VS

Audi A3 Sportback vs Ford Mustang Mach-E comparison

Compare performance (400 HP vs 487 HP), boot space and price (27,000 £ vs 48,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi A3 Sportback or Ford Mustang Mach-E?

Audi A3 Sportback vs Ford Mustang Mach-E: Key differences

Audi A3 Sportback

3.9 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • significantly lighter
details

Ford Mustang Mach-E

3.4 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • somewhat more power
  • clearly more electric range
  • noticeably more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

A3 Sportback

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Audi A3 Sportback is clearly cheaper – starting at 27,000 £ , while the Ford Mustang Mach-E costs 48,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 21,428 £.

As for electric range, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers clearly more range – reaching up to 600 km, about 459 km more than the Audi A3 Sportback.

Mustang Mach-E

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers somewhat more power – delivering 487 HP compared to 400 HP. That’s roughly 87 HP more horsepower.

Both models accelerate almost equally fast – 3.8 s from 0 to 100 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Mustang Mach-E delivers substantially more torque with 950 Nm compared to 500 Nm. That’s about 450 Nm more.

A3 Sportback

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Audi A3 Sportback is significantly lighter – 1,360 kg compared to 2,161 kg. The difference is around 801 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers noticeably more boot space – 519 L compared to 380 L. That’s a difference of about 139 L.

When it comes to payload, the Audi A3 Sportback carries very slightly more – 480 kg compared to 450 kg. That’s a difference of about 30 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Mustang Mach-E is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £48,400
Mustang Mach-E

Ford Mustang Mach-E

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 268 - 487 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 17.7 - 21 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 470 - 600 km
Audi A3 Sportback
Ford Mustang Mach-E

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Audi A3 Sportback

The Audi A3 Sportback wraps premium materials and crisp German design into a practical hatchback package that makes daily driving feel smart rather than showy. It’s nimble in the city, composed on longer trips, and carries just enough swagger to satisfy buyers who want quality without shouting about it.

details

Ford Mustang Mach-E

The Mustang Mach-E proves an electric SUV can be both playful and practical, with the Mustang name bringing muscle-car charisma to a family-friendly package. It delivers eager performance, a comfortable cabin, and a slick infotainment setup that keeps daily driving fun — and yes, you’ll still get admiring glances at the lights.

details
Audi A3 Sportback
Ford Mustang Mach-E

Costs and Consumption

Price
27,000 - 92,900 £
Price
48,400 - 66,900 £
Consumption L/100km
1.1 - 9.3 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
17.7 - 21 kWh/100km
Electric Range
134 - 141 km
Electric Range
470 - 600 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
25 - 211 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,360 - 1,685 kg
Curb weight
2,161 - 2,351 kg
Trunk capacity
280 - 380 L
Trunk capacity
519 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,816 - 1,851 mm
Width
1,881 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
410 - 480 kg
Payload
368 - 450 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
116 - 400 HP
Power HP
268 - 487 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 10.1 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 6.2 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
220 - 500 Nm
Torque
525 - 950 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 5
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
85 - 294 kW
Power kW
197 - 358 kW
Engine capacity
1,498 - 2,480 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, F, E, G, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Audi
Brand
Ford
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.