VS

Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Nissan X-Trail comparison

Compare performance (487 HP vs 213 HP), boot space and price (48,400 £ vs 34,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Mustang Mach-E or Nissan X-Trail?

Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Nissan X-Trail: Key differences

Ford Mustang Mach-E

3.4 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly more power
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Nissan X-Trail

4.6 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • visibly lighter
  • somewhat more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Mustang Mach-E

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Nissan X-Trail is clearly cheaper – starting at 34,200 £ , while the Ford Mustang Mach-E costs 48,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 14,271 £.

X-Trail

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers significantly more power – delivering 487 HP compared to 213 HP. That’s roughly 274 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Mustang Mach-E is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 3.8 s, while the Nissan X-Trail takes 7 s. That’s about 3.2 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Mustang Mach-E delivers clearly more torque with 950 Nm compared to 525 Nm. That’s about 425 Nm more.

Mustang Mach-E

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: Nissan X-Trail offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Nissan X-Trail is visibly lighter – 1,668 kg compared to 2,161 kg. The difference is around 493 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Nissan X-Trail offers somewhat more boot space – 585 L compared to 519 L. That’s a difference of about 66 L.

When it comes to payload, the Nissan X-Trail carries noticeably more – 574 kg compared to 450 kg. That’s a difference of about 124 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Mustang Mach-E is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £48,400
Mustang Mach-E

Ford Mustang Mach-E

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 268 - 487 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 17.7 - 21 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 470 - 600 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Ford Capri
Ford Mustang Mach-E
VS
The Ford Capri and the Ford Mustang Mach-E represent two very different takes on driving pleasure—one a classic sporty coupe with nostalgic charm, the other a modern all-electric crossover with high-tech performance. This comparison will help you weigh classic style and driving feel against …
Ford Explorer EV
Ford Mustang Mach-E
VS
The Ford Explorer EV swaps the Mustang Mach‑E’s athletic poise for SUV practicality, three-row space and a taller stance — ideal if you need family duties, towing and sensible range without sacrificing slick tech. But if you crave sharper handling, a sportier silhouette and a more emotional drive, …
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Nissan X-Trail

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Ford Mustang Mach-E

The Mustang Mach-E proves an electric SUV can be both playful and practical, with the Mustang name bringing muscle-car charisma to a family-friendly package. It delivers eager performance, a comfortable cabin, and a slick infotainment setup that keeps daily driving fun — and yes, you’ll still get admiring glances at the lights.

details
2020_FORD_MACH-E_AWD_23-LOW
2020_FORD_MACH-E_AWD_19-LOW
2020_FORD_MACH-E_AWD_24-LOW
2020_FORD_MACH-E_AWD_05-LOW
2020_FORD_MACH-E_AWD_09-LOW

Reviews Ford Mustang Mach-E

3.4 (3 Reviews)
rate
Yvo Trimbos
15 Mar 2026, 19:07:15

Lovely car with sporty handling and fantastic seats.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
M
7 Dec 2025, 19:35:44

Rubbish car.

Features clearly not as polished as other EV SUVs at similar prices (e.g. Volvo EX40 / BYD Sealion 7))

Alarms about driver fatigues every 10 minutes.

Monika
6 Nov 2025, 16:28:23

Well-built car, reasonably priced — unlike the inflated costs of German cars.

Nissan X-Trail

The Nissan X-Trail is a roomy, no-nonsense family SUV that mixes sensible practicality with a quietly modern look, making it an easy choice for busy lives and weekend escapes. It drives with calm confidence, delivers a comfortable ride and sensible tech, and won’t demand drama while doing the everyday heavy lifting.

details
X-Trail - Dynamic High 22
X-Trail - Dynamic High 14
Nissan_Xtrail_High_043
Nissan_Xtrail_High_033

Reviews Nissan X-Trail

4.6 (5 Reviews)
rate
Marcin
17 Feb 2026, 12:21:57

I drive an Outback every day; I had an X‑Trail as a courtesy car while mine was in for service. First impression after a few kilometres of driving — the suspension is a disaster. You get the feeling this car picks up every single imperfection in the tarmac. Also, at idle the engine causes noticeably more vibrations in the cabin than the Subaru. On the plus side, a more ergonomic gear lever and 360° cameras. But I wouldn’t swap...

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Rafał
6 Feb 2026, 00:23:47

Beautiful, modern design, very good-quality materials, mega acceleration and power. Very modern, loaded with electronics. This is my second Nissan X‑Trail.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Shan Ak
24 Jan 2026, 14:20:58

I have 163 hp platinum premium pack . Car is going very smoothly and comfortable. Also powerful and useful details.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Hyundai Tucson
Nissan X-Trail
VS
Hyundai Tucson arrives with sharper styling, a high-tech cabin and punchy powertrain options — the gadget-forward, sporty choice for buyers who want flair and value. Nissan X‑Trail plays the practical card: roomier, more family-friendly and supremely comfortable on long runs, so pick the Tucson to …
Ford Kuga
Nissan X-Trail
VS
Choosing between the Ford Kuga and the Nissan X-Trail comes down to whether you prefer a sportier, tech-focused compact SUV or a more spacious, family-oriented and practical option. The Kuga offers sharper handling and up-to-date infotainment, while the X-Trail emphasizes cabin space, comfort and …
CUPRA Tavascan
Ford Mustang Mach-E
VS
The CUPRA Tavascan and the Ford Mustang Mach‑E are two electric SUVs that blend sporty performance with everyday practicality, but they take very different approaches to design, driving feel and technology. This comparison will help you see how the Tavascan’s sharp handling and striking CUPRA …
Mazda CX-60
Nissan X-Trail
VS
The Mazda CX-60 and Nissan X-Trail compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Nissan X-Trail
Volvo XC40
VS
The Nissan X-Trail and Volvo XC40 compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Nissan X-Trail
Dacia Bigster
VS
In the competitive SUV segment, the Nissan X-Trail showcases its versatility with a spacious interior and advanced driver-assistance features, making it a strong contender for families and adventure-seekers alike. Meanwhile, the Dacia Bigster appeals to budget-conscious buyers with its robust …
Mazda CX-5
Nissan X-Trail
VS
In the competitive landscape of compact SUVs, the Mazda CX-5 and Nissan X-Trail stand out with their unique blend of style and practicality. The CX-5 offers a more upscale interior and a sportier driving experience, appealing to those who prioritize aesthetics and performance. Meanwhile, the …
Nissan X-Trail
Volvo XC60
VS
Unsure whether the Nissan X-Trail or the Volvo XC60 is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Nissan X-Trail

Costs and Consumption
Price
48,400 - 66,900 £
Price
34,200 - 50,500 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.9 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
17.7 - 21 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
470 - 600 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
131 - 161 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5 - 7
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,161 - 2,351 kg
Curb weight
1,668 - 1,961 kg
Trunk capacity
519 L
Trunk capacity
177 - 585 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,881 mm
Width
1,840 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
368 - 450 kg
Payload
432 - 574 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
CVT, Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
268 - 487 HP
Power HP
163 - 213 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 6.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7 - 9.6 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
525 - 950 Nm
Torque
300 - 525 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
3
Power kW
197 - 358 kW
Power kW
120 - 157 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1,497 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, D, E
Brand
Ford
Brand
Nissan
What drivetrain options does the Ford Mustang Mach-E have?

The Ford Mustang Mach-E is offered with Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.