Everyday use, family trips or long-distance drives – here’s where the differences show.
Discover whether CUPRA Tavascan or Ford Explorer EV fits your lifestyle better.
The SUV market is rapidly electrifying, and two standout contenders are making waves with their innovative designs and electrifying performance. We delve into a head-to-head comparison of the 2024 CUPRA Tavascan and the Ford Explorer EV, examining their technical aspects and innovations that set them apart.
Both the CUPRA Tavascan and Ford Explorer EV are powered by electric engines, offering multiple power variants for versatility. The Tavascan provides an impressive power output ranging from 286 to 340 HP, with corresponding torque figures of 545 to 679 Nm. It sprints from 0 to 100 km/h in just 5.5 seconds with the top trim, ensuring an exhilarating drive experience.
The Explorer EV matches this with a similar power output range, delivering 286 to 340 HP, and a slightly lower torque range at 310 to 679 Nm. The Explorer EV accelerates from 0 to 100 km/h in 5.3 seconds with its top variant, providing a slightly quicker launch than its competitor.
Battery capacity and range are crucial factors for electric vehicles. Both models sport sizeable battery packs, with the Tavascan housing a 77 kWh battery, yielding an electric range between 521 to 569 km. This efficiency empowers longer journeys with fewer recharges.
In contrast, the Explorer EV offers flexibility with multiple battery options, including a 77 kWh variant yielding an impressive 602 km range, surpassing the Tavascan. Other battery configurations like the 79 and 52 kWh offer diverse range options, adding versatility tailored to different driving needs.
Both SUVs exhibit contemporary designs tailored for urban and rugged terrains alike. The Tavascan's sleek design measures 4644 mm in length, 1861 mm in width, and stands at 1597 mm high. It maintains a low curb weight ranging from 2178 to 2273 kg, maximizing efficiency.
The Explorer EV is slightly more compact at 4468 mm in length and 1871 mm in width, with a height varying from 1630 to 1639 mm. Its curb weight is lighter, between 2090 and 2167 kg, which may contribute to its extended range capabilities.
Inside, both models prioritize comfort and technology. The Tavascan offers a spacious 540 L trunk and ample space for five passengers, making it ideal for family outings. The cabin is equipped with modern amenities that accentuate its sporty appeal.
The Explorer EV, though slightly smaller, provides a 450 to 445 L trunk capacity and similar seating for five. The focus here is on intelligent space utilization and state-of-the-art infotainment systems, offering a connected and comfortable ride.
The choice between the CUPRA Tavascan and Ford Explorer EV comes down to preferred driving style and range requirements. The Tavascan exudes sporty character and robust performance, making it perfect for those looking for a drive that excites. Conversely, the Explorer EV delivers versatility in battery options and slightly more extended range, catering to drivers prioritizing efficiency and economy.
Regardless of choice, both SUVs are exemplary of the exciting evolution in electric vehicle technology, promising thrilling drives while contributing positively to environmental sustainability.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Ford Explorer EV has a clearly perceptible advantage in terms of price – it starts at 34200 £, while the CUPRA Tavascan costs 45700 £. That’s a price difference of around 11520 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Ford Explorer EV: with 14.50 kWh per 100 km, it’s minimal more efficient than the CUPRA Tavascan with 15.90 kWh. That’s a difference of about 1.40 kWh.
As for range, the Ford Explorer EV performs minimal better – achieving up to 602 km, about 49 km more than the CUPRA Tavascan.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
Both models deliver identical power – 340 HP each.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Explorer EV is hardly perceptible quicker – completing the sprint in 5.30 s, while the CUPRA Tavascan takes 5.50 s. That’s about 0.20 s faster.
There’s no difference in top speed – both reach 180 km/h.
Both models offer the same torque – 679 Nm.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Ford Explorer EV is somewhat lighter – 1908 kg compared to 2178 kg. The difference is around 270 kg.
In terms of boot space, the CUPRA Tavascan offers slightly more room – 540 L compared to 450 L. That’s a difference of about 90 L.
When it comes to payload, Ford Explorer EV to a small extent takes the win – 585 kg compared to 522 kg. That’s a difference of about 63 kg.
Overall, the Ford Explorer EV shows itself to be leaves the rival little chance and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
The CUPRA Tavascan is a striking electric crossover that blends aggressive, sporty design with surprising everyday practicality, pairing a coupe-like silhouette with SUV versatility. It feels lively and engaging on the road while offering premium touches inside, making it a compelling choice for buyers who want attitude without sacrificing comfort.
details
@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
The Ford Explorer EV translates the familiar big‑American SUV presence into whisper‑quiet electric motoring, offering roomy seating and a tech‑forward cabin that will please families and road‑trippers alike. It drives with more composure than its boxy looks suggest, blending a comfortable ride and eager acceleration while undercutting the guilt of gas stops — a practical, modern alternative for buyers who want Explorer space with electric charm.
details
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
|
@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
|
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
45700 - 49600 £
|
Price
34200 - 48800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.9 - 17.1 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.5 - 17.2 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
513 - 553 km
|
Electric Range
360 - 602 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
77 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
52 - 79 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
2178 - 2273 kg
|
Curb weight
1908 - 2179 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
540 L
|
Trunk capacity
445 - 450 L
|
|
Length
4644 mm
|
Length
4468 mm
|
|
Width
1861 mm
|
Width
1871 mm
|
|
Height
1597 mm
|
Height
1630 - 1639 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
1417 - 1422 L
|
|
Payload
507 - 522 kg
|
Payload
561 - 585 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
286 - 340 HP
|
Power HP
170 - 340 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.5 - 6.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.3 - 8.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
Max Speed
160 - 180 km/h
|
|
Torque
545 - 679 Nm
|
Torque
310 - 679 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
210 - 250 kW
|
Power kW
125 - 250 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
CUPRA
|
Brand
Ford
|
Available configurations include Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España