VS

BYD Tang vs Mercedes EQV – Which model is better for everyday use?

Compare performance, boot capacity, efficiency and price at a glance.
Find out which car is the better choice for you – BYD Tang or Mercedes EQV?

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Tang @ press.bydauto.be

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Mercedes EQV has a evident advantage in terms of price – it starts at 50700 £, while the BYD Tang costs 64300 £. That’s a price difference of around 13538 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the BYD Tang: with 24 kWh per 100 km, it’s a bit more efficient than the Mercedes EQV with 27.10 kWh. That’s a difference of about 3.10 kWh.

As for range, the BYD Tang performs clearly perceptible better – achieving up to 530 km, about 166 km more than the Mercedes EQV.

EQV @ group-media.mercedes-benz.com

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the BYD Tang has a clearly edge – offering 517 HP compared to 204 HP. That’s roughly 313 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the BYD Tang is decisively quicker – completing the sprint in 4.90 s, while the Mercedes EQV takes 10.30 s. That’s about 5.40 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the BYD Tang performs noticeable better – reaching 190 km/h, while the Mercedes EQV tops out at 140 km/h. The difference is around 50 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: BYD Tang pulls significantly stronger with 680 Nm compared to 365 Nm. That’s about 315 Nm difference.

Tang @ press.bydauto.be

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: BYD Tang offers somewhat more seating capacity – 7 vs 6.

In curb weight, BYD Tang is hardly perceptible lighter – 2630 kg compared to 2666 kg. The difference is around 36 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Mercedes EQV offers significantly more room – 1410 L compared to 235 L. That’s a difference of about 1175 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Mercedes EQV performs significantly better – up to 5010 L, which is about 3355 L more than the BYD Tang.

When it comes to payload, Mercedes EQV clearly perceptible takes the win – 834 kg compared to 575 kg. That’s a difference of about 259 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the BYD Tang shows itself to be is largely superior and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

about £64,285
8ee4e329-3f72-45c5-9cb4-b63b5ddb555e

BYD Tang

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 517 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 24 kWh
  • Electric Range : 530 km
details

BYD Tang

The BYD Tang represents a bold entry into the competitive SUV market, blending cutting-edge technology with modern design aesthetics. Its spacious interior is complemented by high-quality materials and innovative features, making it a strong contender for families and tech enthusiasts alike. With an emphasis on sustainability, the Tang offers an eco-friendly driving experience without compromising on performance or luxury.

details
8ee4e329-3f72-45c5-9cb4-b63b5ddb555e @ press.bydauto.be
de335338-ec26-419d-842a-9f53ec65c2c6 @ press.bydauto.be
9fcec901-74bd-4e0f-8761-2897e2f597bf @ press.bydauto.be
24737df2-4e98-4799-b7e2-d4d5c2437265 @ press.bydauto.be
c342d66a-80aa-4960-abc4-26de29271816 @ press.bydauto.be

Mercedes EQV

The Mercedes-Benz EQV stands out as a versatile electric vehicle combining luxury with practicality, making it an ideal choice for environmentally conscious families. With its spacious interior and sleek design, it offers a premium driving experience that aligns with the brand's reputation for quality and innovation. As a sustainable option in the realm of people carriers, it exhibits the perfect balance between cutting-edge technology and everyday usability.

details
20C0436_002 @ group-media.mercedes-benz.com
20C0436_005 @ group-media.mercedes-benz.com
21C0751_002 @ group-media.mercedes-benz.com
22C0258_036 @ group-media.mercedes-benz.com
19C0643_114 @ group-media.mercedes-benz.com

Similar Comparisons

BYD Tang
XPeng G9
VS
The BYD Tang and XPeng G9 are two compelling contenders in the growing electric SUV market, each offering unique features and striking designs. The Tang impresses with its spacious interior and robust battery range, making it a practical choice for families on the go. Meanwhile, the G9 stands out for its advanced tech features and innovative user interface, appealing to tech-savvy drivers looking for a connected driving experience.
BYD Tang
Hyundai IONIQ 9
VS
BYD Tang
Mercedes EQV
Tang
EQV

Costs and Consumption
Price
64300 £
Price
50700 - 54400 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
24 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
27.1 - 27.5 kWh
Electric Range
530 km
Electric Range
244 - 364 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
60 - 90 kWh
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Bus
Seats
7
Seats
6
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
2630 kg
Curb weight
2666 - 2863 kg
Trunk capacity
235 L
Trunk capacity
1030 - 1410 L
Length
4970 mm
Length
5140 - 5370 mm
Width
1955 mm
Width
1928 mm
Height
1745 mm
Height
1920 - 1923 mm
Max trunk capacity
1655 L
Max trunk capacity
4630 - 5010 L
Payload
575 kg
Payload
637 - 834 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
517 HP
Power HP
204 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.90 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.3 - 12.1 s
Max Speed
190 km/h
Max Speed
140 km/h
Torque
680 Nm
Torque
365 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
380 kW
Power kW
150 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2024
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
BYD
Brand
Mercedes-Benz

Similar Comparisons

BYD Tang
BYD Sealion 7
VS
In the competitive world of electric SUVs, the BYD Tang and the BYD Sealion 7 offer unique strengths catering to diverse consumer needs. The Tang, renowned for its powerful dual-motor system and luxurious interior, provides an exhilarating driving experience with top-tier refinement. Meanwhile, the Sealion 7 stands out with its futuristic design and impressive range, making it a perfect choice for eco-conscious drivers seeking a balance between performance and sustainability.
Mercedes EQV
Mercedes V Class
VS
BYD Seal U
BYD Tang
VS
The BYD Seal U and BYD Tang showcase the brand's commitment to electric innovation, each catering to different segments of the growing EV market. While the Seal U emphasizes agility and sleek design, making it ideal for urban commuting, the Tang stands out with its spacious interior and family-friendly features, perfect for longer journeys. Both models highlight BYD's advanced technology, but consumers will need to weigh their priorities between style and practicality to choose the right fit.
BYD Seal
BYD Tang
VS
BYD Tang
Volvo EX90
VS
In the increasingly competitive electric SUV market, the BYD Tang and Volvo EX90 stand out with their unique blend of performance and technology. The Tang impresses with its spacious interior and strong range, appealing to families seeking practicality without compromising on style. Meanwhile, the EX90 showcases Volvo’s commitment to safety and luxury, featuring advanced driver-assistance systems and a premium finish that's hard to beat.
Mercedes EQV
Mercedes Marco Polo
VS
Mercedes EQV
Hyundai IONIQ 9
VS
BYD Tang
Hyundai Santa Fe
VS
Is the BYD Tang offered with different drivetrains?

The BYD Tang is available as All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.