VS

Audi A6 e-tron Sportback vs Nissan Interstar comparison

Compare performance (551 HP vs 170 HP), boot space and price (53,800 £ vs 36,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi A6 e-tron Sportback or Nissan Interstar?

Audi A6 e-tron Sportback vs Nissan Interstar: Key differences

Audi A6 e-tron Sportback

4.6 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially more power
  • significantly more electric range
details

Nissan Interstar

  • substantially cheaper
  • only slightly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

A6 e-tron Sportback

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Nissan Interstar is substantially cheaper – starting at 36,200 £ , while the Audi A6 e-tron Sportback costs 53,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 17,669 £.

As for electric range, the Audi A6 e-tron Sportback offers significantly more range – reaching up to 754 km, about 344 km more than the Nissan Interstar.

Interstar

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Audi A6 e-tron Sportback offers substantially more power – delivering 551 HP compared to 170 HP. That’s roughly 381 HP more horsepower.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi A6 e-tron Sportback delivers clearly more torque with 855 Nm compared to 380 Nm. That’s about 475 Nm more.

A6 e-tron Sportback

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: Audi A6 e-tron Sportback offers more seats – 5 vs 3.

In terms of curb weight, Nissan Interstar is only slightly lighter – 2,053 kg compared to 2,175 kg. The difference is around 122 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Nissan Interstar carries clearly more – 1,447 kg compared to 500 kg. That’s a difference of about 947 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Audi A6 e-tron Sportback holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £53,800
A6 e-tron Sportback

Audi A6 e-tron Sportback

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 326 - 551 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 13.7 - 16.3 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 572 - 754 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Audi A6 e-tron Sportback
Audi Q6 e-tron
VS
In the automotive showdown between the Audi A6 e-tron Sportback and the Audi Q6 e-tron, enthusiasts are treated to a fascinating contrast of style and practicality. The A6 e-tron Sportback boasts a sleek, coupe-like silhouette that caters to drivers seeking elegance, while the Q6 e-tron offers a …
Nissan Interstar
Renault Master Transporter
VS
Choosing between the Nissan Interstar and the Renault Master comes down to balancing payload, practicality and running costs for light commercial use. This comparison will cover cargo capacity, engines, fuel economy, driving comfort and ownership costs so you can pick the van that best fits your …
Audi A6 e-tron Sportback
Nissan Interstar

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Audi A6 e-tron Sportback

The Audi A6 e-tron Sportback wraps futuristic electric technology in elegant, coupe-like proportions, so you arrive looking sharp without shouting for attention. Inside, refined materials and a calm, driver-focused layout make it a convincing choice for buyers who want quiet, effortless performance with a dash of everyday practicality — the kind of car that raises eyebrows without saying a word.

details
A244494_medium
A244492_medium
A243215_medium

Reviews Audi A6 e-tron Sportback

4.6 (2 Reviews)
rate
Mark
9 May 2026, 14:15:42

Audi much better quality than Tesla

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Michael
7 May 2026, 12:09:31

Wonderful car very confortable and smooth driving

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Nissan Interstar

The Nissan Interstar is a sensible, no-nonsense panel van that puts practicality front and center, with a cavernous load area and a durable feel built for daily work. It drives with surprising composure for its size, keeps running costs modest, and feels like the kind of professional tool that prefers reliable service over flashy showboating.

details
serpimg_9dGXeC

Reviews Nissan Interstar

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Audi A6 e-tron Sportback
Tesla Model Y
VS
In a head-to-head comparison, the Audi A6 e-tron Sportback stands out with its luxurious interior and advanced technology, appealing to those who value comfort and sophistication in their electric vehicle. Meanwhile, the Tesla Model Y offers impressive range and performance, cementing its …
Ford Transit Bus
Nissan Interstar
VS
Ford Transit Bus and Nissan Interstar go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Audi A6 Avant
Audi A6 e-tron Sportback
VS
In the automotive world, the Audi A6 Avant and the Audi A6 e-tron Sportback each offer a unique blend of luxury and performance. The A6 Avant stands out with its spacious interior and versatile cargo capacity, making it the ideal choice for those who prioritize practicality alongside elegance. In …
Fiat Ducato
Nissan Interstar
VS
Fiat Ducato and Nissan Interstar go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Audi Q4 e-tron
Audi A6 e-tron Sportback
VS
Audi Q4 e-tron and Audi A6 e-tron Sportback go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Audi A6 e-tron Avant
Audi A6 e-tron Sportback
VS
In the luxury electric segment, the Audi A6 e-tron Avant and Audi A6 e-tron Sportback offer distinct yet compelling choices. The Avant captivates with its versatile, spacious estate design, ideal for those seeking practicality without sacrificing elegance. On the other hand, the Sportback entices …
Audi A6 e-tron Sportback
Volvo ES90
VS
Audi A6 e-tron Sportback and Volvo ES90 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Audi A6 e-tron Sportback
BMW i5
VS
In the latest showdown of electric luxury sedans, the Audi A6 e-tron Sportback and BMW i5 each offer their distinct charms. The Audi A6 e-tron Sportback captivates with its sleek design and cutting-edge tech, prioritizing aesthetics alongside a futuristic driving experience. On the other hand, the …
Audi A6 e-tron Sportback
Nissan Interstar

Costs and Consumption
Price
53,800 - 98,700 £
Price
36,200 - 54,800 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
7.5 - 7.8 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
13.7 - 16.3 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
572 - 754 km
Electric Range
410 km
Battery Capacity
75.8 - 94.9 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 - 205 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
Cargo Van
Seats
5
Seats
3
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,175 - 2,400 kg
Curb weight
2,053 - 2,455 kg
Trunk capacity
502 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
4,928 mm
Length
-
Width
1,923 mm
Width
2,080 mm
Height
1,465 - 1,487 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
1,330 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
470 - 500 kg
Payload
1,045 - 1,447 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
326 - 551 HP
Power HP
130 - 170 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.9 - 6 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Max Speed
210 - 240 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
435 - 855 Nm
Torque
300 - 380 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
240 - 405 kW
Power kW
96 - 125 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1,997 cm3

General
Model Year
2024
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, A
Brand
Audi
Brand
Nissan
Is the Audi A6 e-tron Sportback offered with different drivetrains?

The Audi A6 e-tron Sportback is available as Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.