Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Ford Mustang Mach-E vs NIO ET7 comparison
Compare performance (487 HP vs 653 HP), boot space and price (48,400 £ vs 59,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Mustang Mach-E or NIO ET7?
Ford Mustang Mach-E vs NIO ET7: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Mustang Mach-E
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Ford Mustang Mach-E is noticeably cheaper – starting at 48,400 £ , while the NIO ET7 costs 59,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 11,486 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Mustang Mach-E is barely more efficient: consuming 17.7 kWh/100km compared to 19 kWh/100km for the NIO ET7. That’s a difference of about 1.3 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers marginally more range – reaching up to 600 km, about 16 km more than the NIO ET7.
ET7
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the NIO ET7 offers noticeably more power – delivering 653 HP compared to 487 HP. That’s roughly 166 HP more horsepower.
Both models accelerate almost equally fast – 3.8 s from 0 to 100 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Mustang Mach-E delivers slightly more torque with 950 Nm compared to 850 Nm. That’s about 100 Nm more.
Mustang Mach-E
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Mustang Mach-E is slightly lighter – 2,161 kg compared to 2,434 kg. The difference is around 273 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers markedly more boot space – 519 L compared to 363 L. That’s a difference of about 156 L.
When it comes to payload, the NIO ET7 carries very slightly more – 466 kg compared to 450 kg. That’s a difference of about 16 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Mustang Mach-E shows a few small advantages in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £48,400
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Ford Mustang Mach-E
NIO ET7
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Mustang Mach-E
The Mustang Mach-E proves an electric SUV can be both playful and practical, with the Mustang name bringing muscle-car charisma to a family-friendly package. It delivers eager performance, a comfortable cabin, and a slick infotainment setup that keeps daily driving fun — and yes, you’ll still get admiring glances at the lights.
details
NIO ET7
The NIO ET7 arrives like a calm thunderstorm — sleek, silent and unapologetically clever, turning motorway cruising into the sort of effortless glide that makes other cars feel noisy and rehearsed. Inside, it's all luxury sofas and smart gadgets that actually help rather than confuse, so buyers who crave tech and comfort will feel like they've upgraded their life without needing to spellcheck the manual.
details
Ford Mustang Mach-E
NIO ET7
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
48,400 - 66,900 £
|
Price
59,900 - 68,900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.7 - 21 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
19 - 19.3 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
470 - 600 km
|
Electric Range
451 - 584 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
73.5 - 90 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Sedan
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
4
|
|
Curb weight
2,161 - 2,351 kg
|
Curb weight
2,434 - 2,454 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
519 L
|
Trunk capacity
363 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
5,101 mm
|
|
Width
1,881 mm
|
Width
1,987 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,509 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
368 - 450 kg
|
Payload
446 - 466 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
268 - 487 HP
|
Power HP
653 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 6.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
200 km/h
|
|
Torque
525 - 950 Nm
|
Torque
850 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
197 - 358 kW
|
Power kW
480 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2022
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
NIO
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.