Compare performance (116 HP vs 116 HP), boot space and price (21400 £ vs 18800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda 2 Hybrid or Toyota Aygo?
In the bustling world of compact cars, the Mazda 2 Hybrid and the Toyota Aygo stand out for their innovation and practicality. Designed to navigate urban landscapes with ease, both vehicles offer distinct features that cater to different needs and preferences. Here's a closer look at these nimble city cars and what they bring to the table.
The Mazda 2 Hybrid is an impressive entry in the hatchback segment, featuring a full hybrid engine that delivers a robust 116 HP (85 kW). This powertrain utilizes a continuously variable transmission (CVT) for seamless gear transitions and accelerates from 0 to 100 km/h in a brisk 9.7 seconds. With a top speed of 175 km/h, the Mazda 2 Hybrid is both energy-efficient and zippy for city driving, boasting a fuel consumption of just 3.8 to 4 L/100 km and CO2 emissions ranging from 87 to 93 g/km.
On the other hand, the Toyota Aygo, classified as an urban SUV, runs on a petrol engine producing 72 HP (53 kW). Available with both manual and CVT options, the Aygo offers a more modest acceleration time of 15.5 to 15.6 seconds to reach 100 km/h, with a top speed between 151 and 158 km/h. Its fuel consumption stands at 4.8 to 4.9 L/100 km, alongside CO2 emissions between 108 and 112 g/km, reflecting its straightforward engineering approach.
The Mazda 2 Hybrid offers generous space for its class, seating up to five passengers comfortably. It boasts a trunk capacity of 286 liters, making it practical for small family outings or daily errands. Mazda’s focus on driver and passenger comfort is evident in the thoughtful interior design and spaciousness.
Contrastingly, the Toyota Aygo is tailored for four passengers, with a smaller trunk capacity of 231 liters, emphasizing nimbleness and ease of parking in tight urban spaces. Despite its compact size, the Aygo holds its own in terms of offering a practical yet stylish interior for city dwellers.
The Mazda 2 Hybrid’s dimensions of 3940 mm in length, 1745 mm in width, and 1505 mm in height contribute to its streamlined and agile profile. Its curb weight of 1180 kg and payload capacity of 435 kg indicate a well-balanced vehicle optimized for efficiency and performance.
Toyota’s Aygo measures 3700 mm in length, slightly shorter than its Mazda counterpart, with a width of 1740 mm and height of 1510 mm. These dimensions, paired with a lighter curb weight of 1015 kg and a payload of 345 kg, underscore the Aygo’s emphasis on lightweight maneuverability.
Mazda’s hybrid technology offers impressive fuel economy and lower emissions, securing a CO2 efficiency class B. This positions the Mazda 2 Hybrid as a viable choice for environmentally conscious drivers who are unwilling to compromise on performance.
The Toyota Aygo holds a CO2 efficiency class C, reflecting its slightly higher emissions. Nevertheless, it remains an efficient choice for those prioritizing low running costs and practical urban mobility.
In conclusion, the choice between the Mazda 2 Hybrid and the Toyota Aygo boils down to individual priorities. The Mazda 2 Hybrid is a strong contender for those who value hybrid efficiency, a higher power output, and a capacity for more passengers. The Toyota Aygo, with its compact SUV stance, offers an appealing solution for those looking for economical, agile city transportation. Both models reflect their brands’ commitments to innovation and catering to the modern urban driver.
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Toyota Aygo has a to a small extent advantage in terms of price – it starts at 18800 £ , while the Mazda 2 Hybrid costs 21400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2572 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Toyota Aygo manages with 3.70 L and is therefore slight more efficient than the Mazda 2 Hybrid with 3.80 L. The difference is about 0.10 L per 100 km.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
Both models deliver identical power – 116 HP each.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Toyota Aygo is barely noticeable quicker – completing the sprint in 9.20 s, while the Mazda 2 Hybrid takes 9.70 s. That’s about 0.50 s faster.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Mazda 2 Hybrid offers a bit more seating capacity – 5 vs 4.
In curb weight, Toyota Aygo is hardly perceptible lighter – 1090 kg compared to 1180 kg. The difference is around 90 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Mazda 2 Hybrid offers somewhat more room – 286 L compared to 231 L. That’s a difference of about 55 L.
When it comes to payload, Mazda 2 Hybrid barely noticeable takes the win – 435 kg compared to 420 kg. That’s a difference of about 15 kg.
The Mazda 2 Hybrid holds a very small edge in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Mazda 2 Hybrid brings Mazda’s trademark driving flair to the city, combining smooth, efficient running with unexpectedly eager handling that keeps short trips engaging. Compact, nicely finished and sensible on running costs, it’s a clever choice for buyers who want the economy of a small car without sacrificing cabin quality or personality.
details
The Aygo is a cheeky city car that turns congested streets into a playground, with bold styling and sprightly manners that make parking a pleasure rather than a pain. Economical to run and surprisingly well equipped for its size, the Aygo is a smart choice for urban buyers who want personality without a premium price and a car that brings a smile to the daily commute.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
21400 - 28200 £
|
Price
18800 - 24300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
3.8 - 4 L
|
Consumption L/100km
3.70 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
87 - 93 g/km
|
co2
85 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
4
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1180 kg
|
Curb weight
1090 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
286 L
|
Trunk capacity
231 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1745 mm
|
Width
1740 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
435 kg
|
Payload
420 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
CVT
|
Transmission Detail
CVT
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
116 HP
|
Power HP
116 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.70 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.20 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
-
|
Torque
120 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
85 kW
|
Power kW
85 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1490 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1490 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Toyota
|
The Mazda 2 Hybrid is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España