Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
BYD Tang vs Renault Kangoo Compact Van – Which one offers the better deal?
Tang
@ BYD Auto / BYD Global Media
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Renault Kangoo Compact Van has a significantly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 22400 £, while the BYD Tang costs 64300 £. That’s a price difference of around 41845 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Renault Kangoo Compact Van: with 18.70 kWh per 100 km, it’s distinct more efficient than the BYD Tang with 24 kWh. That’s a difference of about 5.30 kWh.
As for range, the BYD Tang performs significantly better – achieving up to 530 km, about 240 km more than the Renault Kangoo Compact Van.
Kangoo Compact Van
@ Renault Group Media
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the BYD Tang has a significantly edge – offering 517 HP compared to 122 HP. That’s roughly 395 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the BYD Tang is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.90 s, while the Renault Kangoo Compact Van takes 11.60 s. That’s about 6.70 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the BYD Tang performs barely noticeable better – reaching 190 km/h, while the Renault Kangoo Compact Van tops out at 176 km/h. The difference is around 14 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: BYD Tang pulls decisively stronger with 680 Nm compared to 270 Nm. That’s about 410 Nm difference.
Tang
@ BYD Auto / BYD Global Media
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Seats: BYD Tang offers clearly perceptible more seating capacity – 7 vs 5.
In curb weight, Renault Kangoo Compact Van is significantly lighter – 1493 kg compared to 2630 kg. The difference is around 1137 kg.
In maximum load capacity, the Renault Kangoo Compact Van performs decisively better – up to 4900 L, which is about 3245 L more than the BYD Tang.
When it comes to payload, Renault Kangoo Compact Van clearly perceptible takes the win – 901 kg compared to 575 kg. That’s a difference of about 326 kg.
Who wins the race?
The BYD Tang proves to be wins by a narrow margin and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
BYD Tang is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
BYD Tang
Renault Kangoo Compact Van
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
about £64,285
@ BYD Auto / BYD Global Media
BYD Tang
BYD Tang
The BYD Tang is a bold, tech-loaded SUV that blends striking design with roomy practicality, making it equally at home on the school run and the open road. Packed with clever tech and a powertrain that mixes efficiency with eager performance, it’s a smart, value-focused pick for buyers who want electric-age comfort without the premium-brand fuss.
details
@ BYD Auto / BYD Global Media
@ BYD Auto / BYD Global Media
@ BYD Auto / BYD Global Media
@ BYD Auto / BYD Global Media
@ BYD Auto / BYD Global Media
Renault Kangoo Compact Van
The Renault Kangoo is a practical, no-nonsense compact van that turns urban deliveries and weekend DIY runs into a surprisingly easy chore. Roomy for its size, comfortable to drive and brimming with smart storage solutions, it’s a sensible pick for anyone who needs honest utility without drama.
details
@ Renault Group Media
@ Renault Group Media
@ Renault Group Media
@ Renault Group Media
@ Renault Group Media
@ Renault Group Media
BYD Tang
Renault Kangoo Compact Van
|
@ BYD Auto / BYD Global Media
|
@ Renault Group Media
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
64300 £
|
Price
22400 - 37000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
5.1 - 5.5 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
24 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
18.7 - 21.1 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
530 km
|
Electric Range
261 - 290 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 - 151 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
54 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
|
Seats
7
|
Seats
2 - 5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
4 - 5
|
|
Curb weight
2630 kg
|
Curb weight
1493 - 1910 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
235 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
4970 mm
|
Length
4486 - 4910 mm
|
|
Width
1955 mm
|
Width
1860 mm
|
|
Height
1745 mm
|
Height
1854 - 1864 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1655 L
|
Max trunk capacity
3000 - 4900 L
|
|
Payload
575 kg
|
Payload
498 - 901 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
517 HP
|
Power HP
75 - 122 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.90 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.6 - 18.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
190 km/h
|
Max Speed
132 - 176 km/h
|
|
Torque
680 Nm
|
Torque
230 - 270 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
380 kW
|
Power kW
55 - 90 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
1461 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2022 - 2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, A
|
|
Brand
BYD
|
Brand
Renault
|
Is the BYD Tang offered with different drivetrains?
The BYD Tang is available as All-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.