg. That’s a difference of about 20 kg.
The Toyota Aygo is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Mitsubishi Space Star is a tidy, no-nonsense city car that squeezes surprising interior space into a compact, easy-to-park package. It's not a thrill-seeker's toy, but for buyers after low running costs, fuss-free reliability and sensible day-to-day practicality, it's a clever and cheerful choice that keeps your wallet and nerves happy.
details
The Aygo is a cheeky city car that turns congested streets into a playground, with bold styling and sprightly manners that make parking a pleasure rather than a pain. Economical to run and surprisingly well equipped for its size, the Aygo is a smart choice for urban buyers who want personality without a premium price and a car that brings a smile to the daily commute.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
11,600 - 18,700 £
|
Price
18,800 - 24,300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.5 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
3.7 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
112 - 125 g/km
|
co2
85 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
35 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
4
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
940 - 1,011 kg
|
Curb weight
1,090 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
209 - 235 L
|
Trunk capacity
231 L
|
|
Length
3,845 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,665 mm
|
Width
1,740 mm
|
|
Height
1,505 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
881 - 912 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
359 - 400 kg
|
Payload
420 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT
|
Transmission Detail
CVT
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
71 HP
|
Power HP
116 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
14.1 - 15.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
163 - 167 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
102 Nm
|
Torque
120 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
52 kW
|
Power kW
85 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,193 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,490 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,020 - 2,022
|
Model Year
2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
|
|
Brand
Mitsubishi
|
Brand
Toyota
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España