Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
BMW XM vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport – Which car suits you better?
Both models have their strengths – but which one suits you more?
Compare performance, efficiency, price and space directly: BMW XM or Land Rover Range Rover Sport?
XM
@ BMW Group Press
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has a decisively advantage in terms of price – it starts at 78600 £, while the BMW XM costs 114700 £. That’s a price difference of around 36085 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Land Rover Range Rover Sport manages with 2.70 L and is therefore convincingly more efficient than the BMW XM with 4.70 L. The difference is about 2 L per 100 km.
As for range, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport performs distinct better – achieving up to 118 km, about 38 km more than the BMW XM.
Range Rover Sport
@ Jaguar Land Rover Media
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the BMW XM has a slightly edge – offering 748 HP compared to 635 HP. That’s roughly 113 HP more horsepower.
Both models accelerate almost equally fast – 3.80 s from 0 to 100 km/h.
In terms of top speed, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport performs to a small extent better – reaching 290 km/h, while the BMW XM tops out at 250 km/h. The difference is around 40 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: BMW XM pulls slightly stronger with 1000 Nm compared to 800 Nm. That’s about 200 Nm difference.
XM
@ BMW Group Press
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: BMW XM offers distinct more seating capacity – 7 vs 5.
In curb weight, Land Rover Range Rover Sport is a bit lighter – 2390 kg compared to 2695 kg. The difference is around 305 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport offers a bit more room – 647 L compared to 527 L. That’s a difference of about 120 L.
In maximum load capacity, the BMW XM performs slightly better – up to 1820 L, which is about 329 L more than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport.
When it comes to payload, Land Rover Range Rover Sport evident takes the win – 830 kg compared to 525 kg. That’s a difference of about 305 kg.
Who wins the race?
The Land Rover Range Rover Sport proves to be dominates this comparison and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Land Rover Range Rover Sport is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
from about £78,600
@ Jaguar Land Rover Media
Land Rover Range Rover Sport
BMW XM
The BMW XM represents a bold foray into the high-performance luxury SUV market with its striking design and powerful hybrid drive. This model melds cutting-edge technology with opulence, offering an unparalleled driving experience. Its interior is meticulously crafted, providing both driver and passengers with supreme comfort and innovative connectivity features.
details
@ BMW Group Press
@ BMW Group Press
@ BMW Group Press
@ BMW Group Press
Land Rover Range Rover Sport
The Land Rover Range Rover Sport exudes a commanding presence, combining luxury with exceptional off-road capabilities. Its sleek, modern design is complemented by a meticulously crafted interior that offers both comfort and advanced technology. With its powerful performance and refined handling, this vehicle is ideal for both urban environments and adventurous terrains.
details
@ Jaguar Land Rover Media
@ Jaguar Land Rover Media
@ Jaguar Land Rover Media
BMW XM
Land Rover Range Rover Sport
|
@ BMW Group Press
|
@ Jaguar Land Rover Media
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
114700 - 157200 £
|
Price
78600 - 175700 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.7 - 6.1 L
|
Consumption L/100km
2.7 - 11.7 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
77 - 80 km
|
Electric Range
116 - 118 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
25.70 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
31.80 kWh
|
|
co2
105 - 138 g/km
|
co2
61 - 266 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
69 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
71 - 90 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
7
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
2695 - 2795 kg
|
Curb weight
2390 - 2810 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
527 L
|
Trunk capacity
647 L
|
|
Length
5110 mm
|
Length
4946 - 4970 mm
|
|
Width
2005 mm
|
Width
2043 mm
|
|
Height
1755 mm
|
Height
1814 - 1820 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1820 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1491 L
|
|
Payload
505 - 525 kg
|
Payload
640 - 830 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
476 - 748 HP
|
Power HP
249 - 635 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 5.1 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 7.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
250 km/h
|
Max Speed
206 - 290 km/h
|
|
Torque
700 - 1000 Nm
|
Torque
570 - 800 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
6 - 8
|
Number of Cylinders
6 - 8
|
|
Power kW
350 - 550 kW
|
Power kW
183 - 467 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
2998 - 4395 cm3
|
Engine capacity
2997 - 4395 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, G
|
|
Brand
BMW
|
Brand
Land Rover
|
What drive types are available for the BMW XM?
The BMW XM is available as All-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.