Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Audi A6 e-tron Avant vs Mitsubishi Space Star comparison
Compare performance (551 HP vs 71 HP), boot space and price (55,200 £ vs 11,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi A6 e-tron Avant or Mitsubishi Space Star?
Audi A6 e-tron Avant vs Mitsubishi Space Star: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
A6 e-tron Avant
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Mitsubishi Space Star is significantly cheaper – starting at 11,600 £ , while the Audi A6 e-tron Avant costs 55,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 43,594 £.
Space Star
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Audi A6 e-tron Avant offers substantially more power – delivering 551 HP compared to 71 HP. That’s roughly 480 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi A6 e-tron Avant is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.9 s, while the Mitsubishi Space Star takes 14.1 s. That’s about 10.2 s quicker.
Looking at top speed, the Audi A6 e-tron Avant is markedly faster – reaching 240 km/h, while the Mitsubishi Space Star tops out at 167 km/h. The difference is around 73 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi A6 e-tron Avant delivers considerably more torque with 855 Nm compared to 102 Nm. That’s about 753 Nm more.
A6 e-tron Avant
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Mitsubishi Space Star is considerably lighter – 940 kg compared to 2,185 kg. The difference is around 1,245 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Audi A6 e-tron Avant offers substantially more boot space – 502 L compared to 235 L. That’s a difference of about 267 L.
For maximum load capacity, the Audi A6 e-tron Avant offers visibly more capacity – up to 1,422 L, about 510 L more than the Mitsubishi Space Star.
When it comes to payload, the Audi A6 e-tron Avant carries somewhat more – 500 kg compared to 400 kg. That’s a difference of about 100 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Audi A6 e-tron Avant is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £55,200
Audi A6 e-tron Avant
Audi A6 e-tron Avant
Mitsubishi Space Star
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Audi A6 e-tron Avant
The Audi A6 e-tron Avant wraps Audi's trademark refinement into a sleek electric estate that looks at home in the city or on the open road. Inside it's grown-up and tech-forward with practical packaging for family life, delivering a composed, confident drive that makes everyday hauling feel a bit more special and slightly futuristic.
details
Mitsubishi Space Star
The Mitsubishi Space Star is a tidy, no-nonsense city car that squeezes surprising interior space into a compact, easy-to-park package. It's not a thrill-seeker's toy, but for buyers after low running costs, fuss-free reliability and sensible day-to-day practicality, it's a clever and cheerful choice that keeps your wallet and nerves happy.
details
Audi A6 e-tron Avant
Mitsubishi Space Star
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
55,200 - 100,100 £
|
Price
11,600 - 18,700 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.5 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 17 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
539 - 716 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
75.8 - 94.9 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
112 - 125 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
35 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Estate
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
2,185 - 2,410 kg
|
Curb weight
940 - 1,011 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
502 L
|
Trunk capacity
209 - 235 L
|
|
Length
4,928 mm
|
Length
3,845 mm
|
|
Width
1,923 mm
|
Width
1,665 mm
|
|
Height
1,504 - 1,527 mm
|
Height
1,505 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,422 L
|
Max trunk capacity
881 - 912 L
|
|
Payload
470 - 500 kg
|
Payload
359 - 400 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
326 - 551 HP
|
Power HP
71 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.9 - 6 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
14.1 - 15.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
210 - 240 km/h
|
Max Speed
163 - 167 km/h
|
|
Torque
435 - 855 Nm
|
Torque
102 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
240 - 405 kW
|
Power kW
52 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
1,193 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2,020 - 2,022
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D
|
|
Brand
Audi
|
Brand
Mitsubishi
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.