VS

CUPRA Tavascan vs Skoda Enyaq comparison

Compare performance (340 HP vs 340 HP), boot space and price (42,800 £ vs 36,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – CUPRA Tavascan or Skoda Enyaq?

CUPRA Tavascan vs Skoda Enyaq: Key differences

CUPRA Tavascan

4.5 (3 Reviews)
rate
details

Skoda Enyaq

4.6 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • a bit cheaper
  • marginally more efficient
  • very slightly more electric range
  • only slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • only slightly lighter
  • marginally more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Tavascan

CUPRA Tavascan vs Skoda Enyaq: which electric SUV suits you?

The CUPRA Tavascan and Skoda Enyaq take two distinct paths to the same goal: a calm, capable, family-friendly electric SUV. In this CUPRA Tavascan VS Skoda Enyaq matchup, one leans into drama and driver focus, the other into serenity and space. Both are impressively quiet and secure at speed, yet the way they go about long trips, daily chores and family duty differs in ways you’ll notice from day one. Here’s how they really feel to live with, and who each one suits best.

Enyaq

Driving character and long‑distance comfort

The CUPRA Tavascan feels tauter and a touch more alert from behind the wheel, with steering that encourages tidy inputs and a chassis that stays composed when roads turn scruffy. Ride comfort depends heavily on wheel choice and adaptive dampers; pick sensible wheels and it settles into an easy, hushed cruise. The Skoda Enyaq majors on unflustered progress, floating along with a gentler helm and an almost lounge‑like calm at motorway pace. On very long runs, the Enyaq’s slightly better charging cadence and range take the edge off planning, whereas the Tavascan’s slower peak DC rate can mean stops that feel a little longer than the speed suggests.

Tavascan

Cabin mood and perceived quality

Inside, the CUPRA Tavascan is theatre: a bold center spine, angular themes and rich lighting give it a designer feel that still reads as solidly built. The front seats are supportive and the driving position is spot on, but the coupé roofline trims rear headroom and the small back window doesn’t help the airy sensation. The Skoda Enyaq takes the opposite tack with a calm, open layout, excellent outward visibility and materials that feel quietly upmarket rather than flashy. Both cabins feel well insulated from noise; the difference is that the Tavascan excites, while the Enyaq soothes.

Enyaq

Everyday usability and tech

The Tavascan’s big touchscreen is fast and the menus are more logical than older group efforts, but touch sliders and capacitive pads still demand more attention than they should. The Enyaq’s updated interface adds helpful shortcuts and clearer structure, yet it too leans on the screen more than physical controls, so climate tweaks still need a tap or two. Driver assists are broadly effective in both, though the Tavascan’s software can feel fussier at times, while the Skoda goes about its business with less drama. In town, both are easy to place thanks to light steering and tight turning for their size, but the Enyaq’s better rearward view reduces reliance on cameras where the Tavascan’s coupe tail and lack of a rear wiper make you work harder in bad weather.

Tavascan

Space, storage and family life

If you regularly carry adults in the back, the Skoda Enyaq’s generous headroom, wide doors and flat floor make life palpably easier. Its boot is usefully squarer and comes with thoughtful touches that make weekly shops and holiday cases simpler to manage. The CUPRA Tavascan counters with a well‑shaped load bay and a low sill, but independent measurements often find its real‑world volume a notch below brochure claims, and tall rear passengers will notice the roofline. Both offer the expected ISOFIX points and solid safety credentials; neither provides a front trunk, so cable storage relies on under‑floor solutions in the rear.

Enyaq

Costs, efficiency and buyer fit

The Skoda Enyaq typically undercuts the CUPRA Tavascan on price and tends to eke out a little more distance per charge, which helps running‑cost maths for high‑milers and company‑car users. It also maintains strong long‑trip momentum thanks to steadier rapid‑charging performance, reinforcing its role as the effortless family cruiser. The CUPRA Tavascan answers with standout design, a more engaging feel on a good road, and in many markets an appealing long warranty—just budget time for slightly longer charging halts on cross‑continent days. In short, pick the Enyaq if you value space, calm and cost clarity; choose the Tavascan if you want your family EV to feel special every time you climb in, and you’re happy to trade a little touring efficiency for style and character.

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Elroq
VS
Choosing between the Skoda Enyaq and the Skoda Elroq comes down to whether you want a spacious, all-electric family SUV or a more compact, conventionally powered crossover focused on practicality. I’ll highlight the real-world differences — range and running costs, interior space and usability, …
Skoda Enyaq
Kia EV5
VS
Comparing the Škoda Enyaq and the Kia EV5 pits two spacious, family-friendly electric SUVs against each other: the Enyaq focuses on practicality, value and a straightforward user experience, while the EV5 emphasizes cutting-edge cabin tech, distinctive styling and a more premium feel. This short …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Tavascan

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Skoda Enyaq is a bit cheaper – starting at 36,800 £ , while the CUPRA Tavascan costs 42,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5,923 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Skoda Enyaq is marginally more efficient: consuming 14.9 kWh/100km compared to 15.4 kWh/100km for the CUPRA Tavascan. That’s a difference of about 0.5 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Skoda Enyaq offers very slightly more range – reaching up to 589 km, about 32 km more than the CUPRA Tavascan.

Enyaq

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

Both models deliver identical power – 340 HP each.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Enyaq is only slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.4 s, while the CUPRA Tavascan takes 5.5 s. That’s about 0.1 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Enyaq delivers moderately more torque with 679 Nm compared to 545 Nm. That’s about 134 Nm more.

Tavascan

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Skoda Enyaq is only slightly lighter – 2,074 kg compared to 2,096 kg. The difference is around 22 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Skoda Enyaq offers marginally more boot space – 585 L compared to 540 L. That’s a difference of about 45 L.

When it comes to payload, the Skoda Enyaq carries very slightly more – 526 kg compared to 518 kg. That’s a difference of about 8 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Enyaq comes out clearly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £36,800
Enyaq

Skoda Enyaq

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 190 - 340 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 14.9 - 15.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 449 - 589 km
details
CUPRA Tavascan
Skoda Enyaq

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

CUPRA Tavascan

The Cupra Tavascan blends athletic styling with a premium, driver-focused cabin, giving the electric crossover a distinctly sporty character. It feels poised and engaging on the road while standing out with bold design cues and a modern, high-quality finish.

details
89C3E534-A830-42FA-86CC-BA89F47CCA5A
E1499BC5-9624-4D31-A93B-93D1887B3824
2C084747-FC5E-41F7-84AE-11FE7F54C046

Reviews CUPRA Tavascan

4.5 (3 Reviews)
rate
David
25 Apr 2026, 10:57:49

Both are very good. The range and energy consumption is beter in the cupra. The cupra is also more responsive and it handles beter. The Kia is more spacious and slightly beter tech wise. The Kia is more a family car.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Skoda Enyaq

The Skoda Enyaq is a practical and well-appointed electric SUV that blends a roomy interior and everyday usability with clean, understated design. It’s a comfortable, efficient choice for buyers who want a sensible electric family car without flash, backed by solid build quality and clever practicality.

details
04_new_skoda_enyaq_68cf74d6-1920x1280
11_new_skoda_enyaq_c2b962a0-1920x1280
12_new_skoda_enyaq_de0afe4c-1920x1280
33_new_skoda_enyaq_833cbb5e-1920x1440
48_new_skoda_enyaq_interior_dad4ad75-1920x1280
49_new_skoda_enyaq_interior_37c35e34-1920x1280
50_new_skoda_enyaq_coupe_f55ae8bb-1920x1858

Reviews Skoda Enyaq

4.6 (5 Reviews)
rate
Delporte
16 May 2026, 16:33:37

More options and more room for discounts and negotiation, just as comfortable, better than a Hyundai Ioniq 5 (which is not comfortable at all), a Toyota bZ4X (feels cramped and has little space), a Tesla Model Y Premium (a bit too high-tech for me but otherwise fine), a Jaecoo 5 (entry-level, comfort impeccable but no options and little tech), and an Omoda (less comfortable and very few options). This is all a personal opinion — we drove the cars mentioned above and the Skoda seems the best value for money with good comfort, a variety of options and reliable after-sales service close to us.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Alfaknaggen
11 Mar 2026, 18:30:11

Well‑thought-out and practical car (85x MY2024) that unfortunately lets you down because of system bugs and irritating driver‑assist systems that can't cope with ordinary autumn or winter weather without throwing up error messages and warnings.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Enyaq
VW ID.7 Touring
VS
Comparing the Skoda Enyaq and the Volkswagen ID.7 Touring pits a practical, roomy electric SUV against a sleek, long-distance electric estate. Both share VW Group underpinnings, but the Enyaq prioritizes interior space and value while the ID.7 Touring focuses on aerodynamic efficiency, range and …
CUPRA Tavascan
CUPRA Terramar
VS
The Cupra Tavascan is Cupra’s all-electric crossover, offering sleek styling and EV-focused tech, while the Cupra Terramar targets buyers who prefer a compact, performance-oriented SUV with a conventional powertrain. This comparison cuts through driving character, practicality, equipment and …
CUPRA Tavascan
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The CUPRA Tavascan storms into the compact crossover arena as an electric firebrand with sharp looks and sporty intent, while the Toyota C-HR+ plays the clever, comfort-first contrarian with hybrid thrift and quirky flair. Which one earns your driveway space — the bold, battery-powered Tavascan or …
Ford Explorer EV
Skoda Enyaq
VS
Here’s a clear comparison between the Ford Explorer EV and the Skoda Enyaq to help determine which electric SUV suits your needs. I’ll focus on driving range, interior space, technology and overall value so you can pick the right balance of practicality and performance.
Skoda Enyaq
VW ID.7
VS
The Skoda Enyaq and the VW ID.7 share the VW Group’s MEB electric platform, but they’re aimed at different buyers. The Enyaq is a practical, family-focused SUV that emphasizes interior space, usability and value, while the ID.7 is a sleek, aerodynamic saloon tuned for long-range efficiency and …
Skoda Enyaq
Volvo EX60
VS
Practical Czech engineering goes up against Swedish style in our showdown between the Skoda Enyaq and the Volvo EX60. The Enyaq focuses on roomy practicality and sensible value, while the EX60 answers with sharper design, richer tech and a more premium feel — choose based on whether you want …
Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
Skoda Enyaq and Skoda Kodiaq target very different buyers: the Enyaq is an all-electric SUV focused on efficiency, modern tech and city-friendly driving, while the Kodiaq is a larger, traditional family SUV offering seven seats, greater towing and cargo capacity. This quick comparison highlights …
Skoda Enyaq
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The Škoda Enyaq and the Toyota C‑HR represent very different takes on the modern crossover: the Enyaq is a roomy, all‑electric SUV focused on practicality and range, while the C‑HR is a compact, style‑led crossover available with petrol and hybrid powertrains. Which suits you depends on whether you …
CUPRA Tavascan
Skoda Enyaq

Costs and Consumption
Price
42,800 - 50,500 £
Price
36,800 - 52,800 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
15.4 - 17.1 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 15.9 kWh/100km
Electric Range
441 - 557 km
Electric Range
449 - 589 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,096 - 2,273 kg
Curb weight
2,074 - 2,284 kg
Trunk capacity
540 L
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,861 mm
Width
1,879 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
507 - 518 kg
Payload
449 - 526 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
190 - 340 HP
Power HP
190 - 340 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.5 - 8.6 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.6 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
350 - 545 Nm
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
140 - 250 kW
Power kW
140 - 250 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
CUPRA
Brand
Skoda
What drive types are available for the CUPRA Tavascan?

The CUPRA Tavascan is offered with Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.