VS

Alpine A290 vs SsangYong Torres – Differences & prices compared

Two cars, one duel: Alpine A290 meets SsangYong Torres.
Which one wins in performance, efficiency and value for money? Find out now!

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

A290 @ media.alpinecars.com

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Alpine A290 has a hardly perceptible advantage in terms of price – it starts at 33200 £, while the SsangYong Torres costs 33800 £. That’s a price difference of around 677 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Alpine A290: with 15.80 kWh per 100 km, it’s a bit more efficient than the SsangYong Torres with 18.70 kWh. That’s a difference of about 2.90 kWh.

As for range, the SsangYong Torres performs slightly better – achieving up to 462 km, about 82 km more than the Alpine A290.

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Alpine A290 has a hardly perceptible edge – offering 218 HP compared to 207 HP. That’s roughly 11 HP more horsepower.

In terms of top speed, the SsangYong Torres performs slightly better – reaching 194 km/h, while the Alpine A290 tops out at 170 km/h. The difference is around 24 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: SsangYong Torres pulls slightly stronger with 339 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 39 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Alpine A290 is minimal lighter – 1479 kg compared to 1498 kg. The difference is around 19 kg.

In terms of boot space, the SsangYong Torres offers clearly more room – 703 L compared to 326 L. That’s a difference of about 377 L.

In maximum load capacity, the SsangYong Torres performs distinct better – up to 1662 L, which is about 556 L more than the Alpine A290.

When it comes to payload, SsangYong Torres a bit takes the win – 552 kg compared to 471 kg. That’s a difference of about 81 kg.

Who wins the race?

The SsangYong Torres proves to be leaves the rival little chance and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
SsangYong Torres is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £33,800

SsangYong Torres

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Electric
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 163 - 207 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 7.9 - 9.1 L
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 18.70 kWh
  • Electric Range : 462 km
details

Alpine A290

The Alpine A290 embodies a thrilling blend of modern design and exhilarating performance, capturing the spirit of the brand's racing heritage. With its agile handling and responsive drive, this compact vehicle promises an engaging experience both on the road and the track. Inside, it features a driver-focused cockpit that seamlessly integrates technology and comfort, making every journey an adventure.

details
alpinea290 @ media.alpinecars.com

SsangYong Torres

The SsangYong Torres stands out with its rugged design and robust stance, ideal for adventure enthusiasts seeking a reliable companion for off-road escapades. Inside, the vehicle offers a spacious and comfortable cabin equipped with modern features to enhance the driving experience. Its performance is geared towards delivering a smooth ride, making it versatile for both city driving and rural trails.

details

Similar Comparisons

SsangYong Torres
Dacia Bigster
VS
In a head-to-head comparison between the SsangYong Torres and the Dacia Bigster, both models present appealing choices for budget-minded SUV enthusiasts. The SsangYong Torres impresses with its robust design and advanced tech features, offering a dynamic driving experience reminiscent of higher-end counterparts. On the other hand, the Dacia Bigster stands out with its rugged build and pragmatic simplicity, ideal for those who prioritize functionality and spaciousness without breaking the bank.
Alpine A290
Renault R5
VS
In the exciting showdown between the Alpine A290 and the iconic Renault R5, enthusiasts are treated to a fascinating blend of modern engineering and classic charm. The A290 boasts cutting-edge performance and advanced technology, while the R5 captivates with its nostalgic allure and timeless design. This comparison highlights the evolution of automotive innovation, showcasing how both models cater to different tastes within the vibrant hatchback segment.
Alpine A290
SsangYong Torres
A290

Costs and Consumption
Price
33200 - 39600 £
Price
33800 - 44600 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
7.9 - 9.1 L
Consumption kWh/100km
15.8 - 16.5 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
18.70 kWh
Electric Range
364 - 380 km
Electric Range
462 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 - 207 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
50 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1479 kg
Curb weight
1498 - 1618 kg
Trunk capacity
326 L
Trunk capacity
703 L
Length
3997 mm
Length
4700 mm
Width
1823 mm
Width
1890 mm
Height
1512 mm
Height
1710 mm
Max trunk capacity
1106 L
Max trunk capacity
1662 L
Payload
471 kg
Payload
552 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Petrol, Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
-
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
177 - 218 HP
Power HP
163 - 207 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Max Speed
160 - 170 km/h
Max Speed
191 - 194 km/h
Torque
285 - 300 Nm
Torque
280 - 339 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
130 - 160 kW
Power kW
120 - 152 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1497 cm3

General
Model Year
2024
Model Year
2023 - 2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, A
Brand
Alpine
Brand
SsangYong

Similar Comparisons

Alpine A290
CUPRA Born
VS
Kia Sportage
SsangYong Torres
VS
BYD Seal U
SsangYong Torres
VS
Alpine A290
Audi A3 Sportback
VS
Hyundai Tucson
SsangYong Torres
VS
SsangYong Torres
Toyota Corolla Cross
VS
Alfa Romeo Junior
Alpine A290
VS
In a thrilling showdown of compact charisma, the Alfa Romeo Junior takes on the Alpine A290 with poise and style. The Junior captivates with its timeless Italian design and sporty dynamics, appealing to those who cherish agile handling and lively road presence. In contrast, the Alpine A290 offers a modern twist on performance with its cutting-edge technology and precision engineering, drawing enthusiasts eager for a refined yet exhilarating drive.
Alpine A290
Volvo EX30
VS
In the thrilling matchup between the Alpine A290 and the Volvo EX30, driving enthusiasts will appreciate the Alpine A290 for its nimble handling and spirited performance, embodying the classic French flair in a compact hatchback form. On the other hand, the Volvo EX30 stands out with its Scandinavian sophistication, offering a cutting-edge electric powertrain and a commitment to sustainability that appeals to the eco-conscious driver. Both models showcase their unique strengths, but while the A290 attracts those seeking a dynamic drive, the EX30 caters to those prioritizing modern luxury and environmental considerations.
Is the Alpine A290 offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.