VS

Citroen Jumpy Transporter vs Mercedes Vito Transporter comparison

Compare performance (180 HP vs 237 HP), boot space and price (32,100 £ vs 28,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Citroen Jumpy Transporter or Mercedes Vito Transporter?

Citroen Jumpy Transporter vs Mercedes Vito Transporter: Key differences

Citroen Jumpy Transporter

  • barely more efficient
  • somewhat lighter
details

Mercedes Vito Transporter

  • moderately cheaper
  • clearly more power
  • slightly more efficient
  • noticeably more electric range
details

By Achim Sedelmaier

Jumpy Transporter

In the competitive realm of commercial vehicles, the Citroen Jumpy Transporter and the Mercedes Vito Transporter stand out as formidable options for businesses and personal use alike. Both models cater to the needs of van buyers looking for reliability, efficiency, and innovation, but they each bring unique strengths to the table. This article delves into the technical aspects and innovations of these two popular cargo vans.

Vito Transporter

Performance Comparison

The Citroen Jumpy Transporter offers a versatile choice with both diesel and electric engines, providing various power options ranging from 120 HP to an impressive 177 HP. This allows users to select the model that best suits their requirements. The diesel engines exhibit fuel consumption figures between 6.6 L/100 km to 7.7 L/100 km, while the electric version boasts an efficiency of approximately 24.5 kWh/100 km and has an electric range of up to 328 km.

On the other hand, the Mercedes Vito Transporter showcases a broader power range, with engine outputs ranging from 102 HP to a robust 237 HP, accommodating different driving needs from city delivery to long-haul transportation. With diesel consumption figures ranging from 6.8 L/100 km to 7.9 L/100 km and an electric variant featuring a range of up to 313 km, the Vito aligns well with modern demands for eco-friendly transport solutions.

Transmission and Drive Options

Both models feature multiple transmission options, including manual and automatic gearboxes, catering to various driver preferences. The Citroen Jumpy offers a front-wheel-drive setup, which is advantageous for efficient load handling and maneuverability in tight spaces. Meanwhile, the Vito Transporter provides versatility with rear-wheel-drive, front-wheel-drive, and all-wheel-drive options. This flexibility allows for optimized performance based on load and driving conditions.

Dimensions and Payload Capacity

When it comes to dimensions, the Citroen Jumpy measures 5309 mm in length and 1920 mm in width, providing a considerable payload capacity of up to 1333 kg. This makes it perfect for larger payloads while maintaining a manageable size for urban environments.

The Mercedes Vito, slightly longer at 5370 mm, offers a width of 1928 mm. However, its payload capacity ranges around 950 kg to 1000 kg, depending on the variant chosen. Both vans provide ample cargo space, making them suitable for a variety of business applications.

Safety and Innovation Features

Both brands emphasize safety and innovation in their design. The Citroen Jumpy Transporter includes advanced safety features like lane departure warning and emergency braking systems, critical for urban driving scenarios. The innovative electric variant of the Jumpy also showcases Citroen's commitment to ecological considerations, allowing businesses to reduce their carbon footprint significantly.

Contrastingly, the Mercedes Vito showcases the brand's reputation for luxury and innovation even in commercial vehicles. With features like adaptive cruise control, parking assistance, and a modern infotainment system, it presents a blend of comfort and practicality. The safety systems, including traction control and stability systems, help enhance driver confidence on the road.

Conclusion

In summary, both the Citroen Jumpy Transporter and the Mercedes Vito Transporter cater to the demands of modern business with their blend of performance, efficiency, and safety features. The choice between the two will largely depend on the specific needs of the user – whether it’s the excellent payload capacity and eco-friendly options from the Jumpy or the reliable performance and advanced technology of the Vito. Ultimately, both vehicles represent the best of what the commercial vehicle segment has to offer.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Jumpy Transporter

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Mercedes Vito Transporter is moderately cheaper – starting at 28,800 £ , while the Citroen Jumpy Transporter costs 32,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3,348 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Citroen Jumpy Transporter uses 6.2 L/100km and is barely more efficient than the Mercedes Vito Transporter with 6.8 L/100km. The difference is about 0.6 L/100km.

In terms of energy consumption, the Mercedes Vito Transporter is slightly more efficient: consuming 21.2 kWh/100km compared to 23.6 kWh/100km for the Citroen Jumpy Transporter. That’s a difference of about 2.4 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Mercedes Vito Transporter offers noticeably more range – reaching up to 474 km, about 146 km more than the Citroen Jumpy Transporter.

Vito Transporter

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes Vito Transporter offers clearly more power – delivering 237 HP compared to 180 HP. That’s roughly 57 HP more horsepower.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mercedes Vito Transporter delivers slightly more torque with 500 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 100 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: Citroen Jumpy Transporter offers more seats – 6 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Citroen Jumpy Transporter is somewhat lighter – 1,722 kg compared to 1,916 kg. The difference is around 194 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Citroen Jumpy Transporter carries visibly more – 1,226 kg compared to 884 kg. That’s a difference of about 342 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mercedes Vito Transporter leads convincingly in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £28,800
Vito Transporter

Mercedes Vito Transporter

  • Engine Type Diesel, Electric, Petrol
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 102 - 237 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 6.8 - 9.7 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km 21.2 - 26.5 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 304 - 474 km
Citroen Jumpy Transporter
Mercedes Vito Transporter

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Citroen Jumpy Transporter

The Citroën Dispatch is a steady, no-nonsense transporter that swallows workday demands with quiet confidence while keeping drivers comfortable on long runs. Practical, economical and unfussy, it’s the kind of van that won’t steal the show but will make sure your business runs smoother — and that’s often exactly what you want.

details

Mercedes Vito Transporter

The Mercedes Vito Transporter is a supremely practical workhorse that blends Mercedes refinement with van-like utility, making long days on the road feel surprisingly civilized. With a cleverly thought-out interior and a drive that won’t wear you out, the Vito is the ideal choice for businesses that want capability without sacrificing comfort — and yes, it still looks sharper than most vans at a client meeting.

details
Citroen Jumpy Transporter
Mercedes Vito Transporter

Costs and Consumption

Price
32,100 - 52,000 £
Price
28,800 - 51,600 £
Consumption L/100km
6.2 - 6.5 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
6.8 - 9.7 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
23.6 - 24.7 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
21.2 - 26.5 kWh/100km
Electric Range
222 - 328 km
Electric Range
304 - 474 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
60 - 90 kWh
co2
0 - 199 g/km
co2
0 - 222 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
57 - 70 L

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Cargo Van
Body Type
Cargo Van
Seats
3 - 6
Seats
2 - 5
Doors
-
Doors
4
Curb weight
1,722 - 2,188 kg
Curb weight
1,916 - 2,518 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
4,895 - 5,390 mm
Width
1,920 mm
Width
1,928 mm
Height
-
Height
1,910 - 1,945 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
3,100 - 6,600 L
Payload
881 - 1,226 kg
Payload
547 - 884 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric, Diesel
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric, Petrol
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
120 - 180 HP
Power HP
102 - 237 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
12.1 - 13.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
120 - 140 km/h
Torque
260 - 400 Nm
Torque
270 - 500 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
88 - 132 kW
Power kW
75 - 174 kW
Engine capacity
1,499 - 2,184 cm3
Engine capacity
1,950 - 1,999 cm3

General

Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, F, G
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, A
Brand
Citroen
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.