Compare performance (517 HP vs 551 HP), boot space and price (64,300 £ vs 68,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – BYD Tang or Hongqi E-HS9?
The race is on, as two electric SUVs from China's automotive powerhouses, BYD and Hongqi, take center stage in the crossover market. The BYD Tang and the Hongqi E-HS9 both aim to set benchmarks in performance and design for 2024, offering sustainable alternatives without compromising luxury and power. Let’s dig deeper into what each vehicle brings to the table.
The BYD Tang is equipped with an all-wheel-drive system that delivers 517 HP and a torque of 680 Nm through its electric motors. It boasts a rapid acceleration time from 0 to 100 km/h in just 4.9 seconds. The Tang's power comes from a 380 kW setup, operating with a consumption rate of 24 kWh per 100 km and offering an impressive electric range of 530 km.
On the other hand, the Hongqi E-HS9 showcases slightly more horsepower at 551 HP, with torque numbers reaching 670 Nm. Surpassing its competitor in speed, the E-HS9 hits a top speed of 200 km/h, compared to Tang’s 190 km/h. It too accelerates from 0 to 100 km/h in 4.9 seconds. The dual battery options provide flexibility, with a consumption as low as 19.4 kWh per 100 km, enabling a range between 465 to 515 km, depending on battery choice.
Both vehicles emphasize cutting-edge technology and eco-friendly performance. The BYD Tang is particularly noted for its efficient power distribution and reduction gearbox transmission, ensuring power is harnessed to deliver optimal torque and speed without wasting energy. With a CO2 efficiency class of A, it proudly boasts zero emissions.
The Hongqi E-HS9 pushes innovation a step further with its larger battery capacity options at both 90 kWh and 111 kWh, offering generous ranges and rapid charging capabilities. Its all-wheel-drive system is skillfully tuned for agility and comfort, making it a formidable contender in urban and off-road settings alike.
Standing at 4970 mm in length, 1955 mm in width, and 1745 mm in height, the BYD Tang presents a compellingly sleek profile, designed for both aesthetics and aerodynamics. In contrast, the E-HS9, at 5209 mm long and 2010 mm wide, makes its presence felt with a more imposing posture, catering to drivers who prefer a grander and more luxurious appearance.
Both vehicles provide ample interior space with seven-seat configurations, allowing flexibility and comfort for family trips and urban explorations. The Tang covers practical needs with a trunk capacity of 235 liters, whereas the E-HS9 seems to prioritize passenger space, resulting in a lower emphasis on storage capacity.
Ultimately, the choice between the BYD Tang and Hongqi E-HS9 depends largely on the buyer's preferences for power, design, and range. The Tang may attract those looking for slightly better range and reduced operational costs, while the E-HS9 appeals to consumers who prioritize top speed and battery capacity options. Both models demonstrate that the future of SUVs is indeed electric, offering sustainable performance with no compromise on luxury or power.
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
BYD Tang is only slightly cheaper – starting at 64,300 £ , while the Hongqi E-HS9 costs 68,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4,282 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Hongqi E-HS9 is markedly more efficient: consuming 19.4 kWh/100km compared to 24 kWh/100km for the BYD Tang. That’s a difference of about 4.6 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the BYD Tang offers barely more range – reaching up to 530 km, about 15 km more than the Hongqi E-HS9.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Hongqi E-HS9 offers very slightly more power – delivering 551 HP compared to 517 HP. That’s roughly 34 HP more horsepower.
Both models accelerate almost equally fast – 4.9 s from 0 to 100 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the BYD Tang delivers very slightly more torque with 680 Nm compared to 670 Nm. That’s about 10 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 7 people.
In terms of curb weight, BYD Tang is barely lighter – 2,630 kg compared to 2,705 kg. The difference is around 75 kg.
Looking at boot space, the BYD Tang offers substantially more boot space – 235 L compared to 0 L. That’s a difference of about 235 L.
When it comes to payload, the BYD Tang carries somewhat more – 575 kg compared to 475 kg. That’s a difference of about 100 kg.
The BYD Tang is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The BYD Tang is a bold, tech-loaded SUV that blends striking design with roomy practicality, making it equally at home on the school run and the open road. Packed with clever tech and a powertrain that mixes efficiency with eager performance, it’s a smart, value-focused pick for buyers who want electric-age comfort without the premium-brand fuss.
details
The Hongqi E-HS9 arrives like a modern state limousine rewired into an electric SUV, all imposing chrome, tall presence and an interior that aims to cocoon occupants in luxury. It's serenely quiet and packed with tech, offering a compelling, slightly quirky alternative to established European luxury SUVs for buyers who want drama as much as comfort.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
64,300 £
|
Price
68,600 - 88,300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
24 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
19.4 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
530 km
|
Electric Range
465 - 515 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
7
|
Seats
6 - 7
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,630 kg
|
Curb weight
2,705 - 2,777 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
235 L
|
Trunk capacity
0 L
|
|
Length
4,970 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,955 mm
|
Width
2,010 mm
|
|
Height
1,745 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,655 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
575 kg
|
Payload
455 - 475 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
517 HP
|
Power HP
551 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
190 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
680 Nm
|
Torque
670 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
380 kW
|
Power kW
405 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024
|
Model Year
2,024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
BYD
|
Brand
Hongqi
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España