Compare performance (136 HP vs 130 HP), boot space and price (22,400 £ vs 25,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Peugeot Partner or Renault Kangoo?
When it comes to utility vehicles, the choice between the Peugeot Socio and the Renault Kangoo is not as straightforward as one might assume. Both models, thriving in their respective niches, offer unique features that cater to the needs of business owners and families alike. As we delve into a comparison, it becomes clear why these vehicles are much more than mere workhorses.
The Peugeot Socio offers a range of power options spanning from electric to diesel and petrol engines, delivering between 102 and 136 horsepower. Notably, the electric variant provides an impressive range of up to 354 km on a single charge, with a consumption rate of 17.4 kWh/100km. For diesel and petrol engines, consumption ranges between 5.2 to 6.3 liters/100 km, finely balanced to offer both efficiency and performance.
In contrast, the Renault Kangoo, available in diesel, petrol, and electric configurations, outputs between 95 to 130 horsepower. The electric variants offer a slightly lesser range, with figures hovering between 278 and 285 km and consumption rates of up to 21.5 kWh/100 km. The internal combustion engines provide similar efficiency, with consumption rates between 5.2 to 7.1 liters/100 km.
Space and adaptability are crucial for vehicles in this segment, and here, both contenders rise to the challenge. The Peugeot Socio, with body dimensions measuring 4751 mm in length, 1848 mm in width, and 1812 mm in height, is compact yet spacious. With a maximum payload capacity stretching up to 991 kg and seating arrangements accommodating either two or five passengers, it offers great versatility for business and personal usage.
On the other hand, the Renault Kangoo, measuring 4911 mm in length, and slightly wider at 1919 mm, beams with space and practicality. The Kangoo can fit up to seven passengers, which could be a significant consideration for larger families or shuttle services. Though it has a lower payload capacity maxing out at 609 kg, its trunk capacity comfortably ranges up to 950 liters, perfect for cargo-heavy needs.
For the tech-savvy driver, the Peugeot Socio doesn't disappoint. With a front-wheel-drive layout and a plethora of high-tech transmission options such as a reduction gearbox for the electric variant, and both manual and automatic gearboxes for other models, the Socio offers a driving experience that is both engaging and efficient.
Renault Kangoo opts for simplicity and efficiency in its design, employing a manual gearbox and a dual-clutch automatic transmission for enhanced performance in urban settings. It does not miss out on safety and comfort either, highlighting a comprehensive suite of driver assistance systems that contribute to a smooth driving experience.
Choosing between the Peugeot Socio and Renault Kangoo largely hinges on the specific requirements of the user. The Socio excels in electrification and payload capabilities, while the Kangoo shines with its larger space and passenger capacity. Both vehicles embody the ethos of versatility, reliability, and modern automotive innovation, thereby ensuring that regardless of the choice you make, you're investing in utility and excellence.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Peugeot Partner is a bit cheaper – starting at 22,400 £ , while the Renault Kangoo costs 25,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3,325 £.
Both cars consume an average of 5.2 L/100km – no difference here.
In terms of energy consumption, the Peugeot Partner is slightly more efficient: consuming 17.4 kWh/100km compared to 20.2 kWh/100km for the Renault Kangoo. That’s a difference of about 2.8 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Peugeot Partner offers slightly more range – reaching up to 354 km, about 69 km more than the Renault Kangoo.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Peugeot Partner offers marginally more power – delivering 136 HP compared to 130 HP. That’s roughly 6 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Peugeot Partner is barely quicker – completing the sprint in 11.2 s, while the Renault Kangoo takes 11.6 s. That’s about 0.4 s quicker.
Looking at top speed, the Peugeot Partner is noticeably faster – reaching 183 km/h, while the Renault Kangoo tops out at 135 km/h. The difference is around 48 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Peugeot Partner delivers barely more torque with 300 Nm compared to 270 Nm. That’s about 30 Nm more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Seats: Renault Kangoo offers more seats – 7 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Peugeot Partner is somewhat lighter – 1,329 kg compared to 1,489 kg. The difference is around 160 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Peugeot Partner offers substantially more boot space – 1,800 L compared to 950 L. That’s a difference of about 850 L.
For maximum load capacity, the Peugeot Partner offers visibly more capacity – up to 4,000 L, about 950 L more than the Renault Kangoo.
When it comes to payload, the Peugeot Partner carries markedly more – 991 kg compared to 610 kg. That’s a difference of about 381 kg.
The Peugeot Partner is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Peugeot Partner is a no-nonsense workhorse that doubles as a surprisingly comfy family mover, combining clever storage solutions with an easy-to-live-in cabin. It won’t win any beauty contests, but for small businesses and active families it’s practical, economical and utterly reliable when the day gets busy.
details
The Renault Kangoo is the pragmatic chameleon of small vans, marrying van-like practicality with carlike comfort and a cheerful, friendly face that suits both family runs and workday hauls. It's sensible, versatile and annoyingly useful — easy to live with, cheap to run and clever where it counts, so you get more space and fewer compromises than the price suggests.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
22,400 - 33,800 £
|
Price
25,700 - 36,200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.2 - 6.3 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.2 - 7.4 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.4 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
20.2 - 21.5 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
354 km
|
Electric Range
278 - 285 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 143 g/km
|
co2
0 - 168 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
53 - 61 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
Body Type
High Roof Estate
|
|
Seats
2 - 5
|
Seats
5 - 7
|
|
Doors
4 - 5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,329 - 1,813 kg
|
Curb weight
1,489 - 2,041 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
1,800 L
|
Trunk capacity
500 - 950 L
|
|
Length
4,403 - 4,753 mm
|
Length
4,486 - 4,911 mm
|
|
Width
1,848 mm
|
Width
1,860 - 1,919 mm
|
|
Height
1,796 - 1,812 mm
|
Height
1,838 - 1,869 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
3,300 - 4,000 L
|
Max trunk capacity
2,500 - 3,050 L
|
|
Payload
611 - 991 kg
|
Payload
459 - 610 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Diesel, Petrol
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol, Diesel
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
102 - 136 HP
|
Power HP
95 - 130 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.6 - 16.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
135 - 183 km/h
|
Max Speed
130 - 135 km/h
|
|
Torque
205 - 300 Nm
|
Torque
240 - 270 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
75 - 100 kW
|
Power kW
70 - 96 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,499 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,332 - 1,461 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
Model Year
2,022 - 2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, F, E
|
|
Brand
Peugeot
|
Brand
Renault
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España