In the competitive crossover segment, the Nissan X-Trail and Renault Austral offer distinct features that cater to diverse driving preferences. The X-Trail excels with its robust all-wheel-drive capabilities and spacious interior, making it a top choice for families and outdoor enthusiasts. Meanwhile, the Austral impresses with its stylish design and advanced tech features, appealing to drivers seeking a modern and efficient urban vehicle.
When it comes to the competitive SUV market, the Nissan X-Trail and Renault Austral stand out as two noteworthy contenders, each bringing a unique blend of features, performance, and practicality. This comparison explores their technical specifications, innovations, and overall suitability for daily driving and adventure alike.
The Nissan X-Trail boasts a robust and bold exterior, measuring 4680 mm in length, 1840 mm in width, and standing 1720 mm tall, which gives it a commanding presence on the road. Its thoughtful design also includes ample trunk space, offering a maximum capacity of 585 liters, making it perfect for families and long journeys.
In contrast, the Renault Austral is slightly more compact, with dimensions of 4510 mm in length, 1825 mm in width, and 1618 mm in height. Its trunk capacity is also respectable but smaller at 500 liters. While the Austral may not have quite the same volume for cargo as the X-Trail, its design still emphasizes practicality for everyday use.
Both SUVs feature advanced engine options, with the Nissan X-Trail available in multiple configurations, including petrol MHEV and full hybrid models. The X-Trail's power ranges from 163 to 213 horsepower, with torque figures peaking at 525 Nm, ensuring it can handle a variety of driving conditions. Acceleration from 0-100 km/h is impressive, with times as quick as 7 seconds, depending on the variant.
The Renault Austral, while slightly less powerful, still delivers a competent performance with engines producing up to 200 horsepower and 270 Nm of torque. It achieves similar 0-100 km/h times, with the quickest variant reaching 8.4 seconds. Both models have automatic transmissions, but the X-Trail also offers a CVT setup along with a reduction gearbox for enhanced off-road capability.
In the race for efficiency, the Nissan X-Trail performs admirably, with fuel consumption ratings ranging from 5.7 to 6.9 L/100km depending on the variant. The capabilities of a hybrid system give it an edge in eco-friendliness, making it a great choice for environmentally conscious drivers.
The Renault Austral, however, excels in fuel efficiency with ratings as low as 4.7 L/100km, particularly in its hybrid variant, offering a potentially lower running cost for everyday driving. The lower emissions of 105 g/km also underscore its eco-friendly design ethos.
Inside the Nissan X-Trail, you'll find a spacious and technologically advanced cabin suitable for up to seven passengers in certain configurations. Features include advanced safety systems, a user-friendly infotainment system, and high-quality materials that enhance comfort and driving pleasure.
On the other hand, the Renault Austral focuses on tech-savvy solutions, boasting a sleek interior equipped with the latest in infotainment technology and driver-assistance features. Its cabin, while not as spacious as the X-Trail’s, offers a modern feel that appeals to younger audiences and tech enthusiasts.
The Nissan X-Trail's all-wheel drive option gives it a significant advantage in terms of handling and stability, particularly in adverse weather conditions or off-road situations. Its well-tuned suspension provides a smooth ride, balancing comfort with sportiness.
Meanwhile, the Renault Austral’s front-wheel drive system, paired with its lighter curb weight of 1539 to 1592 kg, offers nimble handling and responsiveness. Its smaller footprint allows easy maneuverability in urban settings, making it quite practical for city dwellers.
The comparison between the Nissan X-Trail and Renault Austral reveals two strong contenders in the SUV segment, each perfectly suited to different driver needs. The X-Trail emerges as the choice for those needing space, a powerful engine, and all-wheel drive capabilities, while the Austral appeals to those who prioritize fuel efficiency, innovative technology, and a modern design.
Ultimately, both vehicles reflect their brands' commitment to innovation and quality, making them worthy options in today’s dynamic automotive landscape.
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
---|---|
Price
about 33800 - 50100
£
|
Price
about 29400 - 38500
£
|
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.9
L
|
Consumption L/100km
4.7 - 6.1
L
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
co2
131 - 161
g/km
|
co2
105 - 139
g/km
|
Fuel tank capacity
55
L
|
Fuel tank capacity
55
L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Seats
5 - 7
|
Seats
5
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
Curb weight
1668 - 1961
kg
|
Curb weight
1539 - 1592
kg
|
Trunk capacity
177 - 585
L
|
Trunk capacity
430 - 500
L
|
Length
4680
mm
|
Length
4510
mm
|
Width
1840
mm
|
Width
1825
mm
|
Height
1720
mm
|
Height
1618
mm
|
Payload
432 - 574
kg
|
Payload
464 - 509
kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
CVT, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
CVT, Automatic Gearbox
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Power HP
163 - 213
HP
|
Power HP
158 - 200
HP
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7 - 9.6
s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.4 - 9.7
s
|
Max Speed
170 - 200
km/h
|
Max Speed
174
km/h
|
Torque
300 - 525
Nm
|
Torque
270
Nm
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Power kW
120 - 157
kW
|
Power kW
116 - 147
kW
|
Engine capacity
1497
cm3
|
Engine capacity
1199 - 1332
cm3
|
Top speed
170 - 200
km/h
|
Top speed
174
km/h
|
General |
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2024
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, D, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
|
Brand
Nissan
|
Brand
Renault
|
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.