Compare performance (326 HP vs 141 HP), boot space and price (38,200 £ vs 30,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – BMW X1 or Mazda CX-5?
In the competitive world of compact SUVs, the BMW X1 and Mazda CX-5 stand out as dynamic contenders. Both models offer robust performance, comfort, and cutting-edge technology, catering to a diverse clientele. This article delves into the technical aspects and innovations of these two vehicles to help potential buyers make an informed decision.
The BMW X1 offers a versatile range of engine options, including petrol, diesel, mild hybrid (MHEV), and plug-in hybrid variants. With power outputs ranging from 136 HP to an exhilarating 326 HP, the X1's engines deliver versatility in performance. The dual-clutch automatic transmission ensures seamless gear changes, providing a smooth and responsive driving experience.
On the other hand, the Mazda CX-5 is available with petrol and diesel engines equipped with MHEV technology. With horsepower spanning from 150 HP to 194 HP, the CX-5 provides a reliable and consistent ride. The option between manual and automatic gearboxes allows drivers to select their preferred driving style, while still maintaining impressive efficiency.
BMW’s commitment to sustainability is evident in the X1's impressive fuel consumption, particularly the plug-in hybrid which boasts as low as 0.8 L/100 km. Moreover, the plug-in hybrid X1 offers an electric range of 83 kilometers, making it an excellent choice for city commuting with reduced emissions.
The Mazda CX-5 demonstrates competitive fuel efficiency with an average consumption between 5.6 to 7.6 L/100 km. However, when it comes to CO2 emissions, the X1 emerges as the eco-friendlier option. BMW's advanced MHEV and plug-in technologies significantly reduce carbon footprints, whereas the CX-5 is positioned slightly higher on the emission scale.
Both the BMW X1 and Mazda CX-5 are designed to ensure passenger comfort. The X1 accommodates five passengers, providing a roomy environment with a trunk capacity of up to 540 liters. The dimensions of 4505 mm in length and 1845 mm in width offer a balance between an agile city ride and ample interior space.
The Mazda CX-5 extends slightly longer with a length of 4575 mm but maintains the same width, allowing for a spacious cabin and a trunk capacity of 522 liters. Its elevated height of 1680 mm gives a more commanding road presence and additional headroom.
BMW's hallmark driving pleasure is evident in the X1's dynamic handling and all-wheel drive capability, offering superior road grip and stability. The X1’s top speed of 250 km/h and acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h in as little as 5.4 seconds in its top variant offer thrilling performance.
Meanwhile, the Mazda CX-5 retains its reputation for efficiency over speed, with a top speed of 208 km/h and acceleration times starting from 9.2 seconds. Its advanced safety features and driving aids ensure a safe journey, rendering the CX-5 a reliable family vehicle.
Deciding between the BMW X1 and Mazda CX-5 ultimately depends on personal preferences. The BMW X1 is suitable for those prioritizing performance, luxury, and cutting-edge hybrid technology, though it may come with a higher price tag. In contrast, the Mazda CX-5 is a more budget-friendly choice, offering dependable performance and practicality without compromising on essential comfort and safety features.
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Mazda CX-5 is visibly cheaper – starting at 30,000 £ , while the BMW X1 costs 38,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 8,237 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the BMW X1 uses 2.5 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Mazda CX-5 with 7 L/100km. The difference is about 4.5 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the BMW X1 offers considerably more power – delivering 326 HP compared to 141 HP. That’s roughly 185 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the BMW X1 is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 5.4 s, while the Mazda CX-5 takes 10.5 s. That’s about 5.1 s quicker.
Looking at top speed, the BMW X1 is moderately faster – reaching 233 km/h, while the Mazda CX-5 tops out at 195 km/h. The difference is around 38 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the BMW X1 delivers considerably more torque with 477 Nm compared to 238 Nm. That’s about 239 Nm more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, BMW X1 is marginally lighter – 1,575 kg compared to 1,629 kg. The difference is around 54 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Mazda CX-5 offers very slightly more boot space – 583 L compared to 540 L. That’s a difference of about 43 L.
For maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-5 offers clearly more capacity – up to 2,019 L, about 474 L more than the BMW X1.
When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-5 carries moderately more – 601 kg compared to 500 kg. That’s a difference of about 101 kg.
The BMW X1 stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The BMW X1 brings a premium feel to compact crossover life, wrapping practical space and agile handling into a tidy, upscale package. It’s ideal for buyers who want BMW driving dynamics without the bulk, offering everyday comfort and a few clever tricks to keep the commute interesting.
details
The Mazda CX-5 blends elegant, athletic styling with a surprisingly engaging driving character, turning routine trips into small, satisfying adventures. Inside it feels thoughtfully built and comfortable, offering sensible practicality and a premium feel that punches above its price.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
38,200 - 55,500 £
|
Price
30,000 - 39,500 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
2.5 - 7.7 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
7 - 7.4 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
81 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
14.2 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
57 - 175 g/km
|
co2
157 - 168 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
47 - 54 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
56 - 58 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,575 - 1,935 kg
|
Curb weight
1,629 - 1,671 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
490 - 540 L
|
Trunk capacity
466 - 583 L
|
|
Length
4,500 mm
|
Length
4,690 mm
|
|
Width
1,845 mm
|
Width
1,860 mm
|
|
Height
1,630 - 1,642 mm
|
Height
1,695 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,495 - 1,545 L
|
Max trunk capacity
2,019 L
|
|
Payload
490 - 500 kg
|
Payload
601 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel MHEV, Petrol MHEV, Petrol, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
136 - 326 HP
|
Power HP
141 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 9.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.5 - 10.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
190 - 233 km/h
|
Max Speed
195 km/h
|
|
Torque
230 - 477 Nm
|
Torque
238 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
100 - 240 kW
|
Power kW
104 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,499 - 1,998 cm3
|
Engine capacity
2,488 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
Model Year
2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, F, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F
|
|
Brand
BMW
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España