VS

Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Renault Mégane comparison

Compare performance (487 HP vs 218 HP), boot space and price (48,400 £ vs 35,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Mustang Mach-E or Renault Mégane?

Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Renault Mégane: Key differences

Ford Mustang Mach-E

3.4 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • visibly more electric range
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
  • noticeably more trunk space

Renault Mégane

  • visibly cheaper
  • slightly more efficient
  • noticeably lighter

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Mustang Mach-E

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Renault Mégane is visibly cheaper – starting at 35,100 £ , while the Ford Mustang Mach-E costs 48,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 13,371 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Renault Mégane is slightly more efficient: consuming 15.4 kWh/100km compared to 17.7 kWh/100km for the Ford Mustang Mach-E. That’s a difference of about 2.3 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers visibly more range – reaching up to 600 km, about 148 km more than the Renault Mégane.

Mégane

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers clearly more power – delivering 487 HP compared to 218 HP. That’s roughly 269 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Mustang Mach-E is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 3.8 s, while the Renault Mégane takes 7.4 s. That’s about 3.6 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Mustang Mach-E delivers substantially more torque with 950 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 650 Nm more.

Mustang Mach-E

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Renault Mégane is noticeably lighter – 1,719 kg compared to 2,161 kg. The difference is around 442 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers noticeably more boot space – 519 L compared to 389 L. That’s a difference of about 130 L.

When it comes to payload, the Ford Mustang Mach-E carries very slightly more – 450 kg compared to 446 kg. That’s a difference of about 4 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Mustang Mach-E holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £48,400
Mustang Mach-E

Ford Mustang Mach-E

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 268 - 487 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 17.7 - 21 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 470 - 600 km
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Renault Mégane

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Ford Mustang Mach-E

The Mustang Mach-E proves an electric SUV can be both playful and practical, with the Mustang name bringing muscle-car charisma to a family-friendly package. It delivers eager performance, a comfortable cabin, and a slick infotainment setup that keeps daily driving fun — and yes, you’ll still get admiring glances at the lights.

details

Renault Mégane

The Renault Mégane blends Gallic flair with practical everyday charm, showing that sensible transport can still have personality and poise. It’s a smart pick for buyers who want a comfortable, stylish hatchback that feels a little more special than the usual commute companion.

details
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Renault Mégane

Costs and Consumption

Price
48,400 - 66,900 £
Price
35,100 - 38,500 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
17.7 - 21 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
15.4 kWh/100km
Electric Range
470 - 600 km
Electric Range
452 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
2,161 - 2,351 kg
Curb weight
1,719 kg
Trunk capacity
519 L
Trunk capacity
389 L
Length
-
Length
4,200 mm
Width
1,881 mm
Width
1,783 mm
Height
-
Height
1,505 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1,332 L
Payload
368 - 450 kg
Payload
446 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
268 - 487 HP
Power HP
218 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 6.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
160 km/h
Torque
525 - 950 Nm
Torque
300 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
197 - 358 kW
Power kW
160 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2,025
Model Year
2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Ford
Brand
Renault
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.