VS

Fiat Panda vs Mitsubishi Space Star – Differences & prices compared

Two cars, one duel: Fiat Panda meets Mitsubishi Space Star.
Which one wins in performance, efficiency and value for money? Find out now!

Panda @ media.stellantis.com

Panda vs. Space Star: Clash of Compact Titans

Urban driving enthusiasts, rejoice! Today, we dive into a detailed comparison between two popular and efficient hatchbacks gracing the narrow streets and challenging parking spots of modern cities. Both the Fiat Panda and Mitsubishi Space Star have made names for themselves in the segment of compact hatchbacks. But what really sets these cars apart, and how do they stack up against each other? Let’s find out.

Space Star @ presse.mitsubishi-motors.de

The Heart of the Beast: Engine and Performance

The Fiat Panda is powered by a 999 cm3 petrol Mild Hybrid Electric Vehicle (MHEV) engine, delivering a modest yet competent 70 horsepower (HP) and 92 Nm of torque. With a manual gearbox, this front-wheel-drive machine accelerates from 0 to 100 km/h in approximately 13.9 to 14.7 seconds, and can reach speeds up to 164 km/h.

In contrast, the Mitsubishi Space Star comes with a slightly larger 1193 cm3 petrol engine, producing 71 HP and 102 Nm of torque. It offers both manual and automatic CVT transmission options, with a 0-100 km/h acceleration time ranging from 14.1 to 15.8 seconds and a maximum speed of up to 167 km/h. This slight edge in power can make a significant difference in performance, especially for those who prefer automatic transmissions for a smoother drive experience.

Panda @ media.stellantis.com

Fuel Efficiency: Saving on the Go

When it comes to fuel efficiency, both cars offer economically conscious solutions. The Fiat Panda consumes between 5 and 5.1 liters per 100 kilometers, with CO2 emissions ranging between 113 and 116 g/km. It also boasts a larger fuel tank capacity of 38 liters, potentially allowing for fewer stops at the gas station.

The Mitsubishi Space Star, with its fuel consumption varying from 4.9 to 5.5 liters per 100 kilometers, presents itself as a strong contender in terms of economy. Its CO2 emissions fall within the range of 112 and 125 g/km, slightly beating the Panda in greener emissions. Although its fuel tank is two liters smaller at 35 liters, its superior efficiency could offset the need for frequent refueling.

Space Star @ presse.mitsubishi-motors.de

Space and Comfort: Interior and Cargo

Inside, both hatchbacks cater to small families or city adventurers with seating capacities ranging from four to five passengers. The Fiat Panda offers a trunk capacity of 225 liters, modest for light urban transportation but potentially limiting for larger cargo needs.

The Mitsubishi Space Star, slightly more accommodating, provides up to 235 liters of trunk space, granting a bit more room for those grocery runs or weekend getaways. Both models feature a practical five-door layout, ensuring easy access for passengers and parcels alike.

Panda @ media.stellantis.com

Dimensions and Maneuverability

The Panda stretches between 3653 and 3705 mm in length, with a width and height of up to 1662 mm and 1657 mm, respectively. These dimensions afford it a compact nature, perfect for city navigation and tight parking situations.

Meanwhile, the Space Star is slightly larger at 3845 mm in length, 1665 mm in width, and a more petite height of 1505 mm. While it offers a broader frame, it maintains agile handling in urban settings, courtesy of its smart design and engineering.

Space Star @ presse.mitsubishi-motors.de

The Verdict: Which Is Right for You?

Choosing between the Fiat Panda and Mitsubishi Space Star will largely depend on your preferences and needs. The Panda shines with its hybrid technology, strong efficiency, and classic Italian appeal. On the other hand, the Space Star impresses with its slightly better power output, versatility in transmission options, and a touch more cargo room.

Budget-conscious city dwellers and young families will find much to love in both models, but ultimately, the decision rests on your priorities: tech-savvy efficiency versus practical power and space. Either way, both hatchbacks are set to handle the urban jungle with ease and distinction.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Panda @ media.stellantis.com

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Mitsubishi Space Star has a clearly perceptible advantage in terms of price – it starts at 11600 £, while the Fiat Panda costs 14100 £. That’s a price difference of around 2486 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Mitsubishi Space Star manages with 4.90 L and is therefore minimal more efficient than the Fiat Panda with 5 L. The difference is about 0.10 L per 100 km.

Space Star @ presse.mitsubishi-motors.de

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Mitsubishi Space Star has a barely noticeable edge – offering 71 HP compared to 70 HP. That’s roughly 1 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Fiat Panda is slight quicker – completing the sprint in 13.90 s, while the Mitsubishi Space Star takes 14.10 s. That’s about 0.20 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Mitsubishi Space Star performs minimal better – reaching 167 km/h, while the Fiat Panda tops out at 164 km/h. The difference is around 3 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Mitsubishi Space Star pulls slight stronger with 102 Nm compared to 92 Nm. That’s about 10 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: Mitsubishi Space Star offers to a small extent more seating capacity – 5 vs 4.

In curb weight, Mitsubishi Space Star is a bit lighter – 940 kg compared to 1055 kg. The difference is around 115 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Mitsubishi Space Star offers slight more room – 235 L compared to 225 L. That’s a difference of about 10 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Mitsubishi Space Star performs barely noticeable better – up to 912 L, which is about 42 L more than the Fiat Panda.

When it comes to payload, Mitsubishi Space Star hardly perceptible takes the win – 400 kg compared to 365 kg. That’s a difference of about 35 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Mitsubishi Space Star shows itself to be dominates this comparison and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £11,600
DSC_2683_low

Mitsubishi Space Star

  • Engine Type : Petrol
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 71 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.9 - 5.5 L

Fiat Panda

5 (1)
rate

The Fiat Panda is a compact city car that brilliantly combines practical design and efficient functionality. Its boxy shape provides ample interior space and visibility, making it a favourite among urban drivers. With its reputation for reliability and affordability, the Panda continues to be a top choice for those seeking a no-frills, dependable vehicle.

details

Mitsubishi Space Star

The Mitsubishi Space Star offers a compact yet surprisingly spacious experience, making it an ideal choice for urban dwellers who need agility and comfort. Its sleek design is complemented by a range of vibrant colour options, adding a touch of flair to everyday commutes. With a focus on efficiency and practicality, the Space Star combines a user-friendly interface with modern technology to ensure a smooth driving experience.

details
Fiat Panda
Mitsubishi Space Star
Panda
Space Star

Costs and Consumption

Price
14100 £
Price
11600 - 18700 £
Consumption L/100km
5 L
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.5 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
113 g/km
co2
112 - 125 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
38 L
Fuel tank capacity
35 L

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
4
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1055 kg
Curb weight
940 - 1011 kg
Trunk capacity
225 L
Trunk capacity
209 - 235 L
Length
3635 mm
Length
3845 mm
Width
1643 mm
Width
1665 mm
Height
1551 mm
Height
1505 mm
Max trunk capacity
870 L
Max trunk capacity
881 - 912 L
Payload
365 kg
Payload
359 - 400 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Manuel
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
70 HP
Power HP
71 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
13.90 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
14.1 - 15.8 s
Max Speed
164 km/h
Max Speed
163 - 167 km/h
Torque
92 Nm
Torque
102 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
3
Power kW
51 kW
Power kW
52 kW
Engine capacity
999 cm3
Engine capacity
1193 cm3

General

Model Year
2024
Model Year
2020 - 2022
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D
Brand
Fiat
Brand
Mitsubishi
Is the Fiat Panda offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.