VS

Ford Ranger vs Mazda CX-5 comparison

Compare performance (292 HP vs 141 HP), boot space and price (45,600 £ vs 30,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Ranger or Mazda CX-5?

Ford Ranger vs Mazda CX-5: Key differences

Ford Ranger

  • substantially more power
  • significantly more efficient
  • markedly quicker 0–100 km/h

Mazda CX-5

4.6 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • substantially lighter

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Ranger

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Mazda CX-5 is significantly cheaper – starting at 30,000 £ , while the Ford Ranger costs 45,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 15,592 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Ranger uses 3.1 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Mazda CX-5 with 7 L/100km. The difference is about 3.9 L/100km.

CX-5

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Ranger offers substantially more power – delivering 292 HP compared to 141 HP. That’s roughly 151 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Ranger is markedly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.9 s, while the Mazda CX-5 takes 10.5 s. That’s about 2.6 s quicker.

Looking at top speed, the Mazda CX-5 is only slightly faster – reaching 195 km/h, while the Ford Ranger tops out at 190 km/h. The difference is around 5 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Ranger delivers substantially more torque with 697 Nm compared to 238 Nm. That’s about 459 Nm more.

Ranger

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-5 is substantially lighter – 1,629 kg compared to 2,405 kg. The difference is around 776 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Ford Ranger carries noticeably more – 989 kg compared to 601 kg. That’s a difference of about 388 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Ranger is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £45,600
Ranger

Ford Ranger

  • Engine Type : Diesel, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 210 - 292 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 3.1 - 13.8 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 42 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-60
VS
If you want a compact, affordable SUV that’s fun to drive and sensible for most families, the Mazda CX-5 remains the clever everyday choice; if you crave more space, a buttoned-up premium cabin and the option of a potent straight-six or PHEV, the Mazda CX-60 steps up as the grown-up alternative. …
Ford Kuga
Mazda CX-5
VS
The Ford Kuga is the sensible all‑rounder — roomy, loaded with hybrid options and family-friendly tech — while the Mazda CX‑5 plays the premium card with richer materials and more engaging steering. Choose the Kuga for practicality and efficiency, the CX‑5 if you want style, refinement and a …
Ford Ranger
Mazda CX-5

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Ford Ranger

The Ford Ranger is a workhorse with the manners of a grown-up pickup—practical, tough, and surprisingly civilized on the road. It’s the sort of truck that laughs at mud on the weekend and performs like a sensible daily driver during the week, making it an easy sell for buyers who want capability without theatrics.

details
CAF9EC78-BCC5-44DD-A6CB-AA214C4B486C
A5679221-BE7E-4493-B2BF-37FB664B42A8

Reviews Ford Ranger

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Mazda CX-5

The Mazda CX-5 blends elegant, athletic styling with a surprisingly engaging driving character, turning routine trips into small, satisfying adventures. Inside it feels thoughtfully built and comfortable, offering sensible practicality and a premium feel that punches above its price.

details
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_21 (1)
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_28
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_int_1

Reviews Mazda CX-5

4.6 (7 Reviews)
rate
Bengt
25 Jan 2026, 14:05:09

I've owned several Volvos, but I drive a Mazda now and would never switch back.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Lexus NX
Mazda CX-5
VS
The Lexus NX stands out with its luxurious interior and advanced technology features, offering a refined driving experience that appeals to upscale buyers. In contrast, the Mazda CX-5 impresses with its sporty handling and engaging dynamics, making it a favorite among those who prioritize fun …
Mazda CX-5
VW Tayron
VS
The Mazda CX-5 and VW Tayron offer a fascinating comparison in the compact SUV segment, each catering to distinct driver preferences. The CX-5, renowned for its engaging driving dynamics and upscale interior, promises a spirited yet comfortable ride. Meanwhile, the Tayron, with its robust build and …
Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-6e
VS
Unsure whether the Mazda CX-5 or the Mazda CX-6e is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Mazda CX-5
Skoda Karoq
VS
The Mazda CX-5 courts you with a near-luxury cabin and engaging handling that turns everyday drives into something livelier, while the Skoda Karoq sticks to a sensible script — clever storage, roomy rear seats and sharp value for families. Choose the CX-5 if you want style, poise and a more premium …
Mazda CX-5
Volvo XC40
VS
In the competitive compact SUV market, the Mazda CX-5 stands out with its sleek design and engaging driving dynamics, offering a more spirited experience behind the wheel. Meanwhile, the Volvo XC40 charms with its robust safety features and Scandinavian-inspired interior, prioritizing comfort and …
Mazda CX-5
Renault Austral
VS
In the highly competitive compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-5 continues to stand out with its sleek design, upscale interior, and refined driving dynamics. In contrast, the Renault Austral brings a fresh approach with its modern tech offerings and distinctive European flair, making it a formidable …
CUPRA Terramar
Mazda CX-5
VS
In the competitive landscape of compact SUVs, the CUPRA Terramar stands out with its bold design and dynamic performance, appealing to driving enthusiasts who crave a sportier feel. On the other hand, the Mazda CX-5 offers a more refined ride with its upscale interior and focus on comfort, making …
Honda HR-V
Mazda CX-5
VS
In the showdown between the Honda HR-V and the Mazda CX-5, the HR-V impresses with its spacious interior and exceptional fuel efficiency, making it an ideal choice for urban drivers and small families. Meanwhile, the CX-5 stands out with its sleek design and robust performance, offering a more …
Ford Ranger
Mazda CX-5

Costs and Consumption
Price
45,600 - 71,900 £
Price
30,000 - 39,500 £
Consumption L/100km
3.1 - 13.8 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
7 - 7.4 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
42 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
11.8 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
70 - 315 g/km
co2
157 - 168 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
80 L
Fuel tank capacity
56 - 58 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Pickup
Body Type
SUV
Seats
4 - 5
Seats
5
Doors
4
Doors
5
Curb weight
2,405 - 2,511 kg
Curb weight
1,629 - 1,671 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
466 - 583 L
Length
5,370 - 5,381 mm
Length
4,690 mm
Width
1,918 - 1,968 mm
Width
1,860 mm
Height
1,884 - 1,922 mm
Height
1,695 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
2,019 L
Payload
676 - 989 kg
Payload
601 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Diesel, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
210 - 292 HP
Power HP
141 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.9 - 9.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.5 - 10.9 s
Max Speed
180 - 190 km/h
Max Speed
195 km/h
Torque
491 - 697 Nm
Torque
238 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
154 - 215 kW
Power kW
104 kW
Engine capacity
1,996 - 2,993 cm3
Engine capacity
2,488 cm3

General
Model Year
2,022 - 2,025
Model Year
2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
F
Brand
Ford
Brand
Mazda
What drivetrain options does the Ford Ranger have?

The Ford Ranger is available as All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.