@ Volvo Cars
@ Jaguar Land Rover Media
VS

Volvo XC60 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque – Which car suits you better?

Two cars, one duel: Volvo XC60 meets Land Rover Range Rover Evoque.
Which one wins in performance, efficiency and value for money? Find out now!

XC60 @ Volvo Cars

The Battle of the Compact Luxury SUVs: Volvo XC60 vs. Range Rover Evoque

The luxury SUV market has seen an explosion of models vying for attention with a blend of style, performance, and technology. Today, we dive into two quintessential models representing the segment: the newly refreshed Volvo XC60 and the ever-stylish Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. Both vehicles offer a compelling mix of cutting-edge innovations and robust driving dynamics, but how do they stack up against each other?

Range Rover Evoque @ Jaguar Land Rover Media

Power and Performance: Vigor Meets Versatility

The Volvo XC60 comes in a selection of engine configurations, including Petrol MHEV and Plug-in Hybrid, providing a powerful thrust of up to 455 HP and torque reaching an impressive 709 Nm. The XC60 offers a sporty three-variant acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h ranging from 6.9 seconds to a scintillating 4.9 seconds. The all-wheel drive coupled with an automatic gearbox ensures that drivers experience silky-smooth transitions and steadfast traction in all conditions.

On the other hand, the Range Rover Evoque offers an equally eclectic mix of Diesel and Petrol MHEV alongside a Plug-in Hybrid option, boasting power outputs that peak at 269 HP with 540 Nm torque. Though somewhat varied, the Evoque's acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h falls between 10.3 seconds for the more subdued models and 7.2 seconds for the more aggressive setups. The Evoque provides both all-wheel drive and front-wheel drive options, catering to varied driving needs.

XC60 @ Volvo Cars

Efficiency and Range: Driving Farther with Less Fuel

Volvo's emphasis on eco-friendliness shines through with their Plug-in Hybrid offering, achieving a remarkable 0.9 L/100km in fuel consumption with an electric range of up to 80 km. A sizable 14.7 kWh battery supports this extended electric range, underscoring Volvo's commitment to sustainable luxury.

Meanwhile, the Evoque doesn't lag far behind, with its plug-in hybrid version consuming just 1.4 L/100km. Its electric range may not be as extensive as the XC60's, reaching 68 km with an 11.5 kWh battery, yet it remains a valiant contender in the quest for lower emissions and higher fuel efficiency.

Range Rover Evoque @ Jaguar Land Rover Media

Dimensions and Practicality: Space Meets Style

The Volvo XC60 stands at 4688 mm in length, offering an abundance of trunk space with a capacity of up to 483 liters, subtly boasting practicality alongside its sleek design. Its interior space embraces passengers with luxurious and ergonomic seating, ensuring comfort on long drives.

The Range Rover Evoque, slightly shorter at 4371 mm, fiercely competes with its Volvo counterpart, possessing a trunk capacity of 472 liters. Although slightly less spacious, it assures potential buyers with its promise of high-quality materials and a sophisticated, tech-laden cabin.

XC60 @ Volvo Cars

Technical Innovations: A Showcase of Modern Engineering

Volvo's XC60 is stuffed to the brim with cutting-edge tech, including advanced autonomous driving aids and an intuitive infotainment system that seamlessly integrates with drivers’ smartphones. Volvo's focus on safety and driver support is seen in its advanced sensor suite, providing peace of mind for passengers and drivers alike.

The Range Rover Evoque dazzles with its own suite of technological marvels, from premium connectivity solutions to innovative all-terrain driving systems that safely tackle various geographies. Known for its capability, the Evoque ensures that technology serves both function and luxury.

Range Rover Evoque @ Jaguar Land Rover Media

Conclusion: Choosing Your Champion

Choosing between the Volvo XC60 and Range Rover Evoque ultimately depends on what you value most. The XC60, with its bold emphasis on efficiency and a sleek modern interior, appeals particularly to those who prioritize eco-conscious performance and cutting-edge tech. The Evoque, with its head-turning design and unmatched off-road capabilities, may find favor with those who value versatility and style.

Both SUVs represent the pinnacle of luxury and performance in their own right, leaving discerning buyers spoilt for choice.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

XC60 @ Volvo Cars

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has a to a small extent advantage in terms of price – it starts at 43300 £, while the Volvo XC60 costs 49200 £. That’s a price difference of around 5906 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Volvo XC60 manages with 2.80 L and is therefore evident more efficient than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque with 3.70 L. The difference is about 0.90 L per 100 km.

As for range, the Volvo XC60 performs noticeable better – achieving up to 82 km, about 22 km more than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque.

Range Rover Evoque @ Jaguar Land Rover Media

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC60 has a convincingly edge – offering 455 HP compared to 269 HP. That’s roughly 186 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo XC60 is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.90 s, while the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque takes 7.20 s. That’s about 2.30 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque performs somewhat better – reaching 213 km/h, while the Volvo XC60 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 33 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Volvo XC60 pulls distinct stronger with 709 Nm compared to 540 Nm. That’s about 169 Nm difference.

XC60 @ Volvo Cars

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is slight lighter – 1792 kg compared to 1900 kg. The difference is around 108 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Volvo XC60 offers minimal more room – 483 L compared to 472 L. That’s a difference of about 11 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Volvo XC60 performs distinct better – up to 1543 L, which is about 387 L more than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque.

When it comes to payload, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque slight takes the win – 600 kg compared to 550 kg. That’s a difference of about 50 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Volvo XC60 shows itself to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £49,200
XC60 @ Volvo Cars

Volvo XC60

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 250 - 455 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 2.8 - 7.5 L
  • Electric Range : 74 - 82 km

Volvo XC60

5 (1)
rate

The Volvo XC60 blends Scandinavian calm with confident presence, offering a cabin that feels plush without shouting for attention. It’s a smart pick for buyers after a composed ride, clever practicality and thoughtful safety touches — it even makes running the family shuttle feel almost serene, which is a small miracle.

details

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque

1 (1)
rate

The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque combines refined luxury with robust off-road capabilities. Its sleek design and high-quality interior materials create an elegant yet comfortable driving experience. Advanced technology features and superior handling make it a versatile choice for both city and countryside adventures.

details
Volvo XC60
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
XC60 @ Volvo Cars
Range Rover Evoque @ Jaguar Land Rover Media

Costs and Consumption

Price
49200 - 75100 £
Price
43300 - 64800 £
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 7.5 L
Consumption L/100km
3.7 - 7.8 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
74 - 82 km
Electric Range
60 km
Battery Capacity
14.70 kWh
Battery Capacity
11.50 kWh
co2
64 - 169 g/km
co2
85 - 177 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
71 L
Fuel tank capacity
57 - 67 L

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1900 - 2150 kg
Curb weight
1792 - 2157 kg
Trunk capacity
468 - 483 L
Trunk capacity
472 L
Length
4708 mm
Length
4371 mm
Width
1902 mm
Width
1900 mm
Height
1651 - 1655 mm
Height
1649 mm
Max trunk capacity
1528 - 1543 L
Max trunk capacity
1156 L
Payload
510 - 550 kg
Payload
503 - 600 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
250 - 455 HP
Power HP
160 - 269 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 6.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.2 - 10.3 s
Max Speed
180 km/h
Max Speed
190 - 213 km/h
Torque
350 - 709 Nm
Torque
260 - 540 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
184 - 335 kW
Power kW
118 - 198 kW
Engine capacity
1969 cm3
Engine capacity
1498 - 1998 cm3

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, F, B
Brand
Volvo
Brand
Land Rover
What drive types are available for the Volvo XC60?

The Volvo XC60 is offered with All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.