Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Renault Trafic Transporter comparison
Compare performance (487 HP vs 170 HP), boot space and price (48,400 £ vs 38,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Mustang Mach-E or Renault Trafic Transporter?
Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Renault Trafic Transporter: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Mustang Mach-E
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Renault Trafic Transporter is noticeably cheaper – starting at 38,100 £ , while the Ford Mustang Mach-E costs 48,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 10,331 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Mustang Mach-E is somewhat more efficient: consuming 17.7 kWh/100km compared to 21.2 kWh/100km for the Renault Trafic Transporter. That’s a difference of about 3.5 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers considerably more range – reaching up to 600 km, about 282 km more than the Renault Trafic Transporter.
Trafic Transporter
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers considerably more power – delivering 487 HP compared to 170 HP. That’s roughly 317 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Mustang Mach-E is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.8 s, while the Renault Trafic Transporter takes 10.8 s. That’s about 7 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Mustang Mach-E delivers clearly more torque with 950 Nm compared to 380 Nm. That’s about 570 Nm more.
Mustang Mach-E
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Renault Trafic Transporter offers more seats – 6 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Renault Trafic Transporter is somewhat lighter – 1,848 kg compared to 2,161 kg. The difference is around 313 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Renault Trafic Transporter carries significantly more – 1,222 kg compared to 450 kg. That’s a difference of about 772 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Mustang Mach-E holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £48,400
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Renault Trafic Transporter
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Mustang Mach-E
The Mustang Mach-E proves an electric SUV can be both playful and practical, with the Mustang name bringing muscle-car charisma to a family-friendly package. It delivers eager performance, a comfortable cabin, and a slick infotainment setup that keeps daily driving fun — and yes, you’ll still get admiring glances at the lights.
details
Renault Trafic Transporter
The Renault Trafic is a practical, workhorse transporter that hides thoughtful cabin comfort behind a tough, utilitarian exterior, so you can tackle a busy week without sacrificing sanity. It’s a sensible choice for buyers who want reliability and clever flexibility rather than flash, with just enough character to make daily hauling feel less like a chore.
details
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Renault Trafic Transporter
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
48,400 - 66,900 £
|
Price
38,100 - 43,500 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
6.8 - 7 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.7 - 21 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
21.2 - 22.2 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
470 - 600 km
|
Electric Range
240 - 318 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 - 184 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
3 - 6
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,161 - 2,351 kg
|
Curb weight
1,848 - 2,075 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
519 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,881 mm
|
Width
1,956 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
368 - 450 kg
|
Payload
899 - 1,222 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric, Diesel
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
268 - 487 HP
|
Power HP
122 - 170 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 6.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.8 - 13.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
525 - 950 Nm
|
Torque
245 - 380 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
197 - 358 kW
|
Power kW
90 - 125 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
1,997 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2,023 - 2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, G
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Renault
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.