VS

Citroen Jumpy Transporter vs Hongqi E-HS9 – Which car suits you better?

Everyday use, family trips or long-distance drives – here’s where the differences show.
Discover whether Citroen Jumpy Transporter or Hongqi E-HS9 fits your lifestyle better.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Citroen Jumpy Transporter has a convincingly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 32100 £, while the Hongqi E-HS9 costs 68600 £. That’s a price difference of around 36437 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Hongqi E-HS9: with 19.40 kWh per 100 km, it’s distinct more efficient than the Citroen Jumpy Transporter with 23.60 kWh. That’s a difference of about 4.20 kWh.

As for range, the Hongqi E-HS9 performs evident better – achieving up to 515 km, about 187 km more than the Citroen Jumpy Transporter.

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Hongqi E-HS9 has a decisively edge – offering 551 HP compared to 180 HP. That’s roughly 371 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Hongqi E-HS9 is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.90 s, while the Citroen Jumpy Transporter takes 12.10 s. That’s about 7.20 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Hongqi E-HS9 performs slightly better – reaching 200 km/h, while the Citroen Jumpy Transporter tops out at 160 km/h. The difference is around 40 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Hongqi E-HS9 pulls significantly stronger with 670 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 270 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Seats: Hongqi E-HS9 offers slightly more seating capacity – 7 vs 6.

In curb weight, Citroen Jumpy Transporter is clearly lighter – 1722 kg compared to 2705 kg. The difference is around 983 kg.

When it comes to payload, Citroen Jumpy Transporter clearly takes the win – 1226 kg compared to 475 kg. That’s a difference of about 751 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Hongqi E-HS9 shows itself to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £68,600

Hongqi E-HS9

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 551 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 19.40 kWh
  • Electric Range : 465 - 515 km
details

Citroen Jumpy Transporter

The Citroen Jumpy Transporter exemplifies versatility and practicality, making it an ideal choice for both urban and long-distance driving. With its spacious interior and advanced features, it caters to a range of commercial needs while ensuring comfort for the driver. The Jumpy also boasts a contemporary design, reflecting Citroen's commitment to style and functionality.

details

Hongqi E-HS9

The Hongqi E-HS9 embodies a seamless blend of elegance and electric innovation, marking a bold entry into the luxury SUV market. Its sleek design exudes a certain majestic presence, while the spacious interior is adorned with premium materials, offering a truly luxurious driving experience. Advanced technology integrated throughout ensures a ride that is not only smooth but also efficiently powered, setting new standards for modern electric vehicles.

details

Similar Comparisons

XPeng G9
Hongqi E-HS9
VS
In the rapidly evolving electric SUV market, the XPeng G9 and the Hongqi E-HS9 stand out as formidable contenders, each offering unique strengths. The XPeng G9 impresses with its advanced autonomous driving features and sleek design, ideal for tech-savvy drivers. Meanwhile, the Hongqi E-HS9 boasts a luxurious interior and a commanding road presence, catering to those who value refinement and grandeur.
Citroen Jumpy Transporter
Citroen Jumper
VS
When comparing the Citroën Jumpy and the Citroën Jumper, key differences revolve around size and capacity. The Jumpy, also known as the Dispatch in some markets, offers a nimble alternative suited for urban deliveries and tighter spaces. In contrast, the Jumper, or Relay in certain regions, is designed for heavier loads and more extensive cargo needs, making it ideal for businesses requiring ample hauling capacity.
Citroen Jumpy Transporter
Hongqi E-HS9

Costs and Consumption
Price
32100 - 52000 £
Price
68600 - 88300 £
Consumption L/100km
6.2 - 6.5 L
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
23.6 - 24.7 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
19.40 kWh
Electric Range
222 - 328 km
Electric Range
465 - 515 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
90 - 111 kWh
co2
0 - 199 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
69 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Cargo Van
Body Type
SUV
Seats
3 - 6
Seats
6 - 7
Doors
4
Doors
5
Curb weight
1722 - 2188 kg
Curb weight
2705 - 2777 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
0 L
Length
4959 - 5309 mm
Length
5209 mm
Width
1920 mm
Width
2010 mm
Height
1895 - 1935 mm
Height
1713 - 1731 mm
Max trunk capacity
3200 - 6100 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
881 - 1226 kg
Payload
455 - 475 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric, Diesel
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
120 - 180 HP
Power HP
551 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
12.1 - 13.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.90 s
Max Speed
130 - 160 km/h
Max Speed
200 km/h
Torque
260 - 400 Nm
Torque
670 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
88 - 132 kW
Power kW
405 kW
Engine capacity
1499 - 2184 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2024 - 2025
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, F, G
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Citroen
Brand
Hongqi

Similar Comparisons

ZEEKR X
Hongqi E-HS9
VS
BYD Tang
Hongqi E-HS9
VS
In a striking comparison between the BYD Tang and the Hongqi E-HS9, these two electric SUVs showcase distinct strengths in the rapidly evolving automotive landscape. The BYD Tang impresses with its efficient energy consumption and advanced hybrid system, offering an enticing balance of performance and practicality for environmentally conscious drivers. Conversely, the Hongqi E-HS9 caters to luxury enthusiasts, boasting a sophisticated design and a plush interior that highlights its premium market positioning.
Citroen Berlingo
Citroen Jumpy Transporter
VS
The Citroen Berlingo and Citroen Jumpy Transporter each cater to distinct needs yet share the brand's hallmark of utility and versatility. The Berlingo, with its compact size and nimble handling, is ideal for urban environments where maneuverability and practicality are paramount. In contrast, the Jumpy Transporter offers superior cargo space and payload capacity, making it the go-to choice for those requiring extra room and more robust capabilities for transporting goods or larger groups.
Citroen Jumpy Transporter
Ford Transit Bus
VS
Toyota bZ4X
Hongqi E-HS9
VS
Genesis G90
Hongqi E-HS9
VS
Hongqi E-HS9
Fiat Grande Panda
VS
Hongqi E-HS9
ZEEKR 7X
VS
What drive types are available for the Citroen Jumpy Transporter?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.