Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Audi Q8 e-tron vs Renault Scénic comparison
Compare performance (503 HP vs 218 HP), boot space and price (65,100 £ vs 34,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi Q8 e-tron or Renault Scénic?
Audi Q8 e-tron vs Renault Scénic: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Q8 e-tron
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Renault Scénic is clearly cheaper – starting at 34,600 £ , while the Audi Q8 e-tron costs 65,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 30,429 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Renault Scénic is moderately more efficient: consuming 16.6 kWh/100km compared to 19.7 kWh/100km for the Audi Q8 e-tron. That’s a difference of about 3.1 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Renault Scénic offers very slightly more range – reaching up to 598 km, about 3 km more than the Audi Q8 e-tron.
Scénic
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Audi Q8 e-tron offers clearly more power – delivering 503 HP compared to 218 HP. That’s roughly 285 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi Q8 e-tron is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 4.5 s, while the Renault Scénic takes 7.9 s. That’s about 3.4 s quicker.
Looking at top speed, the Audi Q8 e-tron is slightly faster – reaching 210 km/h, while the Renault Scénic tops out at 170 km/h. The difference is around 40 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi Q8 e-tron delivers substantially more torque with 973 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 673 Nm more.
Q8 e-tron
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Renault Scénic is significantly lighter – 1,822 kg compared to 2,585 kg. The difference is around 763 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Audi Q8 e-tron offers only slightly more boot space – 569 L compared to 545 L. That’s a difference of about 24 L.
For maximum load capacity, the Renault Scénic offers marginally more capacity – up to 1,670 L, about 33 L more than the Audi Q8 e-tron.
When it comes to payload, the Audi Q8 e-tron carries moderately more – 595 kg compared to 518 kg. That’s a difference of about 77 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Audi Q8 e-tron stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £65,100
Audi Q8 e-tron
Audi Q8 e-tron
Renault Scénic
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Audi Q8 e-tron
The Audi Q8 e-tron wraps Audi’s usual premium polish into a quiet, composed electric SUV that feels refined and surprisingly effortless to drive. With a spacious, tech-forward cabin and understated road presence, it’s a practical yet stylish choice for buyers who want electric motoring without losing the dignity of a proper luxury SUV.
details
Renault Scénic
The Renault Scenic is a practical and comfortable family car that prioritises interior flexibility and everyday usability. With a composed ride and clever storage solutions, it suits buyers who want a versatile, easy-to-live-with vehicle for family duties and daily driving.
details
Audi Q8 e-tron
Renault Scénic
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
65,100 - 102,800 £
|
Price
34,600 - 44,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
19.7 - 26.3 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.6 - 17.5 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
456 - 595 km
|
Electric Range
420 - 598 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
89 - 106 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
2,585 - 2,725 kg
|
Curb weight
1,822 - 1,927 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
528 - 569 L
|
Trunk capacity
545 L
|
|
Length
4,915 mm
|
Length
4,470 mm
|
|
Width
1,937 - 1,994 mm
|
Width
1,864 mm
|
|
Height
1,617 - 1,683 mm
|
Height
1,571 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,567 - 1,637 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1,670 L
|
|
Payload
515 - 595 kg
|
Payload
514 - 518 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
340 - 503 HP
|
Power HP
170 - 218 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.5 - 6 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.9 - 8.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
200 - 210 km/h
|
Max Speed
150 - 170 km/h
|
|
Torque
664 - 973 Nm
|
Torque
280 - 300 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
250 - 370 kW
|
Power kW
125 - 160 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,023 - 2,024
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Audi
|
Brand
Renault
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.