VS

Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Volvo V60 comparison

Compare performance (487 HP vs 350 HP), boot space and price (48,400 £ vs 51,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Mustang Mach-E or Volvo V60?

Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Volvo V60: Key differences

Ford Mustang Mach-E

3.8 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • very slightly cheaper
  • noticeably more power
  • significantly more electric range
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Volvo V60

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • markedly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Mustang Mach-E

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Ford Mustang Mach-E is very slightly cheaper – starting at 48,400 £ , while the Volvo V60 costs 51,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2,992 £.

As for electric range, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers significantly more range – reaching up to 600 km, about 501 km more than the Volvo V60.

V60

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers noticeably more power – delivering 487 HP compared to 350 HP. That’s roughly 137 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Mustang Mach-E is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.8 s, while the Volvo V60 takes 5.4 s. That’s about 1.6 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Mustang Mach-E delivers clearly more torque with 950 Nm compared to 589 Nm. That’s about 361 Nm more.

Mustang Mach-E

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Volvo V60 is markedly lighter – 1,734 kg compared to 2,161 kg. The difference is around 427 kg.

Boot capacity is identical – both offer 519 L of storage.

When it comes to payload, the Volvo V60 carries moderately more – 506 kg compared to 450 kg. That’s a difference of about 56 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Mustang Mach-E is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £48,400
Mustang Mach-E

Ford Mustang Mach-E

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 268 - 487 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 17.7 - 21 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 470 - 600 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Ford Capri
Ford Mustang Mach-E
VS
The Ford Capri and the Ford Mustang Mach-E represent two very different takes on driving pleasure—one a classic sporty coupe with nostalgic charm, the other a modern all-electric crossover with high-tech performance. This comparison will help you weigh classic style and driving feel against …
Volvo V60
Volvo XC40
VS
The Volvo V60 is a sleek, premium estate built for refined cruising and carrying larger loads, while the Volvo XC40 is a compact SUV focused on city agility, practicality and a taller driving position. Choosing between them comes down to whether you want wagon-style space and long-distance comfort …
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Volvo V60

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Ford Mustang Mach-E

The Mustang Mach-E proves an electric SUV can be both playful and practical, with the Mustang name bringing muscle-car charisma to a family-friendly package. It delivers eager performance, a comfortable cabin, and a slick infotainment setup that keeps daily driving fun — and yes, you’ll still get admiring glances at the lights.

details
2020_FORD_MACH-E_AWD_23-LOW
2020_FORD_MACH-E_AWD_19-LOW
2020_FORD_MACH-E_AWD_24-LOW
2020_FORD_MACH-E_AWD_05-LOW
2020_FORD_MACH-E_AWD_09-LOW

Reviews Ford Mustang Mach-E

3.8 (4 Reviews)
rate
Roel
10 Jun 2026, 04:25:36

Incredibly beautiful SUV. The most beautiful one out there in terms of style.
The interior could be a bit more modern... but the seats feel amazing.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Yvo Trimbos
15 Mar 2026, 19:07:15

Lovely car with sporty handling and fantastic seats.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
M
7 Dec 2025, 19:35:44

Rubbish car.

Features clearly not as polished as other EV SUVs at similar prices (e.g. Volvo EX40 / BYD Sealion 7))

Alarms about driver fatigues every 10 minutes.

Monika
6 Nov 2025, 16:28:23

Well-built car, reasonably priced — unlike the inflated costs of German cars.

Volvo V60

The Volvo V60 blends elegant Scandinavian design with a practical estate layout, making it a composed and sensible choice for buyers who want style without sacrifice. Inside, a serene cabin, clever safety features and a supple ride turn daily commutes and weekend getaways into effortless, grown-up motoring.

details
228902_New_Volvo_V60_D4_Inscription_Denim_Blue
228900_New_Volvo_V60_D4_Inscription_Denim_Blue
228898_New_Volvo_V60_D4_Inscription_Denim_Blue
247770_Volvo_V60_T8_Test_Drive_in_Lule_Sweden
223558_New_Volvo_V60_exterior

Reviews Volvo V60

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
Michael Hauser
2 Oct 2025, 08:00:10

I drive a V60 T6 TE e‑AWD Inscription MY 2022

Overall I'm very satisfied with it.

Positives +
+ Safety
+ Performance
+ Fuel consumption
+ Service and running costs
+ Driving feel (still has a bit of the Swedish tank about it)
+ Average consumption 5.2 l/100 km

Negatives -
- 180 km/h limiter, supposedly due to excessive centrifugal forces on the electric motor
- Thinner side windows than the predecessor
- Still very firm suspension
- 8‑speed automatic (feels like the car is always shifting)
- Volvo's own customer service has massively deteriorated in recent years (their new motto seems to be "take it or leave it")

As a long‑time Volvo customer, this will be my last Volvo — I'm not willing to go along with the (now purely electric and largely China‑produced) madness.

Frequently compared as well

Volvo V60
VW Passat
VS
The Volvo V60 and the VW Passat are two mid-size family cars that prioritize safety and practicality, but they take different approaches to comfort, design and driving feel. This comparison focuses on performance, interior quality, space, technology and running costs to help you decide which suits …
Skoda Octavia Combi
Volvo V60
VS
Skoda Octavia Combi and Volvo V60 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Skoda Octavia Combi …
Toyota Corolla Touring Sports
Volvo V60
VS
Toyota Corolla Touring Sports and Volvo V60 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Toyota …
Ford Explorer EV
Ford Mustang Mach-E
VS
The Ford Explorer EV swaps the Mustang Mach‑E’s athletic poise for SUV practicality, three-row space and a taller stance — ideal if you need family duties, towing and sensible range without sacrificing slick tech. But if you crave sharper handling, a sportier silhouette and a more emotional drive, …
Volvo V60
Volvo XC60
VS
The V60 is the sleek, driver-focused estate that rewards cornering with a lower centre of gravity and tidy practicality, ideal if you want sporty poise without shouting SUV. The XC60 lifts you up for easier access, more upright space and a confident road presence — perfect for families or anyone …
BMW 3 Series Touring
Volvo V60
VS
The BMW 3 Series Touring and the Volvo V60 are two of the most compelling premium estate cars you can buy, but they take different approaches: the BMW prioritizes driving dynamics and sportiness, while the Volvo focuses on comfort, safety and Scandinavian practicality. This comparison will help you …
Volvo V60
Volvo V90
VS
The Volvo V60 and V90 are both premium station wagons but serve different needs: the V60 is a sportier, more compact option, while the V90 offers greater space and a more luxurious ride. Choose the V60 if you prioritise agility and city-friendly size; choose the V90 if you need rear-seat room, …
BMW iX3
Ford Mustang Mach-E
VS
BMW iX3 and Ford Mustang Mach-E go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the BMW iX3 or the Ford …
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Volvo V60

Costs and Consumption
Price
48,400 - 66,900 £
Price
51,400 - 62,500 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
2 - 6.2 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
17.7 - 21 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
470 - 600 km
Electric Range
99 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
45 - 141 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Estate
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,161 - 2,351 kg
Curb weight
1,734 - 2,070 kg
Trunk capacity
519 L
Trunk capacity
519 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,881 mm
Width
1,850 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
368 - 450 kg
Payload
460 - 506 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
268 - 487 HP
Power HP
197 - 350 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 6.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 7.6 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
525 - 950 Nm
Torque
300 - 589 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
197 - 358 kW
Power kW
145 - 247 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, B
Brand
Ford
Brand
Volvo
What drivetrain options does the Ford Mustang Mach-E have?

The Ford Mustang Mach-E is offered with Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.