Compare performance (131 HP vs 130 HP), boot space and price (22,400 £ vs 25,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes Citan or Renault Kangoo?
In the world of high roof wagons, vehicles often share design elements and features, yet possess unique characteristics that set them apart. This is especially true when comparing the Mercedes Citan and the Renault Kangoo. As both models cater to a similar audience, their offerings in terms of performance, efficiency, and comfort are intriguing to compare.
The Mercedes Citan comes with versatile engine options. From petrol and diesel to electric, it covers a broad spectrum. Notably, the electric version provides a range between 265 and 280 km on a 45 kWh battery, offering an eco-friendly option to enthusiasts. The power outputs for the Citan range from 95 to 131 HP, promising promising acceleration and agility in city driving.
On the other hand, the Renault Kangoo delivers similar versatility with its petrol, diesel, and electric variants. Its electric model edges out slightly with a range of up to 285 km. The power range of the Kangoo stands at 95 to 130 HP, comparable to the Citan but with a slight advantage in higher power configurations.
Both vehicles offer manual and dual-clutch automatic transmission options, making them adaptable to varied driving preferences. These front-wheel-drive vehicles are designed to handle urban environments efficiently, offering smooth rides irrespective of driving conditions.
When discussing interior space, both the Citan and Kangoo provide practical solutions. The Mercedes Citan offers a trunk capacity of up to 551 liters, sufficient for most family and business needs. Seating capacity is fixed at five, ensuring comfortable accommodation for all occupants.
In comparison, the Renault Kangoo demonstrates versatility with seating options for five or seven passengers, depending on the configuration. The trunk offers generous storage space, with capacities reaching 950 liters in some variants—ideal for cargo-heavy trips.
Fuel consumption figures of both cars are competitive. The Citan's consumption ranges from 5.3 to 7.1 L/100 km for its different engine types, whereas its electric model consumes between 19.3 and 20.7 kWh/100 km. CO2 emissions align with efficiency classes from A to F, depending on the model.
The Renault Kangoo mirrors these efficiency classes with a similar fuel consumption range of 5.2 to 7.1 L/100 km. Its electric consumption is slightly higher, at 20.2 to 21.5 kWh/100 km, but remains competitive with a CO2 efficiency class ranging up to A for selective models.
Design-wise, both vehicles boast comparable dimensions, making them suitable for urban and suburban environments. The Mercedes Citan's length and width stand at 4498 mm and 1859 mm respectively, with height options reaching up to 1830 mm. The Renault Kangoo is slightly shorter in length at 4486 mm, with a bit more height at up to 1869 mm, offering a more imposing presence on the road.
Choosing between the Mercedes Citan and Renault Kangoo can be challenging as both offer exceptional value, performance, and efficiency. The Citan might attract those seeking a prestigious badge with slightly better urban maneuverability, whereas the Kangoo’s strengths lie in its cargo capacity and passenger flexibility.
Ultimately, deciding between these two well-rounded vehicles will depend heavily on individual priorities – be it brand loyalty, feature preferences, or specific use-case needs.
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Mercedes Citan is slightly cheaper – starting at 22,400 £ , while the Renault Kangoo costs 25,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3,271 £.
Both cars consume an average of 5.2 L/100km – no difference here.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes Citan offers only slightly more power – delivering 131 HP compared to 130 HP. That’s roughly 1 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Renault Kangoo is a bit quicker – completing the sprint in 11.6 s, while the Mercedes Citan takes 13 s. That’s about 1.4 s quicker.
Both models offer the same torque – 270 Nm.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Renault Kangoo offers more seats – 7 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Renault Kangoo is marginally lighter – 1,489 kg compared to 1,556 kg. The difference is around 67 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Renault Kangoo offers visibly more boot space – 775 L compared to 551 L. That’s a difference of about 224 L.
When it comes to payload, the Mercedes Citan carries marginally more – 644 kg compared to 610 kg. That’s a difference of about 34 kg.
The Mercedes Citan holds a solid overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Mercedes Citan is a clever urban van that dresses sensible practicality in a surprisingly premium suit, making light work of deliveries and family duties without feeling like a workhorse. With a calm, car-like driving feel, clever interior packaging and the Mercedes badge up front, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want function with a touch of luxury and a wink of personality.
details
The Renault Kangoo is the pragmatic chameleon of small vans, marrying van-like practicality with carlike comfort and a cheerful, friendly face that suits both family runs and workday hauls. It's sensible, versatile and annoyingly useful — easy to live with, cheap to run and clever where it counts, so you get more space and fewer compromises than the price suggests.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
22,400 - 30,100 £
|
Price
25,700 - 32,100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.2 - 7.4 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.2 - 7.4 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
19.3 - 20.7 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
265 - 280 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
45 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 167 g/km
|
co2
136 - 168 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
54 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
High Roof Estate
|
Body Type
High Roof Estate
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5 - 7
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,556 - 2,010 kg
|
Curb weight
1,489 - 1,830 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
0 - 551 L
|
Trunk capacity
500 - 775 L
|
|
Length
4,498 - 4,922 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,859 mm
|
Width
1,860 mm
|
|
Height
1,811 - 1,830 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,979 - 3,660 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
485 - 644 kg
|
Payload
459 - 610 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel, Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
95 - 131 HP
|
Power HP
95 - 130 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
13 - 15.5 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.6 - 16.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
132 - 183 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
200 - 270 Nm
|
Torque
240 - 270 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
70 - 96 kW
|
Power kW
70 - 96 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,332 - 1,461 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,332 - 1,461 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,021 - 2,024
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, E, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, E
|
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
Brand
Renault
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España