Compare performance (156 HP vs 442 HP), boot space and price (20,600 £ vs 46,500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Citroen C4 or Volvo EC40?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Citroen C4 is considerably cheaper – starting at 20,600 £ , while the Volvo EC40 costs 46,500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 25,972 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Citroen C4 is slightly more efficient: consuming 14.6 kWh/100km compared to 16.2 kWh/100km for the Volvo EC40. That’s a difference of about 1.6 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Volvo EC40 offers clearly more range – reaching up to 585 km, about 158 km more than the Citroen C4.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo EC40 offers considerably more power – delivering 442 HP compared to 156 HP. That’s roughly 286 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo EC40 is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.6 s, while the Citroen C4 takes 8 s. That’s about 3.4 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo EC40 delivers significantly more torque with 670 Nm compared to 270 Nm. That’s about 400 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Citroen C4 is clearly lighter – 1,403 kg compared to 2,065 kg. The difference is around 662 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Citroen C4 offers markedly more boot space – 510 L compared to 404 L. That’s a difference of about 106 L.
When it comes to payload, the Volvo EC40 carries only slightly more – 435 kg compared to 406 kg. That’s a difference of about 29 kg.
The Volvo EC40 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Citroën C4 wears its French eccentricity with confidence, pairing bold, sculpted styling with a supremely comfortable ride that turns mundane commutes into a gentler affair. If you value relaxed comfort, clever practicality and a car with personality rather than pretence, the C4 is a charming, sensible choice — and it won't make you miss the usual hot‑hatch theatrics.
detailsThe Volvo EC40 feels like a polished slice of Scandinavian calm on wheels, blending minimalist design with a cocoon-like interior that makes everyday driving surprisingly serene. It’s an electric compact that puts safety and comfort front and center, while still injecting enough personality and tech-savvy charm to keep city buyers smiling.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
20,600 - 32,200 £
|
Price
46,500 - 59,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.7 - 4.8 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.6 - 15.3 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.2 - 17.3 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
354 - 427 km
|
Electric Range
486 - 585 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 108 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,403 - 1,652 kg
|
Curb weight
2,065 - 2,185 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
380 - 510 L
|
Trunk capacity
404 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,800 - 1,834 mm
|
Width
1,873 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
379 - 406 kg
|
Payload
395 - 435 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
110 - 156 HP
|
Power HP
238 - 442 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 10.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 7.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
205 - 270 Nm
|
Torque
420 - 670 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
81 - 115 kW
|
Power kW
175 - 325 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,199 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Citroen
|
Brand
Volvo
|