VS

Audi Q3 vs Ford Mustang Mach-E comparison

Compare performance (272 HP vs 487 HP), boot space and price (38,200 £ vs 48,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi Q3 or Ford Mustang Mach-E?

Audi Q3 vs Ford Mustang Mach-E: Key differences

Audi Q3

4.3 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • markedly lighter
details

Ford Mustang Mach-E

3.8 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably more power
  • clearly more electric range
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
  • barely more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Q3

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Audi Q3 is clearly cheaper – starting at 38,200 £ , while the Ford Mustang Mach-E costs 48,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 10,200 £.

As for electric range, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers clearly more range – reaching up to 600 km, about 481 km more than the Audi Q3.

Mustang Mach-E

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers considerably more power – delivering 487 HP compared to 272 HP. That’s roughly 215 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Mustang Mach-E is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 3.8 s, while the Audi Q3 takes 5.7 s. That’s about 1.9 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Mustang Mach-E delivers clearly more torque with 950 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 550 Nm more.

Q3

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Audi Q3 is markedly lighter – 1,635 kg compared to 2,161 kg. The difference is around 526 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers barely more boot space – 519 L compared to 488 L. That’s a difference of about 31 L.

When it comes to payload, the Audi Q3 carries moderately more – 535 kg compared to 450 kg. That’s a difference of about 85 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Mustang Mach-E is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £48,400
Mustang Mach-E

Ford Mustang Mach-E

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 268 - 487 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 17.7 - 21 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 470 - 600 km
Audi Q3
Ford Mustang Mach-E

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Audi Q3

The Audi Q3 is a compact premium crossover that blends sharp styling with a well-crafted interior, making it an appealing choice for urban drivers who want a touch of luxury. It delivers a composed ride, intuitive tech features and a practical cabin, so it works well as a comfortable daily driver with an upscale feel.

details

Ford Mustang Mach-E

The Mustang Mach-E proves an electric SUV can be both playful and practical, with the Mustang name bringing muscle-car charisma to a family-friendly package. It delivers eager performance, a comfortable cabin, and a slick infotainment setup that keeps daily driving fun — and yes, you’ll still get admiring glances at the lights.

details
Audi Q3
Ford Mustang Mach-E

Costs and Consumption

Price
38,200 - 54,200 £
Price
48,400 - 66,900 £
Consumption L/100km
1.7 - 8.8 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
17.7 - 21 kWh/100km
Electric Range
109 - 119 km
Electric Range
470 - 600 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
39 - 199 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,635 - 1,900 kg
Curb weight
2,161 - 2,351 kg
Trunk capacity
375 - 488 L
Trunk capacity
519 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,859 mm
Width
1,881 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
505 - 535 kg
Payload
368 - 450 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
150 - 272 HP
Power HP
268 - 487 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.7 - 9.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 6.2 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
Torque
525 - 950 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
110 - 200 kW
Power kW
197 - 358 kW
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, G, B, F
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Audi
Brand
Ford
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.