Compare performance (141 HP vs 265 HP), boot space and price (30,000 £ vs 37,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-5 or Skoda Kodiaq?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
In the crowded field of SUVs, both Mazda and Skoda have made significant strides with their respective models, the CX-5 and the Kodiaq. While both vehicles offer the versatility and comfort that come with an SUV, they cater to slightly different sets of preferences and needs. Let's delve into how these two powerhouses perform against each other from a technical and innovative standpoint.
The Mazda CX-5 presents a robust lineup of engine options, featuring both petrol mild hybrid and diesel variants. This Japanese SUV offers power outputs ranging from 150 to 194 HP with a choice between manual and automatic transmissions. The CX-5 provides a reliable drive experience with options for both front-wheel and all-wheel drive. The acceleration time from 0 to 100 km/h is between 9.2 and 11.1 seconds, demonstrating effective balance and agility.
On the other hand, the Skoda Kodiaq offers an equally compelling set of options with its wide range of engines, including a plugin hybrid for those inclined towards eco-friendly choices. The Kodiaq can achieve an impressive combined power output extending up to 265 HP. Coupled with the advanced dual-clutch automatic transmission, the Kodiaq ensures smooth gear transitions, providing a high-performance experience with acceleration times as quick as 6.3 seconds from 0 to 100 km/h.
Fuel consumption is a critical aspect in today’s automotive world, and here both models exhibit conscientious fuel management. The Mazda CX-5 offers fuel consumption between 5.6 and 7.6 L/100km and sits at CO2 emissions rates ranging from 146 to 173 g/km, depending on the selected configuration. This positions the CX-5 reasonably well in terms of fuel economy and environmental impact.
In contrast, the Skoda Kodiaq shines brightly in this domain, particularly with its plugin hybrid variant consuming as low as 0.4 to 0.5 L/100km and an electric range capable of covering up to 123 km. This eco-friendly variant significantly slashes CO2 emissions to a mere 9 to 11 g/km, setting a benchmark for sustainability in the SUV category.
The Mazda CX-5 measures 4575 mm in length and 1845 mm in width, promising a spacious interior for its five-passenger configuration. The vehicle also offers a generous trunk capacity of 510 to 522 liters, making it suitable for families and adventurous outings alike.
The Skoda Kodiaq, however, takes the aspect of space to a grander scale. With a length of up to 4761 mm and width of 1864 mm, this Czech SUV optimizes interior space efficiently. Most notably, it provides a significantly larger trunk volume ranging from 745 to 910 liters, giving it the edge for those who prioritize cargo space.
Both the Mazda CX-5 and Skoda Kodiaq stand out in the SUV market with their distinctive strengths. The CX-5 is ideal for consumers seeking a practical yet performance-oriented drive with a selection of both traditional and hybrid engines. Meanwhile, the Kodiaq speaks to those who value interior space and cutting-edge eco-friendly technology, thanks to its impressive plugin hybrid variant.
Ultimately, the choice between the Mazda CX-5 and the Skoda Kodiaq will boil down to individual preferences: the drive experience and engine variety of the CX-5 or the spacious, eco-centric design of the Kodiaq.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Mazda CX-5 is visibly cheaper – starting at 30,000 £ , while the Skoda Kodiaq costs 37,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 7,886 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Skoda Kodiaq uses 1.5 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Mazda CX-5 with 7 L/100km. The difference is about 5.5 L/100km.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Kodiaq offers considerably more power – delivering 265 HP compared to 141 HP. That’s roughly 124 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Kodiaq is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 6.3 s, while the Mazda CX-5 takes 10.5 s. That’s about 4.2 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Kodiaq delivers considerably more torque with 400 Nm compared to 238 Nm. That’s about 162 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-5 is marginally lighter – 1,629 kg compared to 1,684 kg. The difference is around 55 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers significantly more boot space – 910 L compared to 466 L. That’s a difference of about 444 L.
When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-5 carries marginally more – 601 kg compared to 563 kg. That’s a difference of about 38 kg.
The Skoda Kodiaq is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Mazda CX-5 blends elegant, athletic styling with a surprisingly engaging driving character, turning routine trips into small, satisfying adventures. Inside it feels thoughtfully built and comfortable, offering sensible practicality and a premium feel that punches above its price.
details
The Skoda Kodiaq blends sensible practicality with surprising style, so families and weekend adventurers get roomy comfort without looking like a moving van. It feels calm and composed on the road, packs clever storage and user-friendly tech, and manages to deliver a near-premium vibe without the pretension.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
30,000 - 39,500 £
|
Price
37,900 - 50,600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
7 - 7.5 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
1.5 - 8.2 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
119 - 122 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
157 - 169 g/km
|
co2
35 - 186 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
58 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,629 - 1,671 kg
|
Curb weight
1,684 - 1,970 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
466 L
|
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4,758 mm
|
|
Width
1,860 mm
|
Width
1,864 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,679 - 1,683 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
2,105 L
|
|
Payload
566 - 601 kg
|
Payload
460 - 563 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
141 HP
|
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.5 - 10.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
226 km/h
|
|
Torque
238 Nm
|
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
104 kW
|
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
2,488 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, G, E, B
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España