@ Mazda Motor Corporation

@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Mazda CX-5 vs Skoda Kodiaq – Differences & prices compared

Q: How powerful is the Mazda CX-5's engine?

Up to 141 HP of power – depending on the configuration.

Q: What is the fuel consumption of the Mazda CX-5 according to the manufacturer?

Fuel consumption according to the manufacturer is 7 L.

Q: What is the top speed of the Mazda CX-5?

Depending on the model, top speed is 195 km/h.

Q: How much luggage fits in the Mazda CX-5?

Depending on configuration, up to 583 L fit inside.

Q: What are the dimensions of the Mazda CX-5?

The Mazda CX-5 measures 4690 mm long, 1860 mm wide and 1695 mm high.

Q: What drive types are available for the Skoda Kodiaq?

The Skoda Kodiaq is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

Q: What is the maximum horsepower of the Skoda Kodiaq?

Depending on the version, the Skoda Kodiaq delivers up to 265 HP.

Q: What is the fuel consumption of the Skoda Kodiaq according to the manufacturer?

On average, the Skoda Kodiaq consumes 0.40 L.

Q: What is the Skoda Kodiaq’s maximum WLTP range?

According to WLTP, the Skoda Kodiaq can travel up to 123 km on a single charge.

Two cars, one duel: Mazda CX-5 meets Skoda Kodiaq.
Which one wins in performance, efficiency and value for money? Find out now!

scroll down

CX-5 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Mazda CX-5 vs Skoda Kodiaq: The Battle of the SUVs

In the crowded field of SUVs, both Mazda and Skoda have made significant strides with their respective models, the CX-5 and the Kodiaq. While both vehicles offer the versatility and comfort that come with an SUV, they cater to slightly different sets of preferences and needs. Let's delve into how these two powerhouses perform against each other from a technical and innovative standpoint.

Kodiaq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Engine Options and Performance

The Mazda CX-5 presents a robust lineup of engine options, featuring both petrol mild hybrid and diesel variants. This Japanese SUV offers power outputs ranging from 150 to 194 HP with a choice between manual and automatic transmissions. The CX-5 provides a reliable drive experience with options for both front-wheel and all-wheel drive. The acceleration time from 0 to 100 km/h is between 9.2 and 11.1 seconds, demonstrating effective balance and agility.

On the other hand, the Skoda Kodiaq offers an equally compelling set of options with its wide range of engines, including a plugin hybrid for those inclined towards eco-friendly choices. The Kodiaq can achieve an impressive combined power output extending up to 265 HP. Coupled with the advanced dual-clutch automatic transmission, the Kodiaq ensures smooth gear transitions, providing a high-performance experience with acceleration times as quick as 6.3 seconds from 0 to 100 km/h.

scroll down

CX-5 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Fuel Efficiency and Eco-friendliness

Fuel consumption is a critical aspect in today’s automotive world, and here both models exhibit conscientious fuel management. The Mazda CX-5 offers fuel consumption between 5.6 and 7.6 L/100km and sits at CO2 emissions rates ranging from 146 to 173 g/km, depending on the selected configuration. This positions the CX-5 reasonably well in terms of fuel economy and environmental impact.

In contrast, the Skoda Kodiaq shines brightly in this domain, particularly with its plugin hybrid variant consuming as low as 0.4 to 0.5 L/100km and an electric range capable of covering up to 123 km. This eco-friendly variant significantly slashes CO2 emissions to a mere 9 to 11 g/km, setting a benchmark for sustainability in the SUV category.

Kodiaq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Size, Space, and Comfort

The Mazda CX-5 measures 4575 mm in length and 1845 mm in width, promising a spacious interior for its five-passenger configuration. The vehicle also offers a generous trunk capacity of 510 to 522 liters, making it suitable for families and adventurous outings alike.

The Skoda Kodiaq, however, takes the aspect of space to a grander scale. With a length of up to 4761 mm and width of 1864 mm, this Czech SUV optimizes interior space efficiently. Most notably, it provides a significantly larger trunk volume ranging from 745 to 910 liters, giving it the edge for those who prioritize cargo space.

CX-5 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Conclusion: Choosing the Right Fit

Both the Mazda CX-5 and Skoda Kodiaq stand out in the SUV market with their distinctive strengths. The CX-5 is ideal for consumers seeking a practical yet performance-oriented drive with a selection of both traditional and hybrid engines. Meanwhile, the Kodiaq speaks to those who value interior space and cutting-edge eco-friendly technology, thanks to its impressive plugin hybrid variant.

Ultimately, the choice between the Mazda CX-5 and the Skoda Kodiaq will boil down to individual preferences: the drive experience and engine variety of the CX-5 or the spacious, eco-centric design of the Kodiaq.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Kodiaq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Mazda CX-5 has a distinct advantage in terms of price – it starts at 30000 £, while the Skoda Kodiaq costs 36800 £. That’s a price difference of around 6848 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Skoda Kodiaq manages with 0.40 L and is therefore significantly more efficient than the Mazda CX-5 with 7 L. The difference is about 6.60 L per 100 km.

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Kodiaq has a convincingly edge – offering 265 HP compared to 141 HP. That’s roughly 124 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Kodiaq is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 6.30 s, while the Mazda CX-5 takes 10.50 s. That’s about 4.20 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Skoda Kodiaq performs slightly better – reaching 231 km/h, while the Mazda CX-5 tops out at 195 km/h. The difference is around 36 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Skoda Kodiaq pulls decisively stronger with 400 Nm compared to 238 Nm. That’s about 162 Nm difference.

scroll down

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Mazda CX-5 is barely noticeable lighter – 1629 kg compared to 1684 kg. The difference is around 55 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers noticeable more room – 910 L compared to 583 L. That’s a difference of about 327 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Kodiaq performs barely noticeable better – up to 2105 L, which is about 86 L more than the Mazda CX-5.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Skoda Kodiaq shows itself to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £36,800

@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Skoda Kodiaq

Price : 36800 - 49600 £
Body Type : SUV
Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel
Transmission : Automatic
Transmission Detail : Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP : 150 - 265 HP
Consumption L/100km : 0.4 - 8.2 L
Electric Range : 113 - 123 km
Battery Capacity : 19.70 kWh
Seats : 5
Acceleration 0-100km/h : 6.3 - 9.7 s
Model Year : 2024 - 2025
Max Speed : 205 - 231 km/h
Torque : 250 - 400 Nm
Number of Cylinders : 4
Doors : 5
Model : Kodiaq
Modell : Kodiaq 1.5 TSI iV PHEV, Kodiaq 2.0 TSI, Kodiaq RS, Kodiaq 1.5 TSI mHEV, Kodiaq 2.0 TDI
CO2 Efficiency Class : B, F, G, E
Trim Level : DSG, Sportline DSG, Selection 4x4 DSG, Sportline 4x4 DSG, 4x4 DSG, Selection DSG
Power kW : 110 - 195 kW
co2 : 9 - 186 g/km
Engine capacity : 1498 - 1984 cm3
Curb weight : 1684 - 1970 kg
Fuel tank capacity : 45 - 58 L
Trunk capacity : 745 - 910 L
Length : 4758 - 4761 mm
Width : 1864 mm
Height : 1663 - 1683 mm
Brand : Skoda
Max trunk capacity : 1945 - 2105 L
Payload : 460 - 563 kg

details

Mazda CX-5

3 (1)

The Mazda CX-5 blends elegant, athletic styling with a surprisingly engaging driving character, turning routine trips into small, satisfying adventures. Inside it feels thoughtfully built and comfortable, offering sensible practicality and a premium feel that punches above its price.

details

@ Mazda Motor Corporation

@ Mazda Motor Corporation

@ Mazda Motor Corporation

Skoda Kodiaq

5 (1)

The Skoda Kodiaq blends sensible practicality with surprising style, so families and weekend adventurers get roomy comfort without looking like a moving van. It feels calm and composed on the road, packs clever storage and user-friendly tech, and manages to deliver a near-premium vibe without the pretension.

details

@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Top Car Comparisons

@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Skoda Kodiaq

@ Dacia / Renault Group Media

Dacia Bigster

The Skoda Kodiaq is the sensible grown-up: roomy, cleverly packaged and quietly refined for family life, while the Dacia Bigster bangs the value drum — massive interior and tough price tag, but fewer niceties. Choose the Kodiaq for long-term polish and smarter detailing; pick the Bigster if you …

@ Mazda Motor Corporation

Mazda CX-5

@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Skoda Karoq

The Mazda CX-5 courts you with a near-luxury cabin and engaging handling that turns everyday drives into something livelier, while the Skoda Karoq sticks to a sensible script — clever storage, roomy rear seats and sharp value for families. Choose the CX-5 if you want style, poise and a more premium …

Mazda CX-5

Skoda Kodiaq

@ Mazda Motor Corporation	@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Costs and Consumption
Price 30000 - 39500 £	Price 36800 - 49600 £
Consumption L/100km 7 - 7.4 L	Consumption L/100km 0.4 - 8.2 L
Consumption kWh/100km -	Consumption kWh/100km -
Electric Range -	Electric Range 113 - 123 km
Battery Capacity -	Battery Capacity 19.70 kWh
co2 157 - 168 g/km	co2 9 - 186 g/km
Fuel tank capacity 56 - 58 L	Fuel tank capacity 45 - 58 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type SUV	Body Type SUV
Seats 5	Seats 5
Doors 5	Doors 5
Curb weight 1629 - 1671 kg	Curb weight 1684 - 1970 kg
Trunk capacity 583 L	Trunk capacity 745 - 910 L
Length 4690 mm	Length 4758 - 4761 mm
Width 1860 mm	Width 1864 mm
Height 1695 mm	Height 1663 - 1683 mm
Max trunk capacity 2019 L	Max trunk capacity 1945 - 2105 L
Payload -	Payload 460 - 563 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type Petrol MHEV	Engine Type Plugin Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel
Transmission Automatic	Transmission Automatic
Transmission Detail Automatic Gearbox	Transmission Detail Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive	Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP 141 HP	Power HP 150 - 265 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h 10.5 - 10.9 s	Acceleration 0-100km/h 6.3 - 9.7 s
Max Speed 195 km/h	Max Speed 205 - 231 km/h
Torque 238 Nm	Torque 250 - 400 Nm
Number of Cylinders 4	Number of Cylinders 4
Power kW 104 kW	Power kW 110 - 195 kW
Engine capacity 2488 cm3	Engine capacity 1498 - 1984 cm3