Compare performance (180 HP vs 170 HP), boot space and price (30,900 £ vs 43,500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Fiat Scudo or Nissan Primastar Transporter?
In the world of cargo vans, efficiency, reliability, and innovation are the key benchmarks to evaluate the best among the best. Today, we delve into the specifications and features of two popular contenders: the Fiat Scudo and the Nissan Primastar Transporter. Both are renowned for their reliability and utility, but how do they measure up against each other?
The Fiat Scudo offers an intriguing choice between diesel and electric engine options. With power outputs ranging from 100 to 180 HP in diesel and up to 177 HP in electric variants, the Scudo caters to both traditional and eco-conscious drivers. Offering a front-wheel-drive system with a choice of manual or automatic transmissions ensures flexibility for different driving preferences. Diesel models boast an engine capacity of either 1500 cm3 or 2000 cm3, delivering a balanced torque range from 260 to 400 Nm, enhancing the vehicle's ability to handle hefty payloads smoothly.
The Nissan Primastar Transporter, on the other hand, sticks to a more conventional diesel-only approach. It provides options from 110 to 170 HP, with a robust engine capacity of 1997 cm3. Like the Scudo, it also features a front-wheel-drive configuration, and buyers can choose between a manual gearbox or a dual-clutch automatic transmission. The torque band ranges from 300 to 380 Nm, suggesting a strong driving performance across its engine range.
When it comes to fuel efficiency, the Fiat Scudo is impressive, with diesel models consuming between 6.5 to 7.8 L/100 km. The electric variant, with a consumption of 23.6 to 27 kWh/100 km, can reach an electric range of up to 352 km. The diversity in powertrains significantly boosts its appeal to a broader audience seeking greener alternatives.
The Nissan Primastar Transporter offers diesel consumption rates between 6.7 and 7.9 L/100 km, which, while commendable, do not reach beyond what its rival provides. However, the Primastar compensates with an impressive fuel tank capacity of 80 liters, allowing longer periods between refueling, which could be advantageous for long-haul transit.
Space and capacity are crucial factors for any transporter van. The Fiat Scudo provides multiple configurations with lengths ranging from 4609 to 5309 mm, widths of 1920 mm, and height varying between 1881 and 1935 mm. The payload capacity is equally variable, stretching up to an impressive 1333 kg, catering to diverse logisticians’ needs.
Conversely, the Nissan Primastar Transporter is slightly larger with lengths of 5080 to 5480 mm, width of 1956 mm, and heights from 1971 to 2486 mm, making it a preferable choice for those requiring extra space. The payload capacity ranges up to 1173 kg, slightly less than the Scudo but still highly effective for sizable loads.
Both vans offer versatile seating arrangements. The Fiat Scudo can accommodate between 2 to 6 seats, making it highly adaptable for both cargo and crews. The Nissan Primastar offers similar flexibility, seating 3 to 6 occupants, ensuring ride comfort and practicality.
The Fiat Scudo and the Nissan Primastar Transporter excel in unique ways. The Scudo's emphasis on innovation, especially with its electric options, presents a forward-thinking choice, whereas Primastar's commendable diesel engines and impressive tank capacity make it a solid workhorse for traditional users. Your ultimate decision will hinge on whether you prioritize cutting-edge efficiency or tried-and-true practicality in your transport needs.
Both vehicles stand as fixtures in the cargo van segment, each catering to the specific demands of commercial utility with finesse and reliability.
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Fiat Scudo is significantly cheaper – starting at 30,900 £ , while the Nissan Primastar Transporter costs 43,500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 12,617 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Fiat Scudo uses 6.2 L/100km and is only slightly more efficient than the Nissan Primastar Transporter with 6.8 L/100km. The difference is about 0.6 L/100km.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Fiat Scudo offers only slightly more power – delivering 180 HP compared to 170 HP. That’s roughly 10 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Fiat Scudo delivers marginally more torque with 400 Nm compared to 380 Nm. That’s about 20 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 6 people.
In terms of curb weight, Fiat Scudo is a bit lighter – 1,722 kg compared to 1,926 kg. The difference is around 204 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Fiat Scudo carries noticeably more – 1,805 kg compared to 1,110 kg. That’s a difference of about 695 kg.
The Fiat Scudo is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Fiat Scudo is a practical and unpretentious van that balances hardworking utility with a surprisingly polished cabin, making it a sensible choice for tradespeople and families who need space without fuss. It doesn't pretend to be flashy, but its clever packaging, sensible driving manners and affordable running costs make the Scudo a dependable partner for the daily grind and weekend projects — and it even manages to look tidy in the car park.
details
The Nissan Primastar is a no-nonsense transporter that pairs rugged practicality with a surprisingly civilized cabin, so you arrive with your tools — and your temper — intact. It may not steal glances at the lights, but its sensible layout and dependable nature make it the kind of van you’ll happily rely on day in, day out.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
30,900 - 51,300 £
|
Price
43,500 - 48,500 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
6.2 - 6.5 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
6.8 - 7 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
23.6 - 24 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
221 - 352 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 172 g/km
|
co2
178 - 184 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
|
Seats
2 - 6
|
Seats
3 - 6
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,722 - 2,260 kg
|
Curb weight
1,926 - 2,075 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,920 mm
|
Width
1,956 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
840 - 1,805 kg
|
Payload
899 - 1,110 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Diesel
|
Engine Type
Diesel
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
120 - 180 HP
|
Power HP
150 - 170 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.5 - 11.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
260 - 400 Nm
|
Torque
350 - 380 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
88 - 132 kW
|
Power kW
110 - 125 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,499 - 2,184 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,997 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, F
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
|
|
Brand
Fiat
|
Brand
Nissan
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España