CUPRA VS Ford

VS

In a thrilling showdown between the CUPRA Tavascan and the Ford Mustang Mach-E, both electric SUVs bring their own unique flair to the table. The Tavascan impresses with its striking design and sporty performance, making it a compelling choice for those seeking an exhilarating driving experience. Meanwhile, the Mustang Mach-E stands out with its impressive range and advanced technology features, appealing to those who prioritize practicality alongside power.

CUPRA

details

Ford

details

The automotive market is evolving rapidly, driven by innovation and a growing demand for electric vehicles. In this context, we pit two exciting contenders against each other: the CUPRA Tavascan and the Ford Mustang Mach-E. Both are electric SUVs that promise thrilling performance and cutting-edge technology, but how do they truly compare? Let’s delve into their specifications and features.

Design and Dimensions

Both the CUPRA Tavascan and the Ford Mustang Mach-E exude a sporty vibe with modern aesthetics, but their design philosophies differ slightly. The Tavascan measures 4644 mm in length, 1861 mm in width, and 1597 mm in height. It features the distinctive CUPRA design language with sharp lines and an aggressive stance.

On the other hand, the Mustang Mach-E is a bit larger, with lengths ranging from 4713 mm to 4750 mm, and width from 1881 mm to 1882 mm. Its silhouette pays homage to the legendary Mustang while adding a contemporary touch befitting an SUV. The taller profile of the Mach-E, at heights between 1613 mm and 1648 mm, gives it a more commanding presence on the road.

Powertrains and Performance

Equipped with impressive electric powertrains, the CUPRA Tavascan boasts two variants: a 286 HP (210 kW) version and a more powerful 340 HP (250 kW) model. It provides exhilarating acceleration, achieving 0-100 km/h in just 6.8 seconds to 5.5 seconds, depending on the variant. The Tavascan supports both rear-wheel and all-wheel drive configurations and features a torque output ranging between 545 Nm and 679 Nm.

The Ford Mustang Mach-E offers a diverse power range across various trims, starting from 269 HP to an astonishing 487 HP in the GT variant. Acceleration times also impress, with the fastest model recording 0-100 km/h in just 3.5 seconds. The Mach-E provides multiple drive configurations as well, with torque ranging from 430 Nm up to a massive 880 Nm, which ensures that it delivers thrilling performance regardless of the variant.

Electric Range and Efficiency

Range anxiety is a key concern for many prospective EV buyers. The CUPRA Tavascan offers an electric range of up to 569 km, allowing for long journeys without frequent charging stops. In terms of efficiency, it consumes between 15.1 kWh/100km to 16.5 kWh/100km, making it a cost-effective option for electric driving.

In comparison, the Ford Mustang Mach-E boasts an impressive electric range of up to 600 km in its most efficient configuration, ensuring it stays competitive. It consumes more energy, ranging from 17.3 kWh/100km to 21.3 kWh/100km, depending on the variant. While both vehicles are environmentally friendly, the Tavascan slightly edges ahead in efficiency.

Interior and Technology

Inside, the CUPRA Tavascan provides a modern and driver-focused environment, equipped with a plethora of digital displays and premium materials. It seats five comfortably and offers a significant trunk capacity of 540 liters, making it practical for families or active lifestyles.

The Mustang Mach-E, while similarly offering seating for five, focuses heavily on a tech-centric experience. Its interior features Ford's latest SYNC technology, providing seamless integration with smartphones and navigation systems. However, trunk capacity is slightly smaller at 402 liters, potentially limiting cargo space for users who prioritize storage.

Conclusion: Which SUV Reigns Supreme?

In the battle of electric SUVs, the CUPRA Tavascan and Ford Mustang Mach-E both stand out with their unique offerings. The Tavascan excels in efficiency and trunk space, delivering strong performance with a sporty design. The Mustang Mach-E, on the other hand, caters to a broader range of powertrains and offers remarkable range capabilities, alongside an advanced tech-laden interior.

Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on personal preferences and priorities in features, performance, and design. Regardless of your selection, both models represent a bright future for electric mobility, packed with innovations that are set to redefine the driving experience.

CUPRA
Ford

Costs and Consumption

Price
about 45600 - 52100 £
Price
about 47800 - 68800 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
15.1 - 16.5 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
17.3 - 21.3 kWh
Electric Range
521 - 569 km
Electric Range
435 - 600 km
Battery Capacity
77 kWh
Battery Capacity
72.6 - 91 kWh
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
2178 - 2273 kg
Curb weight
2160 - 2348 kg
Trunk capacity
540 L
Trunk capacity
402 L
Length
4644 mm
Length
4713 - 4750 mm
Width
1861 mm
Width
1881 - 1882 mm
Height
1597 mm
Height
1613 - 1648 mm
Payload
507 - 522 kg
Payload
369 - 445 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
286 - 340 HP
Power HP
269 - 487 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.5 - 6.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.5 - 7.3 s
Max Speed
180 km/h
Max Speed
180 - 200 km/h
Torque
545 - 679 Nm
Torque
430 - 880 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
210 - 250 kW
Power kW
198 - 358 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-
Top speed
180 km/h
Top speed
180 - 200 km/h

General

Model Year
2024
Model Year
2022 - 2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
CUPRA
Brand
Ford

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.