Compare performance (400 HP vs 218 HP), boot space and price (27,000 £ vs 50,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi A3 Sportback or Ford Transit Custom Bus?
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Audi A3 Sportback is clearly cheaper – starting at 27,000 £ , while the Ford Transit Custom Bus costs 50,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 23,796 £.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Audi A3 Sportback offers substantially more power – delivering 400 HP compared to 218 HP. That’s roughly 182 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Transit Custom Bus delivers visibly more torque with 630 Nm compared to 500 Nm. That’s about 130 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Ford Transit Custom Bus offers more seats – 9 vs 5.
The Audi A3 Sportback is barely ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Audi A3 Sportback wraps premium materials and crisp German design into a practical hatchback package that makes daily driving feel smart rather than showy. It’s nimble in the city, composed on longer trips, and carries just enough swagger to satisfy buyers who want quality without shouting about it.
detailsThe Ford Transit Custom Bus is a workhorse with a surprisingly comfy streak, offering a roomy, practical cabin that keeps passengers happy on long runs. It steers with more finesse than you’d expect from a people-mover and, whether you’re running a shuttle or converting it for weekend adventures, it’s a dependable, no-nonsense choice that makes life easier for drivers and operators alike.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
27,000 - 92,900 £
|
Price
50,800 - 63,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
1.1 - 9.3 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
22.3 - 26.4 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
134 - 141 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
25 - 211 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
Bus
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
9
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,345 - 1,685 kg
|
Curb weight
-
|
|
Trunk capacity
280 - 380 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,816 - 1,851 mm
|
Width
2,032 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
410 - 485 kg
|
Payload
-
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
116 - 400 HP
|
Power HP
136 - 218 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 10.1 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
220 - 500 Nm
|
Torque
415 - 630 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 5
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
85 - 294 kW
|
Power kW
100 - 160 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 2,480 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, F, E, G, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Audi
|
Brand
Ford
|