VS

Fiat Panda vs Mitsubishi Space Star comparison

Compare performance (70 HP vs 71 HP), boot space and price (14,100 £ vs 11,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Fiat Panda or Mitsubishi Space Star?

Fiat Panda vs Mitsubishi Space Star: Key differences

Fiat Panda

4.5 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • very slightly quicker 0–100 km/h

Mitsubishi Space Star

  • visibly cheaper
  • very slightly more power
  • only slightly more efficient
  • a bit lighter
  • barely more trunk space
Panda

Panda vs. Space Star: Clash of Compact Titans

Urban driving enthusiasts, rejoice! Today, we dive into a detailed comparison between two popular and efficient hatchbacks gracing the narrow streets and challenging parking spots of modern cities. Both the Fiat Panda and Mitsubishi Space Star have made names for themselves in the segment of compact hatchbacks. But what really sets these cars apart, and how do they stack up against each other? Let’s find out.

Space Star

The Heart of the Beast: Engine and Performance

The Fiat Panda is powered by a 999 cm3 petrol Mild Hybrid Electric Vehicle (MHEV) engine, delivering a modest yet competent 70 horsepower (HP) and 92 Nm of torque. With a manual gearbox, this front-wheel-drive machine accelerates from 0 to 100 km/h in approximately 13.9 to 14.7 seconds, and can reach speeds up to 164 km/h.

In contrast, the Mitsubishi Space Star comes with a slightly larger 1193 cm3 petrol engine, producing 71 HP and 102 Nm of torque. It offers both manual and automatic CVT transmission options, with a 0-100 km/h acceleration time ranging from 14.1 to 15.8 seconds and a maximum speed of up to 167 km/h. This slight edge in power can make a significant difference in performance, especially for those who prefer automatic transmissions for a smoother drive experience.

Panda

Fuel Efficiency: Saving on the Go

When it comes to fuel efficiency, both cars offer economically conscious solutions. The Fiat Panda consumes between 5 and 5.1 liters per 100 kilometers, with CO2 emissions ranging between 113 and 116 g/km. It also boasts a larger fuel tank capacity of 38 liters, potentially allowing for fewer stops at the gas station.

The Mitsubishi Space Star, with its fuel consumption varying from 4.9 to 5.5 liters per 100 kilometers, presents itself as a strong contender in terms of economy. Its CO2 emissions fall within the range of 112 and 125 g/km, slightly beating the Panda in greener emissions. Although its fuel tank is two liters smaller at 35 liters, its superior efficiency could offset the need for frequent refueling.

Space Star

Space and Comfort: Interior and Cargo

Inside, both hatchbacks cater to small families or city adventurers with seating capacities ranging from four to five passengers. The Fiat Panda offers a trunk capacity of 225 liters, modest for light urban transportation but potentially limiting for larger cargo needs.

The Mitsubishi Space Star, slightly more accommodating, provides up to 235 liters of trunk space, granting a bit more room for those grocery runs or weekend getaways. Both models feature a practical five-door layout, ensuring easy access for passengers and parcels alike.

Panda

Dimensions and Maneuverability

The Panda stretches between 3653 and 3705 mm in length, with a width and height of up to 1662 mm and 1657 mm, respectively. These dimensions afford it a compact nature, perfect for city navigation and tight parking situations.

Meanwhile, the Space Star is slightly larger at 3845 mm in length, 1665 mm in width, and a more petite height of 1505 mm. While it offers a broader frame, it maintains agile handling in urban settings, courtesy of its smart design and engineering.

Space Star

The Verdict: Which Is Right for You?

Choosing between the Fiat Panda and Mitsubishi Space Star will largely depend on your preferences and needs. The Panda shines with its hybrid technology, strong efficiency, and classic Italian appeal. On the other hand, the Space Star impresses with its slightly better power output, versatility in transmission options, and a touch more cargo room.

Budget-conscious city dwellers and young families will find much to love in both models, but ultimately, the decision rests on your priorities: tech-savvy efficiency versus practical power and space. Either way, both hatchbacks are set to handle the urban jungle with ease and distinction.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Panda

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Mitsubishi Space Star is visibly cheaper – starting at 11,600 £ , while the Fiat Panda costs 14,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2,486 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mitsubishi Space Star uses 4.9 L/100km and is only slightly more efficient than the Fiat Panda with 5 L/100km. The difference is about 0.1 L/100km.

Space Star

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Mitsubishi Space Star offers very slightly more power – delivering 71 HP compared to 70 HP. That’s roughly 1 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Fiat Panda is very slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 13.9 s, while the Mitsubishi Space Star takes 14.1 s. That’s about 0.2 s quicker.

Looking at top speed, the Mitsubishi Space Star is marginally faster – reaching 167 km/h, while the Fiat Panda tops out at 164 km/h. The difference is around 3 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mitsubishi Space Star delivers barely more torque with 102 Nm compared to 92 Nm. That’s about 10 Nm more.

Panda

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Mitsubishi Space Star offers more seats – 5 vs 4.

In terms of curb weight, Mitsubishi Space Star is a bit lighter – 940 kg compared to 1,055 kg. The difference is around 115 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mitsubishi Space Star offers barely more boot space – 235 L compared to 225 L. That’s a difference of about 10 L.

For maximum load capacity, the Mitsubishi Space Star offers marginally more capacity – up to 912 L, about 42 L more than the Fiat Panda.

When it comes to payload, the Mitsubishi Space Star carries only slightly more – 400 kg compared to 365 kg. That’s a difference of about 35 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mitsubishi Space Star stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £11,600
Space Star

Mitsubishi Space Star

  • Engine Type : Petrol
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 71 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.9 - 5.5 L/100km
Fiat Panda
Mitsubishi Space Star

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Fiat Panda

The Panda is a charming, no-nonsense city companion that mixes cheerful Italian flair with genuinely useful practicality, making tight streets and daily errands feel less of a chore. Its honest simplicity, clever packaging and a dash of cheeky character make it a smart, low-stress buy for people who prefer sensible perks over showroom flash.

details

Mitsubishi Space Star

The Mitsubishi Space Star is a tidy, no-nonsense city car that squeezes surprising interior space into a compact, easy-to-park package. It's not a thrill-seeker's toy, but for buyers after low running costs, fuss-free reliability and sensible day-to-day practicality, it's a clever and cheerful choice that keeps your wallet and nerves happy.

details
Fiat Panda
Mitsubishi Space Star

Costs and Consumption

Price
14,100 £
Price
11,600 - 18,700 £
Consumption L/100km
5 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
113 g/km
co2
112 - 125 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
38 L
Fuel tank capacity
35 L

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
4
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,055 kg
Curb weight
940 - 1,011 kg
Trunk capacity
225 L
Trunk capacity
209 - 235 L
Length
3,635 mm
Length
3,845 mm
Width
1,643 mm
Width
1,665 mm
Height
1,551 mm
Height
1,505 mm
Max trunk capacity
870 L
Max trunk capacity
881 - 912 L
Payload
365 kg
Payload
359 - 400 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Manuel
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
70 HP
Power HP
71 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
13.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
14.1 - 15.8 s
Max Speed
164 km/h
Max Speed
163 - 167 km/h
Torque
92 Nm
Torque
102 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
3
Power kW
51 kW
Power kW
52 kW
Engine capacity
999 cm3
Engine capacity
1,193 cm3

General

Model Year
2,024
Model Year
2,020 - 2,022
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D
Brand
Fiat
Brand
Mitsubishi
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.