VS

Audi Q7 vs Mitsubishi Space Star comparison

Compare performance (507 HP vs 71 HP), boot space and price (70,600 £ vs 11,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi Q7 or Mitsubishi Space Star?

Audi Q7 vs Mitsubishi Space Star: Key differences

Audi Q7

4.5 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably more power
  • visibly more efficient
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • substantially more trunk space
details

Mitsubishi Space Star

4.3 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • significantly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Q7

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Mitsubishi Space Star is significantly cheaper – starting at 11,600 £ , while the Audi Q7 costs 70,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 58,980 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Audi Q7 uses 3.8 L/100km and is visibly more efficient than the Mitsubishi Space Star with 4.9 L/100km. The difference is about 1.1 L/100km.

Space Star

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Audi Q7 offers considerably more power – delivering 507 HP compared to 71 HP. That’s roughly 436 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi Q7 is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.1 s, while the Mitsubishi Space Star takes 14.1 s. That’s about 10 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi Q7 delivers significantly more torque with 770 Nm compared to 102 Nm. That’s about 668 Nm more.

Q7

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Audi Q7 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Mitsubishi Space Star is significantly lighter – 940 kg compared to 2,055 kg. The difference is around 1,115 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Audi Q7 offers substantially more boot space – 887 L compared to 235 L. That’s a difference of about 652 L.

When it comes to payload, the Audi Q7 carries substantially more – 885 kg compared to 400 kg. That’s a difference of about 485 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Audi Q7 is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £70,600
Q7

Audi Q7

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 231 - 507 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 3.8 - 11.9 L/100km
  • Electric Range 81 - 82 km
Audi Q7
Mitsubishi Space Star

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Audi Q7

The Audi Q7 cuts an imposing figure on the road, balancing restrained luxury with a spacious, tech-rich cabin that makes long journeys feel effortless. It rides with confident composure and polished manners, so if you want a premium family SUV that feels grown-up and worth the badge, the Q7 is a persuasive choice — even the in-laws will be impressed.

details

Mitsubishi Space Star

The Mitsubishi Space Star is a tidy, no-nonsense city car that squeezes surprising interior space into a compact, easy-to-park package. It's not a thrill-seeker's toy, but for buyers after low running costs, fuss-free reliability and sensible day-to-day practicality, it's a clever and cheerful choice that keeps your wallet and nerves happy.

details
Audi Q7
Mitsubishi Space Star

Costs and Consumption

Price
70,600 - 100,600 £
Price
11,600 - 18,700 £
Consumption L/100km
3.8 - 11.9 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
81 - 82 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
86 - 271 g/km
co2
112 - 125 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
35 L

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5 - 7
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
2,055 - 2,460 kg
Curb weight
940 - 1,011 kg
Trunk capacity
563 - 887 L
Trunk capacity
209 - 235 L
Length
-
Length
3,845 mm
Width
1,970 mm
Width
1,665 mm
Height
-
Height
1,505 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
881 - 912 L
Payload
640 - 885 kg
Payload
359 - 400 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
231 - 507 HP
Power HP
71 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.1 - 7.1 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
14.1 - 15.8 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
163 - 167 km/h
Torque
500 - 770 Nm
Torque
102 Nm
Number of Cylinders
6 - 8
Number of Cylinders
3
Power kW
170 - 373 kW
Power kW
52 kW
Engine capacity
2,967 - 3,996 cm3
Engine capacity
1,193 cm3

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2,020 - 2,022
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D
Brand
Audi
Brand
Mitsubishi
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.