VS

Audi A5 Sportback vs Nissan Interstar comparison

Compare performance (639 HP vs 170 HP), boot space and price (40,200 £ vs 36,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi A5 Sportback or Nissan Interstar?

Audi A5 Sportback vs Nissan Interstar: Key differences

Audi A5 Sportback

  • significantly more power
  • considerably more efficient
  • somewhat lighter
details

Nissan Interstar

  • a bit cheaper
  • substantially more electric range
details

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

A5 Sportback

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Nissan Interstar is a bit cheaper – starting at 36,200 £ , while the Audi A5 Sportback costs 40,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4,041 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Audi A5 Sportback uses 2 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Nissan Interstar with 7.5 L/100km. The difference is about 5.5 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Nissan Interstar offers substantially more range – reaching up to 410 km, about 300 km more than the Audi A5 Sportback.

Interstar

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Audi A5 Sportback offers significantly more power – delivering 639 HP compared to 170 HP. That’s roughly 469 HP more horsepower.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi A5 Sportback delivers substantially more torque with 825 Nm compared to 380 Nm. That’s about 445 Nm more.

A5 Sportback

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: Audi A5 Sportback offers more seats – 5 vs 3.

In terms of curb weight, Audi A5 Sportback is somewhat lighter – 1,770 kg compared to 2,053 kg. The difference is around 283 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Nissan Interstar carries clearly more – 1,447 kg compared to 530 kg. That’s a difference of about 917 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Audi A5 Sportback is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £40,200
A5 Sportback

Audi A5 Sportback

  • Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid, Petrol, Diesel MHEV, Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 150 - 639 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 2 - 7.6 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 84 - 110 km
Audi A5 Sportback
Nissan Interstar

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Audi A5 Sportback

The Audi A5 Sportback dresses up sleek coupe proportions with the everyday sense of a practical hatchback, so you get striking looks without the compromises. Behind the wheel it balances poise and comfort with premium trimmings that make daily driving feel a little bit special — ideal for buyers who want style and substance in equal measure.

details

Nissan Interstar

The Nissan Interstar is a sensible, no-nonsense panel van that puts practicality front and center, with a cavernous load area and a durable feel built for daily work. It drives with surprising composure for its size, keeps running costs modest, and feels like the kind of professional tool that prefers reliable service over flashy showboating.

details
Audi A5 Sportback
Nissan Interstar

Costs and Consumption

Price
40,200 - 91,000 £
Price
36,200 - 54,800 £
Consumption L/100km
2 - 7.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
7.5 - 7.8 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
84 - 110 km
Electric Range
410 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
45 - 172 g/km
co2
0 - 205 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
Cargo Van
Seats
5
Seats
3
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,770 - 2,430 kg
Curb weight
2,053 - 2,455 kg
Trunk capacity
331 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,860 - 1,952 mm
Width
2,080 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
475 - 530 kg
Payload
1,045 - 1,447 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Petrol, Diesel MHEV, Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
150 - 639 HP
Power HP
130 - 170 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.7 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
280 - 825 Nm
Torque
300 - 380 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
110 - 470 kW
Power kW
96 - 125 kW
Engine capacity
1,968 - 2,995 cm3
Engine capacity
1,997 cm3

General

Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E, F, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, A
Brand
Audi
Brand
Nissan
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.