Compare performance (180 HP vs 136 HP), boot space and price (32,100 £ vs 26,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Citroen Jumpy Transporter or Peugeot Partner?
In the dynamic world of cargo vans, two models are currently making waves among enthusiasts and professionals alike: the Citroen Jumpy Transporter and the Peugeot Socio. Both offering distinct features and innovations, they come frilled with multiple engine options and stand as formidable contenders in the market.
The Citroen Jumpy Transporter provides potential buyers with a choice between diesel and electric engines. It ranges in power output from 120 HP up to a more robust 177 HP. The diesel variant boasts an impressive consumption rate of 6.6 to 7.7 L/100km, while the electric version offers a reasonable 24 to 24.7 kWh/100km. Notably, the electric model presents a range from 222 km to an impressive 328 km on a single charge, supporting its viability for both urban and longer routes.
On the other hand, the Peugeot Socio is equally versatile, with options for electric, diesel, and petrol engines. The Socio keeps it efficient, with the diesel variants consuming as low as 5.2 to 6.3 L/100km, and an electric consumption of 17.4 kWh/100km. The Socio’s electric range stands superior at 354 km, amplifying its appeal for eco-conscious customers.
The Jumpy Transporter, with its robust engine configuration, can accelerate from 0 to 100 km/h in 12.1 seconds. In contrast, the Peugeot Socio has a slightly wider span in its acceleration timing, ranging from 11.2 to 14.8 seconds, depending on the engine. While the Jumpy's top speed can reach up to 185 km/h, the Socio offers a near match at up to 184 km/h.
From a torque perspective, the Jumpy holds a strong lineup with a maximum torque reaching 400 Nm. Meanwhile, the Socio's maximum torque is 300 Nm, perfectly adequate for navigating both city streets and countryside roads.
In terms of dimensions, the Citroen Jumpy is slightly larger, measuring between 4959 mm to 5309 mm in length. It's also broader at 1920 mm wide. The Peugeot Socio, with lengths at 4401 to 4751 mm and a width of 1848 mm, is a bit more compact, advantageous for urban maneuverability.
The Jumpy has options for up to 6 seats, making it ideal for transporting larger crews along with cargo. The Socio’s versatility shines in its seating arrangements, comfortably seating up to 5 while also providing up to 1800 liters of trunk space.
Both models offer electric options that produce zero emissions, aligning with contemporary eco-friendly standards. However, in terms of CO2 emissions from fuel engines, the Citroen Jumpy Transporter varies between 188 g/km and 203 g/km, while the Peugeot Socio maintains a lower footprint with emissions between 136 g/km and 143 g/km.
Ultimately, choosing between the Citroen Jumpy Transporter and the Peugeot Socio boils down to specific needs and preferences. The Jumpy is perfect for those requiring a capacity focus with high payloads and a broad engine range. Meanwhile, the Socio might suit those prioritizing eco-efficiency and urban navigation prowess. Both vehicles offer a remarkable set of features that cater to a wide array of professional and personal transportation requirements.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Peugeot Partner is clearly cheaper – starting at 26,100 £ , while the Citroen Jumpy Transporter costs 32,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6,018 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Peugeot Partner uses 5.2 L/100km and is a bit more efficient than the Citroen Jumpy Transporter with 6.2 L/100km. The difference is about 1 L/100km.
In terms of energy consumption, the Peugeot Partner is markedly more efficient: consuming 17.4 kWh/100km compared to 23.6 kWh/100km for the Citroen Jumpy Transporter. That’s a difference of about 6.2 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Peugeot Partner offers barely more range – reaching up to 354 km, about 26 km more than the Citroen Jumpy Transporter.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Citroen Jumpy Transporter offers markedly more power – delivering 180 HP compared to 136 HP. That’s roughly 44 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Peugeot Partner is barely quicker – completing the sprint in 11.2 s, while the Citroen Jumpy Transporter takes 12.1 s. That’s about 0.9 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Citroen Jumpy Transporter delivers markedly more torque with 400 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 100 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Citroen Jumpy Transporter offers more seats – 6 vs 3.
In terms of curb weight, Peugeot Partner is noticeably lighter – 1,371 kg compared to 1,722 kg. The difference is around 351 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Citroen Jumpy Transporter carries visibly more – 1,226 kg compared to 781 kg. That’s a difference of about 445 kg.
The Citroen Jumpy Transporter is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Citroën Dispatch is a steady, no-nonsense transporter that swallows workday demands with quiet confidence while keeping drivers comfortable on long runs. Practical, economical and unfussy, it’s the kind of van that won’t steal the show but will make sure your business runs smoother — and that’s often exactly what you want.
details
The Peugeot Partner is a no-nonsense workhorse that doubles as a surprisingly comfy family mover, combining clever storage solutions with an easy-to-live-in cabin. It won’t win any beauty contests, but for small businesses and active families it’s practical, economical and utterly reliable when the day gets busy.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
32,100 - 52,000 £
|
Price
26,100 - 33,500 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
6.2 - 6.5 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.2 - 5.4 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
23.6 - 24.7 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.4 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
222 - 328 km
|
Electric Range
354 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 199 g/km
|
co2
0 - 143 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
|
Seats
3 - 6
|
Seats
3
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,722 - 2,188 kg
|
Curb weight
1,371 - 1,674 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,920 mm
|
Width
1,848 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
881 - 1,226 kg
|
Payload
645 - 781 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Diesel
|
Engine Type
Electric, Diesel
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
120 - 180 HP
|
Power HP
102 - 136 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
12.1 - 13.3 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
260 - 400 Nm
|
Torque
250 - 300 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
88 - 132 kW
|
Power kW
75 - 100 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,499 - 2,184 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,499 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, F, G
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, E
|
|
Brand
Citroen
|
Brand
Peugeot
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España