Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
BMW XM vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (748 HP vs 635 HP), boot space and price (114700 £ vs 78600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – BMW XM or Land Rover Range Rover Sport?
XM
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has a decisively advantage in terms of price – it starts at 78600 £ , while the BMW XM costs 114700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 36085 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Land Rover Range Rover Sport manages with 2.70 L and is therefore convincingly more efficient than the BMW XM with 4.70 L. The difference is about 2 L per 100 km.
As for electric range, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport performs distinct better – achieving up to 118 km, about 38 km more than the BMW XM.
Range Rover Sport
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the BMW XM has a slightly edge – offering 748 HP compared to 635 HP. That’s roughly 113 HP more horsepower.
Both models accelerate almost equally fast – 3.80 s from 0 to 100 km/h.
In terms of top speed, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport performs to a small extent better – reaching 290 km/h, while the BMW XM tops out at 250 km/h. The difference is around 40 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: BMW XM pulls slightly stronger with 1000 Nm compared to 800 Nm. That’s about 200 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
XM
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: BMW XM offers distinct more seating capacity – 7 vs 5.
In curb weight, Land Rover Range Rover Sport is a bit lighter – 2390 kg compared to 2695 kg. The difference is around 305 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport offers a bit more room – 647 L compared to 527 L. That’s a difference of about 120 L.
In maximum load capacity, the BMW XM performs slightly better – up to 1820 L, which is about 329 L more than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport.
When it comes to payload, Land Rover Range Rover Sport evident takes the win – 830 kg compared to 525 kg. That’s a difference of about 305 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Land Rover Range Rover Sport is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
BMW XM
Land Rover Range Rover Sport
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £78,600
Land Rover Range Rover Sport
BMW XM
The BMW XM is an unapologetically bold flagship that fuses brash, hyper-styled presence with the kind of luxury that commands attention wherever it goes. Inside it's a leather-clad showpiece loaded with modern tech and a driving personality that blends theatrical muscle with refined grand-tourer composure—ideal for buyers who want drama and comfort in equal measure.
details
Land Rover Range Rover Sport
The Range Rover Sport pairs unapologetic presence with genuine capability, looking like it belongs on a red carpet while quietly promising to tackle rough tracks when called upon. Inside, the cabin pampers with plush materials and thoughtful tech, making it an irresistible choice for buyers who want luxury, confidence and a touch of adventure.
details
BMW XM
Land Rover Range Rover Sport
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
114700 - 157200 £
|
Price
78600 - 175700 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.7 - 6.1 L
|
Consumption L/100km
2.7 - 11.7 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
77 - 80 km
|
Electric Range
116 - 118 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
25.70 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
105 - 138 g/km
|
co2
61 - 266 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
69 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
90 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
7
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
2695 - 2795 kg
|
Curb weight
2390 - 2810 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
527 L
|
Trunk capacity
647 L
|
|
Length
5110 mm
|
Length
4970 mm
|
|
Width
2005 mm
|
Width
2043 mm
|
|
Height
1755 mm
|
Height
1814 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1820 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1491 L
|
|
Payload
505 - 525 kg
|
Payload
640 - 830 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
476 - 748 HP
|
Power HP
249 - 635 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 5.1 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 7.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
250 km/h
|
Max Speed
290 km/h
|
|
Torque
700 - 1000 Nm
|
Torque
570 - 800 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
6 - 8
|
Number of Cylinders
6 - 8
|
|
Power kW
350 - 550 kW
|
Power kW
183 - 467 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
2998 - 4395 cm3
|
Engine capacity
2997 - 4395 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, G
|
|
Brand
BMW
|
Brand
Land Rover
|
What drive types are available for the BMW XM?
The BMW XM is available as All-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.