Compare performance (143 HP vs 71 HP), boot space and price (18,200 £ vs 11,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mitsubishi Colt or Mitsubishi Space Star?
The automotive market is always buzzing with fresh contenders, and Mitsubishi’s offerings, the Colt and the Space Star, are no exception. Both these hatchbacks cater to different segments, showcasing unique features, technical specifications, and innovations. In this comparison, we will delve into the key aspects of both vehicles to help you decide which one suits your needs better.
When it comes to design, both the Mitsubishi Colt and the Space Star exhibit sleek hatchback aesthetics, but they differ in size. The Colt measures 4053 mm in length, 1798 mm in width, and stands at 1439 mm tall. In contrast, the Space Star is more compact with a length of 3845 mm, a width of 1665 mm, and a height of 1505 mm. The larger dimensions of the Colt promise a roomier interior, while the Space Star's smaller form makes it a more agile option for city driving.
The Mitsubishi Colt offers a diverse lineup of engines. Customers can choose between petrol and full hybrid options, featuring a dual offering of power outputs ranging from 67 HP to an impressive 143 HP. The Space Star, on the other hand, boasts a singular yet capable 71 HP petrol engine. In terms of acceleration, the Colt performs admirably, with the sportier variant reaching 100 km/h in just 9.3 seconds, compared to the Space Star, which takes a more leisurely 14.1 seconds.
Consumers today are increasingly concerned about fuel efficiency and environmental impact. The Colt showcases better fuel consumption rates, with figures as low as 4.2 L/100km in its hybrid variant, while the Space Star manages a commendable 4.9 L/100km. In terms of CO2 emissions, the Colt again offers an edge; its lowest emission is rated at just 96 g/km compared to the Space Star's best at 112 g/km.
The Mitsubishi Colt provides buyers with multiple transmission options, including a manual gearbox and an automatic gearbox. More advanced versions even offer a full hybrid variant for those looking for enhanced efficiency. The Space Star limitedly offers a manual gearbox and a CVT, focusing more on delivering a smooth driving experience rather than performance strength.
Inside the cabin, both the Colt and Space Star offer seating for five, ensuring that family trips or commuter carpooling don’t sacrifice space. The Colt provides up to 391 liters of trunk capacity, unlike the Space Star’s more modest 235 liters, allowing for more luggage when needed. If you require flexible cargo space, the Colt will be the more accommodating option.
Safety features and onboard technology play a vital role in the modern automotive landscape. Both models come equipped with essential safety features, but they differ in the level of technology integration. Recent models of the Colt include advanced driver assistance systems, contributing to its reputation for safety. The Space Star, while safe, may not boast the same level of technological sophistication.
Ultimately, choosing between the Mitsubishi Colt and Space Star comes down to individual needs and preferences. The Colt presents a powerful, spacious, and technologically advanced option for those who prioritize performance and versatility. Conversely, the Space Star offers a practical, compact, and efficient choice, perfect for urban dwellers. Depending on your lifestyle and requirements, either choice from Mitsubishi could lead to a satisfying driving experience.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Mitsubishi Space Star is significantly cheaper – starting at 11,600 £ , while the Mitsubishi Colt costs 18,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6,514 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mitsubishi Colt uses 4.2 L/100km and is slightly more efficient than the Mitsubishi Space Star with 4.9 L/100km. The difference is about 0.7 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Mitsubishi Colt offers clearly more power – delivering 143 HP compared to 71 HP. That’s roughly 72 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mitsubishi Colt is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 9.3 s, while the Mitsubishi Space Star takes 14.1 s. That’s about 4.8 s quicker.
Looking at top speed, the Mitsubishi Colt is marginally faster – reaching 174 km/h, while the Mitsubishi Space Star tops out at 167 km/h. The difference is around 7 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Mitsubishi Colt delivers markedly more torque with 160 Nm compared to 102 Nm. That’s about 58 Nm more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Mitsubishi Space Star is noticeably lighter – 940 kg compared to 1,189 kg. The difference is around 249 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Mitsubishi Colt offers clearly more boot space – 391 L compared to 235 L. That’s a difference of about 156 L.
For maximum load capacity, the Mitsubishi Colt offers slightly more capacity – up to 1,069 L, about 157 L more than the Mitsubishi Space Star.
When it comes to payload, the Mitsubishi Space Star carries barely more – 400 kg compared to 385 kg. That’s a difference of about 15 kg.
The Mitsubishi Colt stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Mitsubishi Colt is a compact city hatch that blends sensible practicality with cheeky, no-nonsense styling, making it a confident companion for tight streets and daily errands. It may not be a playground for driving purists, but its easy-to-live-with manners, modest running costs and surprisingly roomy cabin make it a smart, sensible pick for urban buyers who value reliability over showmanship.
details
The Mitsubishi Space Star is a tidy, no-nonsense city car that squeezes surprising interior space into a compact, easy-to-park package. It's not a thrill-seeker's toy, but for buyers after low running costs, fuss-free reliability and sensible day-to-day practicality, it's a clever and cheerful choice that keeps your wallet and nerves happy.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
18,200 - 25,000 £
|
Price
11,600 - 18,700 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.2 - 5.3 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.5 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
96 - 119 g/km
|
co2
112 - 125 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
39 - 42 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
35 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,189 - 1,380 kg
|
Curb weight
940 - 1,011 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
301 - 391 L
|
Trunk capacity
209 - 235 L
|
|
Length
4,053 mm
|
Length
3,845 mm
|
|
Width
1,798 mm
|
Width
1,665 mm
|
|
Height
1,439 mm
|
Height
1,505 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
979 - 1,069 L
|
Max trunk capacity
881 - 912 L
|
|
Payload
381 - 385 kg
|
Payload
359 - 400 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
91 - 143 HP
|
Power HP
71 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.3 - 12.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
14.1 - 15.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
174 km/h
|
Max Speed
163 - 167 km/h
|
|
Torque
148 - 160 Nm
|
Torque
102 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
67 - 105 kW
|
Power kW
52 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1,598 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,193 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,023 - 2,025
|
Model Year
2,020 - 2,022
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D
|
|
Brand
Mitsubishi
|
Brand
Mitsubishi
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España