VS

CUPRA Tavascan vs Ford Mustang Mach-E comparison

Compare performance (340 HP vs 487 HP), boot space and price (42,800 £ vs 48,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – CUPRA Tavascan or Ford Mustang Mach-E?

CUPRA Tavascan vs Ford Mustang Mach-E: Key differences

CUPRA Tavascan

4.5 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • slightly cheaper
  • a bit more efficient
  • very slightly lighter
  • very slightly more trunk space
details

Ford Mustang Mach-E

3.4 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • marginally more electric range
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Tavascan

Quick take: CUPRA Tavascan and Ford Mustang Mach-E

The CUPRA Tavascan and Ford Mustang Mach‑E represent two different takes on the electric SUV: sculpted, design‑forward refinement versus muscular, driver‑focused energy. CUPRA Tavascan VS Ford Mustang Mach-E frames the choice as style‑and‑comfort versus character‑and‑punch, and that contrast drives differences in comfort, practicality and everyday usability. This comparison translates reviewer consensus into the concrete trade‑offs you’ll feel on a commute, a family run or a long motorway day. Read on to see which temperament fits your priorities rather than chasing headline specs.

Mustang Mach-E

Character and driving feel

Driving the CUPRA Tavascan feels composed and measured: steering is precise and the setup tilts toward comfort with a sporty flavor when you ask for it. By contrast the Ford Mustang Mach‑E announces itself with stronger shove and a more direct steering response that flatters enthusiastic driving and quick overtakes. That means the Mach‑E rewards someone who enjoys dynamic responses and lively acceleration, while the Tavascan suits drivers who want a quieter, more controlled pace. In everyday terms, choose the Mach‑E for grin‑inducing moves and the Tavascan for confidence when the miles get long.

Tavascan

Comfort and long‑distance behavior

On long motorway days the CUPRA Tavascan impresses with low cabin noise and a settled ride that muffles fatigue better than the Mach‑E. The Ford Mustang Mach‑E can still hold high cruise speeds comfortably, but its firmer suspension and more tactile responses make it feel busier over rough surfaces. Practical travel rhythms differ too: the Tavascan’s efficiency tends to stretch real‑world range slightly further between stops, whereas the Mach‑E’s stronger performance and different charging behaviour create a travel pattern centred on shorter, quicker bursts. In short, the Tavascan feels like a relaxed grand tourer and the Mach‑E like a brisk weekend car that’s perfectly capable of long trips but demands a different driving rhythm.

Mustang Mach-E

Practicality and family use

If day‑to‑day usefulness matters, the CUPRA Tavascan delivers a generous, well‑shaped boot and a payload that makes loading easier for family gear. The Ford Mustang Mach‑E counters with a useful frunk and a flatter floor that makes the rear bench more comfortable for three across and simplifies child‑seat installation. However, the Tavascan’s coupé roofline trims rear headroom, so taller passengers will prefer the Mach‑E’s roomier upper cabin. Maneuvering in town also differs: the Tavascan’s lighter steering and tighter turning feel better in tight parking, while the wider Mach‑E asks for more space but rewards with easier ingress and clearer loading layouts up front.

Tavascan

Cabin feel, infotainment and perceived quality

Inside the CUPRA Tavascan the cabin is theatrically arranged with bold surfaces and generally higher perceived quality, though some controls rely on haptics that can be fiddly in daily use. The Ford Mustang Mach‑E offers a cleaner, functional cockpit and a capable infotainment system, but material finishes and certain menu flows feel less premium and can demand attention while driving. Both cars suffer from restricted rear visibility because of strong styling choices, yet the Tavascan’s coupé profile makes that sensation more pronounced. If tactile controls and a staged interior matter, the Tavascan usually nudges ahead; if straightforward layouts and useful software features are your priority, the Mach‑E may suit you better.

Mustang Mach-E

Buyer fit: who should pick which car

Choose the CUPRA Tavascan if you prioritise highway serenity, a statement cabin and a capacious, well‑shaped boot that suits family life and long commutes. Opt for the Ford Mustang Mach‑E if you want brisk acceleration, a flatter rear floor and extra front storage that make city life and spirited driving more satisfying. Both cars trade off charging behaviour, ride philosophy and interior ergonomics—so your decision should hinge on whether you value calm, efficient long‑distance cruising (Tavascan) or punchy responses, rear practicality and a more driver‑centric feel (Mach‑E). Below we break down the technical specifics that create these real‑world differences so you can match range, charging and performance numbers to the practical conclusions above.

Frequently compared as well

Ford Capri
Ford Mustang Mach-E
VS
The Ford Capri and the Ford Mustang Mach-E represent two very different takes on driving pleasure—one a classic sporty coupe with nostalgic charm, the other a modern all-electric crossover with high-tech performance. This comparison will help you weigh classic style and driving feel against …
CUPRA Tavascan
CUPRA Terramar
VS
The Cupra Tavascan is Cupra’s all-electric crossover, offering sleek styling and EV-focused tech, while the Cupra Terramar targets buyers who prefer a compact, performance-oriented SUV with a conventional powertrain. This comparison cuts through driving character, practicality, equipment and …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Tavascan

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

CUPRA Tavascan is slightly cheaper – starting at 42,800 £ , while the Ford Mustang Mach-E costs 48,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5,657 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the CUPRA Tavascan is a bit more efficient: consuming 15.4 kWh/100km compared to 17.7 kWh/100km for the Ford Mustang Mach-E. That’s a difference of about 2.3 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers marginally more range – reaching up to 600 km, about 43 km more than the CUPRA Tavascan.

Mustang Mach-E

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers clearly more power – delivering 487 HP compared to 340 HP. That’s roughly 147 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Mustang Mach-E is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.8 s, while the CUPRA Tavascan takes 5.5 s. That’s about 1.7 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Mustang Mach-E delivers clearly more torque with 950 Nm compared to 545 Nm. That’s about 405 Nm more.

Tavascan

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, CUPRA Tavascan is very slightly lighter – 2,096 kg compared to 2,161 kg. The difference is around 65 kg.

Looking at boot space, the CUPRA Tavascan offers very slightly more boot space – 540 L compared to 519 L. That’s a difference of about 21 L.

When it comes to payload, the CUPRA Tavascan carries moderately more – 518 kg compared to 450 kg. That’s a difference of about 68 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Mustang Mach-E is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £48,400
Mustang Mach-E

Ford Mustang Mach-E

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 268 - 487 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 17.7 - 21 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 470 - 600 km
details
CUPRA Tavascan
Ford Mustang Mach-E

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

CUPRA Tavascan

The Cupra Tavascan blends athletic styling with a premium, driver-focused cabin, giving the electric crossover a distinctly sporty character. It feels poised and engaging on the road while standing out with bold design cues and a modern, high-quality finish.

details
89C3E534-A830-42FA-86CC-BA89F47CCA5A
E1499BC5-9624-4D31-A93B-93D1887B3824
2C084747-FC5E-41F7-84AE-11FE7F54C046

Reviews CUPRA Tavascan

4.5 (3 Reviews)
rate
David
25 Apr 2026, 10:57:49

Both are very good. The range and energy consumption is beter in the cupra. The cupra is also more responsive and it handles beter. The Kia is more spacious and slightly beter tech wise. The Kia is more a family car.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Ford Mustang Mach-E

The Mustang Mach-E proves an electric SUV can be both playful and practical, with the Mustang name bringing muscle-car charisma to a family-friendly package. It delivers eager performance, a comfortable cabin, and a slick infotainment setup that keeps daily driving fun — and yes, you’ll still get admiring glances at the lights.

details
2020_FORD_MACH-E_AWD_23-LOW
2020_FORD_MACH-E_AWD_19-LOW
2020_FORD_MACH-E_AWD_24-LOW
2020_FORD_MACH-E_AWD_05-LOW
2020_FORD_MACH-E_AWD_09-LOW

Reviews Ford Mustang Mach-E

3.4 (3 Reviews)
rate
Roel
10 Jun 2026, 04:25:36

Incredibly beautiful SUV. The most beautiful one out there in terms of style.
The interior could be a bit more modern... but the seats feel amazing.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Yvo Trimbos
15 Mar 2026, 19:07:15

Lovely car with sporty handling and fantastic seats.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
M
7 Dec 2025, 19:35:44

Rubbish car.

Features clearly not as polished as other EV SUVs at similar prices (e.g. Volvo EX40 / BYD Sealion 7))

Alarms about driver fatigues every 10 minutes.

Monika
6 Nov 2025, 16:28:23

Well-built car, reasonably priced — unlike the inflated costs of German cars.

Frequently compared as well

CUPRA Tavascan
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The CUPRA Tavascan storms into the compact crossover arena as an electric firebrand with sharp looks and sporty intent, while the Toyota C-HR+ plays the clever, comfort-first contrarian with hybrid thrift and quirky flair. Which one earns your driveway space — the bold, battery-powered Tavascan or …
CUPRA Tavascan
CUPRA Raval
VS
Choosing between the CUPRA Tavascan and the CUPRA Raval means weighing two different takes on style, technology and driving character from the same performance-focused brand. This comparison will cover driving dynamics, range and charging, interior practicality, and overall value so you can pick …
Ford Explorer EV
Ford Mustang Mach-E
VS
The Ford Explorer EV swaps the Mustang Mach‑E’s athletic poise for SUV practicality, three-row space and a taller stance — ideal if you need family duties, towing and sensible range without sacrificing slick tech. But if you crave sharper handling, a sportier silhouette and a more emotional drive, …
CUPRA Tavascan
VW ID.4
VS
The Cupra Tavascan and the VW ID.4 are closely related electric SUVs that take different approaches: the Tavascan leans into sharper styling and a sportier driving character, while the ID.4 prioritises practicality, comfort and broad everyday appeal. If you want dynamic design and a more engaging …
CUPRA Tavascan
Mazda CX-6e
VS
The CUPRA Tavascan and Mazda CX-6e offer distinct approaches to the electric crossover: the Tavascan leans into sporty performance and bold styling, while the CX-6e prioritizes Mazda’s refined design and everyday usability. This comparison focuses on driving dynamics, range and practicality to help …
CUPRA Formentor
CUPRA Tavascan
VS
The CUPRA Formentor and Tavascan take different approaches to sporty, premium compact SUVs: the Formentor mixes sharp handling with combustion and hybrid powertrains, while the Tavascan is CUPRA’s fully electric, design‑forward coupe‑SUV. This quick comparison will help you choose between the …
CUPRA Born
CUPRA Tavascan
VS
Deciding between the CUPRA Born and the CUPRA Tavascan comes down to whether you want a compact, sporty EV for everyday city driving or a larger, more SUV‑like electric vehicle with extra space and presence. The Born delivers lively handling, efficient range and hatchback practicality, while the …
CUPRA Tavascan
Skoda Elroq
VS
Choosing between the Cupra Tavascan and the Skoda Elroq is mostly a question of whether you want a sportier, design-led electric SUV or a more practical, value-focused one. This comparison cuts through the marketing to focus on driving dynamics, range, interior space, technology and running costs …
CUPRA Tavascan
Ford Mustang Mach-E

Costs and Consumption
Price
42,800 - 50,500 £
Price
48,400 - 66,900 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
15.4 - 17.1 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
17.7 - 21 kWh/100km
Electric Range
441 - 557 km
Electric Range
470 - 600 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,096 - 2,273 kg
Curb weight
2,161 - 2,351 kg
Trunk capacity
540 L
Trunk capacity
519 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,861 mm
Width
1,881 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
507 - 518 kg
Payload
368 - 450 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
190 - 340 HP
Power HP
268 - 487 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.5 - 8.6 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 6.2 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
350 - 545 Nm
Torque
525 - 950 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
140 - 250 kW
Power kW
197 - 358 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
CUPRA
Brand
Ford
What drive types are available for the CUPRA Tavascan?

The CUPRA Tavascan is offered with Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.