VS

Ford Mustang Convertible vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque comparison

Compare performance (446 HP vs 269 HP), boot space and price (56,900 £ vs 43,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Mustang Convertible or Land Rover Range Rover Evoque?

Ford Mustang Convertible vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque: Key differences

Ford Mustang Convertible

  • markedly more power
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque

1.4 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • noticeably cheaper
  • significantly more efficient
  • only slightly lighter
details

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Mustang Convertible

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is noticeably cheaper – starting at 43,300 £ , while the Ford Mustang Convertible costs 56,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 13,629 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque uses 3.7 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Ford Mustang Convertible with 12.3 L/100km. The difference is about 8.6 L/100km.

Range Rover Evoque

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Mustang Convertible offers markedly more power – delivering 446 HP compared to 269 HP. That’s roughly 177 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Mustang Convertible is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 5 s, while the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque takes 7.2 s. That’s about 2.2 s quicker.

Both models offer the same torque – 540 Nm.

Mustang Convertible

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: Land Rover Range Rover Evoque offers more seats – 5 vs 4.

In terms of curb weight, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is only slightly lighter – 1,792 kg compared to 1,876 kg. The difference is around 84 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque carries considerably more – 600 kg compared to 324 kg. That’s a difference of about 276 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £43,300
Range Rover Evoque

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 160 - 269 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 3.7 - 7.8 L/100km
  • Electric Range 67 km
Ford Mustang Convertible
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Ford Mustang Convertible

The Ford Mustang Convertible makes every drive feel like a small celebration, its exhaust note and open-air drama turning mundane routes into showstoppers. It’s a car that doubles as a weekend mood lifter and a credible everyday companion, blending swagger with surprising practicality.

details

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque

The Range Rover Evoque turns heads with a compact, sculpted silhouette and an interior that feels more boutique hotel than utility vehicle. It delivers composed, playful handling around town while keeping enough ruggedness for weekend escapes — perfect for buyers who want luxury without the ostentation.

details
Ford Mustang Convertible
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque

Costs and Consumption

Price
56,900 - 59,900 £
Price
43,300 - 64,800 £
Consumption L/100km
12.3 - 12.4 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
3.7 - 7.8 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
67 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
280 - 282 g/km
co2
85 - 177 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Convertible
Body Type
SUV
Seats
4
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,876 kg
Curb weight
1,792 - 2,157 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
472 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,916 mm
Width
1,900 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
319 - 324 kg
Payload
503 - 600 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
446 HP
Power HP
160 - 269 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5 - 5.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.2 - 10.3 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
540 Nm
Torque
260 - 540 Nm
Number of Cylinders
8
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
328 kW
Power kW
118 - 198 kW
Engine capacity
5,038 cm3
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,998 cm3

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, F, B
Brand
Ford
Brand
Land Rover
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.