VS

Alpine A290 vs Porsche Boxster – Performance, range & efficiency compared

Two cars, one duel: Alpine A290 meets Porsche Boxster.
Which one wins in performance, efficiency and value for money? Find out now!

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

A290 @ media.alpinecars.com

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Alpine A290 has a decisively advantage in terms of price – it starts at 33200 £, while the Porsche Boxster costs 136000 £. That’s a price difference of around 102857 £.

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Porsche Boxster has a convincingly edge – offering 500 HP compared to 218 HP. That’s roughly 282 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Porsche Boxster is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.40 s, while the Alpine A290 takes 6.40 s. That’s about 3 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Porsche Boxster performs clearly better – reaching 308 km/h, while the Alpine A290 tops out at 170 km/h. The difference is around 138 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Porsche Boxster pulls noticeable stronger with 450 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 150 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Alpine A290 offers convincingly more seating capacity – 5 vs 2.

In curb weight, Alpine A290 is slight lighter – 1479 kg compared to 1485 kg. The difference is around 6 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Alpine A290 offers clearly more room – 326 L compared to 122 L. That’s a difference of about 204 L.

When it comes to payload, Alpine A290 clearly takes the win – 471 kg compared to 270 kg. That’s a difference of about 201 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Alpine A290 proves to be dominates this comparison and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Alpine A290 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £33,200
A290 @ media.alpinecars.com

Alpine A290

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 177 - 218 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 15.8 - 16.5 kWh
  • Electric Range : 364 - 380 km
details

Alpine A290

5 (1)
rate

The Alpine A290 embodies a thrilling blend of modern design and exhilarating performance, capturing the spirit of the brand's racing heritage. With its agile handling and responsive drive, this compact vehicle promises an engaging experience both on the road and the track. Inside, it features a driver-focused cockpit that seamlessly integrates technology and comfort, making every journey an adventure.

details
alpinea290 @ media.alpinecars.com

Porsche Boxster

The Porsche Boxster epitomizes the essence of a pure, open-top driving experience with its mid-engine roadster design. Known for its agile handling and dynamic performance, the Boxster seamlessly blends luxury with thrilling precision on the road. Its unmistakable styling and superior engineering continue to captivate automotive enthusiasts who crave a visceral connection to the art of driving.

details

Top Car Comparisons

Alpine A290
Renault R5
VS
In the exciting showdown between the Alpine A290 and the iconic Renault R5, enthusiasts are treated to a fascinating blend of modern engineering and classic charm. The A290 boasts cutting-edge performance and advanced technology, while the R5 captivates with its nostalgic allure and timeless …
Alpine A290
CUPRA Born
VS
The Alpine A290 and CUPRA Born compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Alpine A290
Porsche Boxster
A290 @ media.alpinecars.com

Costs and Consumption
Price
33200 - 39600 £
Price
136000 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
12.70 L
Consumption kWh/100km
15.8 - 16.5 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
364 - 380 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
288 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
54 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
Roadster
Seats
5
Seats
2
Doors
5
Doors
2
Curb weight
1479 kg
Curb weight
1485 kg
Trunk capacity
326 L
Trunk capacity
122 L
Length
3997 mm
Length
4418 mm
Width
1823 mm
Width
1822 mm
Height
1512 mm
Height
1252 mm
Max trunk capacity
1106 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
471 kg
Payload
270 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
-
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
177 - 218 HP
Power HP
500 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.40 s
Max Speed
160 - 170 km/h
Max Speed
308 km/h
Torque
285 - 300 Nm
Torque
450 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
6
Power kW
130 - 160 kW
Power kW
368 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
3996 cm3

General
Model Year
2024
Model Year
2023
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
Brand
Alpine
Brand
Porsche

Similar Comparisons

Alpine A290
Audi A3 Sportback
VS
Alpine A290 and Audi A3 Sportback go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Alfa Romeo Junior
Alpine A290
VS
In a thrilling showdown of compact charisma, the Alfa Romeo Junior takes on the Alpine A290 with poise and style. The Junior captivates with its timeless Italian design and sporty dynamics, appealing to those who cherish agile handling and lively road presence. In contrast, the Alpine A290 offers a …
Alpine A290
Volvo EX30
VS
In the thrilling matchup between the Alpine A290 and the Volvo EX30, driving enthusiasts will appreciate the Alpine A290 for its nimble handling and spirited performance, embodying the classic French flair in a compact hatchback form. On the other hand, the Volvo EX30 stands out with its …
Alpine A290
VW ID.3
VS
Unsure whether the Alpine A290 or the VW ID.3 is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
VW ID.3
Porsche Boxster
VS
The VW ID.3 and Porsche Boxster compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
MG Cyberster
Porsche Boxster
VS
MG Cyberster and Porsche Boxster go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Alpine A290
Fiat 500
VS
The Alpine A290 and Fiat 500 compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Alpine A290
Hyundai IONIQ 5
VS
In the showdown of electric innovations, the Alpine A290 stands out with its sporty dynamics and agile handling, appealing to driving enthusiasts who crave a thrilling ride. Conversely, the Hyundai IONIQ 5 offers a spacious interior and cutting-edge technology that make it ideal for tech-savvy …
Is the Alpine A290 offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.