Compare performance (530 HP vs 170 HP), boot space and price (91,300 £ vs 36,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – BMW X7 or Nissan Interstar?
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Nissan Interstar is substantially cheaper – starting at 36,200 £ , while the BMW X7 costs 91,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 55,126 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Nissan Interstar uses 7.5 L/100km and is very slightly more efficient than the BMW X7 with 8 L/100km. The difference is about 0.5 L/100km.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the BMW X7 offers clearly more power – delivering 530 HP compared to 170 HP. That’s roughly 360 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the BMW X7 delivers significantly more torque with 750 Nm compared to 380 Nm. That’s about 370 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: BMW X7 offers more seats – 7 vs 3.
In terms of curb weight, Nissan Interstar is visibly lighter – 2,053 kg compared to 2,490 kg. The difference is around 437 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Nissan Interstar carries significantly more – 1,447 kg compared to 760 kg. That’s a difference of about 687 kg.
The BMW X7 holds a slight edge in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The BMW X7 sits at the top of BMW’s SUV range, wrapping executive-level luxury and a cavernous cabin in a bold, road-commanding package. It’s ideal for buyers who want first-class comfort and presence on the road — think chauffeur-level refinement without hiring one, though you’ll need a confident approach to parking.
detailsThe Nissan Interstar is a sensible, no-nonsense panel van that puts practicality front and center, with a cavernous load area and a durable feel built for daily work. It drives with surprising composure for its size, keeps running costs modest, and feels like the kind of professional tool that prefers reliable service over flashy showboating.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
91,300 - 118,300 £
|
Price
36,200 - 54,800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
8 - 12.1 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
7.5 - 7.8 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
410 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
210 - 274 g/km
|
co2
0 - 205 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
|
Seats
7
|
Seats
3
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,490 - 2,675 kg
|
Curb weight
2,053 - 2,455 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
750 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
2,000 mm
|
Width
2,080 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
680 - 760 kg
|
Payload
1,045 - 1,447 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
352 - 530 HP
|
Power HP
130 - 170 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.7 - 5.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
520 - 750 Nm
|
Torque
300 - 380 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
6 - 8
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
259 - 390 kW
|
Power kW
96 - 125 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
2,993 - 4,395 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,997 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, A
|
|
Brand
BMW
|
Brand
Nissan
|