Compare performance (212 HP vs 269 HP), boot space and price (30,800 £ vs 67,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – BYD Atto 2 or Ford Transit Transporter?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
BYD Atto 2 is considerably cheaper – starting at 30,800 £ , while the Ford Transit Transporter costs 67,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 36,461 £.
As for electric range, the BYD Atto 2 offers barely more range – reaching up to 430 km, about 28 km more than the Ford Transit Transporter.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Transit Transporter offers noticeably more power – delivering 269 HP compared to 212 HP. That’s roughly 57 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Transit Transporter delivers markedly more torque with 430 Nm compared to 310 Nm. That’s about 120 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Ford Transit Transporter offers more seats – 6 vs 5.
The BYD Atto 2 is slightly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The BYD Atto 2 is a stylish compact electric SUV that blends bold exterior design with a roomy, tech-focused interior, making it well suited to daily driving and urban life. It delivers a comfortable ride and practical features that will appeal to buyers looking for a modern, user-friendly EV.
detailsThe Ford Transit is the no-nonsense workhorse that turns heavy-duty hauling into a surprisingly civilized experience, with a cabin that favors practicality over pretense. It’s the go-to for tradespeople and fleet managers who want reliability, adaptability and low running headaches — not showy gimmicks.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
30,800 - 36,000 £
|
Price
67,300 - 73,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.8 - 17.4 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
40 - 430 km
|
Electric Range
341 - 402 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 72 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
3 - 6
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,510 - 1,720 kg
|
Curb weight
-
|
|
Trunk capacity
425 - 450 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,830 mm
|
Width
2,059 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
420 - 490 kg
|
Payload
-
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
166 - 212 HP
|
Power HP
184 - 269 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.5 - 9.1 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
310 Nm
|
Torque
430 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
122 - 156 kW
|
Power kW
135 - 198 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,498 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
BYD
|
Brand
Ford
|