Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Audi A3 Sportback vs Ford Tourneo Connect comparison
Compare performance (400 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (27,000 £ vs 27,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi A3 Sportback or Ford Tourneo Connect?
Audi A3 Sportback vs Ford Tourneo Connect: Key differences
A3 Sportback
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Audi A3 Sportback is barely cheaper – starting at 27,000 £ , while the Ford Tourneo Connect costs 27,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 342 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Tourneo Connect uses 0.5 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Audi A3 Sportback with 1.1 L/100km. The difference is about 0.6 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Audi A3 Sportback offers a bit more range – reaching up to 141 km, about 22 km more than the Ford Tourneo Connect.
Tourneo Connect
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Audi A3 Sportback offers significantly more power – delivering 400 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 250 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi A3 Sportback is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 3.8 s, while the Ford Tourneo Connect takes 10.1 s. That’s about 6.3 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi A3 Sportback delivers markedly more torque with 500 Nm compared to 350 Nm. That’s about 150 Nm more.
A3 Sportback
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Audi A3 Sportback is a bit lighter – 1,360 kg compared to 1,542 kg. The difference is around 182 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Ford Tourneo Connect offers substantially more boot space – 1,720 L compared to 380 L. That’s a difference of about 1,340 L.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Tourneo Connect carries significantly more – 818 kg compared to 480 kg. That’s a difference of about 338 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Audi A3 Sportback comes out modestly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £27,000
Audi A3 Sportback
Audi A3 Sportback
Ford Tourneo Connect
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Audi A3 Sportback
The Audi A3 Sportback wraps premium materials and crisp German design into a practical hatchback package that makes daily driving feel smart rather than showy. It’s nimble in the city, composed on longer trips, and carries just enough swagger to satisfy buyers who want quality without shouting about it.
details
Ford Tourneo Connect
The Ford Tourneo Connect is a practical, surprisingly polished people-mover that balances family-friendly flexibility with car-like driving manners. With clever storage, sliding doors and a bright, airy cabin it’s a smart choice for buyers who want sensible versatility without sacrificing everyday comfort — and it’s oddly enjoyable to drive for its size.
details
Audi A3 Sportback
Ford Tourneo Connect
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
27,000 - 92,900 £
|
Price
27,300 - 41,900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
1.1 - 9.3 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
0.5 - 6.9 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
134 - 141 km
|
Electric Range
116 - 119 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
25 - 211 g/km
|
co2
11 - 164 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
High Roof Estate
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,360 - 1,685 kg
|
Curb weight
1,542 - 1,781 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
280 - 380 L
|
Trunk capacity
1,213 - 1,720 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,816 - 1,851 mm
|
Width
1,855 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
410 - 480 kg
|
Payload
563 - 818 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Petrol, Diesel
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Manual Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
116 - 400 HP
|
Power HP
102 - 150 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 10.1 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.1 - 13.5 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
220 - 500 Nm
|
Torque
220 - 350 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 5
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
85 - 294 kW
|
Power kW
75 - 110 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 2,480 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,968 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, F, E, G, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E, F
|
|
Brand
Audi
|
Brand
Ford
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.